Value of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in predicting reproductive outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-15 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2026.2618228
Srisailesh Vitthala, Silvia Nedelcu, Tarek El-Toukhy, Abha Maheshwari
{"title":"Value of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in predicting reproductive outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Srisailesh Vitthala, Silvia Nedelcu, Tarek El-Toukhy, Abha Maheshwari","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2026.2618228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Male infertility is commonly diagnosed by semen analysis, but it often fails to distinguish fertile from infertile men unless abnormalities are marked. Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing is becoming a diagnostic aid. High SDF-defined as values higher than assay-specific cut-offs-predicts adverse reproductive outcomes in natural conception and after IUI, IVF, and ICSI, as shown in this systematic review and meta-analysis. From inception to March 2025, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and SCISEARCH for COMET, SCSA, TUNEL, or SCD studies that reported pregnancy or miscarriage. Assay cut-offs were used to extract data into 2x2 tables. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios were evaluated using random-effects HSROC models following PRISMA and QUADAS-2 guidelines. In 52 trials with 19,930 subjects, all reported pregnancies and 41 reported miscarriages. High SDF had low sensitivity and higher specificity across natural and assisted conception, with modest likelihood and diagnostic odds ratios indicating limited discrimination. With significant heterogeneity, HSROC curves showed poor-to-moderate discrimination. High SDF had low sensitivity and high specificity for miscarriage, indicating poor prediction. Evaluating high SDF alone to predict pregnancy or miscarriage is limited. Its clinical value needs to be determined through well-designed trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"29 1","pages":"2618228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2026.2618228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Male infertility is commonly diagnosed by semen analysis, but it often fails to distinguish fertile from infertile men unless abnormalities are marked. Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing is becoming a diagnostic aid. High SDF-defined as values higher than assay-specific cut-offs-predicts adverse reproductive outcomes in natural conception and after IUI, IVF, and ICSI, as shown in this systematic review and meta-analysis. From inception to March 2025, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and SCISEARCH for COMET, SCSA, TUNEL, or SCD studies that reported pregnancy or miscarriage. Assay cut-offs were used to extract data into 2x2 tables. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios were evaluated using random-effects HSROC models following PRISMA and QUADAS-2 guidelines. In 52 trials with 19,930 subjects, all reported pregnancies and 41 reported miscarriages. High SDF had low sensitivity and higher specificity across natural and assisted conception, with modest likelihood and diagnostic odds ratios indicating limited discrimination. With significant heterogeneity, HSROC curves showed poor-to-moderate discrimination. High SDF had low sensitivity and high specificity for miscarriage, indicating poor prediction. Evaluating high SDF alone to predict pregnancy or miscarriage is limited. Its clinical value needs to be determined through well-designed trials.

精子DNA片段(SDF)在预测生殖结果中的价值——一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
男性不育症通常通过精液分析来诊断,但除非异常明显,否则通常无法区分有生育能力的男性和不育男性。精子DNA片段(SDF)检测正在成为一种诊断辅助手段。本系统综述和荟萃分析显示,高sdf(定义为高于测定特异性截断值)可预测自然受孕和IUI、IVF和ICSI后的不良生殖结果。从成立到2025年3月,我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science和SCISEARCH,检索了报告怀孕或流产的COMET、SCSA、TUNEL或SCD研究。采用检测截止值将数据提取到2x2表格中。采用随机效应HSROC模型,遵循PRISMA和QUADAS-2指南,评估合并敏感性、特异性、似然比和诊断优势比。在涉及19,930名受试者的52项试验中,所有人都报告怀孕,41人报告流产。高SDF在自然受孕和辅助受孕中具有低敏感性和高特异性,具有适度的可能性和诊断优势比,表明歧视有限。在异质性显著的情况下,HSROC曲线表现为差到中度的区分。高SDF对流产的敏感性低,特异性高,预测效果较差。单独评估高SDF来预测妊娠或流产是有限的。其临床价值需要通过精心设计的试验来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书