Limitations of inflammatory biomarkers in differentiating patients with fungal pneumonia and bacterial co-infection.

Q3 Medicine
Current Medical Mycology Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22034/cmm.2025.345248.1602
Sergey A Pogodin, Daniel F M Gonzalez, Rajkumar Rajendran, Juan U Rojo
{"title":"Limitations of inflammatory biomarkers in differentiating patients with fungal pneumonia and bacterial co-infection.","authors":"Sergey A Pogodin, Daniel F M Gonzalez, Rajkumar Rajendran, Juan U Rojo","doi":"10.22034/cmm.2025.345248.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>With the increasing number of fungal infections due to antibiotic use and growing numbers of immunocompromised patients, it has become imperative to understand the nature of these infections. Fungal infections, however, remain largely understudied and underdiagnosed, especially when it comes to co-infections with other organisms. This study aimed to compare inflammatory biomarkers in fungal pneumonia patients with and without bacterial co-infections and analyze the frequencies of the causative bacterial and fungal organisms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study used electronic medical records from patients diagnosed with fungal pneumonia from January 2013 to December 2023. Fungal and bacterial etiologies were identified with International Classification of Diseases-10 codes and summarized with descriptive statistics. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and length of stay were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-squared test. Inflammatory biomarkers, including C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, procalcitonin, white blood cell count, body temperature, ferritin, and electrolytes, were collected using Current Procedural Terminology codes and compared using Chi-squared test between patients diagnosed with fungal pneumonia alone or with fungal pneumonia and bacterial co-infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 1,024 patients were diagnosed with fungal pneumonia. The most common diagnosis among the patients was unspecified mycosis. Moreover, the most common organism-specific mycotic disease was pneumocystosis. Comorbidities, including diabetes and chronic inflammatory disease, were more common in patients with co-infection (<i>p</i> < 0.05). None of the inflammatory biomarkers investigated were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lack of specificity of most fungal organisms responsible for pneumonia highlights the critical lack of specific diagnostic methods for fungal diseases. The results show that inflammatory biomarkers are not significantly different between fungal pneumonia patients with and without bacterial co-infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10863,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Mycology","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12905551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22034/cmm.2025.345248.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: With the increasing number of fungal infections due to antibiotic use and growing numbers of immunocompromised patients, it has become imperative to understand the nature of these infections. Fungal infections, however, remain largely understudied and underdiagnosed, especially when it comes to co-infections with other organisms. This study aimed to compare inflammatory biomarkers in fungal pneumonia patients with and without bacterial co-infections and analyze the frequencies of the causative bacterial and fungal organisms.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study used electronic medical records from patients diagnosed with fungal pneumonia from January 2013 to December 2023. Fungal and bacterial etiologies were identified with International Classification of Diseases-10 codes and summarized with descriptive statistics. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and length of stay were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-squared test. Inflammatory biomarkers, including C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, procalcitonin, white blood cell count, body temperature, ferritin, and electrolytes, were collected using Current Procedural Terminology codes and compared using Chi-squared test between patients diagnosed with fungal pneumonia alone or with fungal pneumonia and bacterial co-infection.

Results:  A total of 1,024 patients were diagnosed with fungal pneumonia. The most common diagnosis among the patients was unspecified mycosis. Moreover, the most common organism-specific mycotic disease was pneumocystosis. Comorbidities, including diabetes and chronic inflammatory disease, were more common in patients with co-infection (p < 0.05). None of the inflammatory biomarkers investigated were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Lack of specificity of most fungal organisms responsible for pneumonia highlights the critical lack of specific diagnostic methods for fungal diseases. The results show that inflammatory biomarkers are not significantly different between fungal pneumonia patients with and without bacterial co-infections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

炎症生物标志物在鉴别真菌性肺炎和细菌性合并感染患者中的局限性。
背景与目的:随着抗生素使用引起的真菌感染数量的增加和免疫功能低下患者数量的增加,了解这些感染的性质已成为当务之急。然而,真菌感染在很大程度上仍然没有得到充分的研究和诊断,特别是当它与其他生物体共感染时。本研究旨在比较合并和不合并细菌感染的真菌性肺炎患者的炎症生物标志物,并分析致病细菌和真菌有机体的频率。材料和方法:本回顾性研究使用2013年1月至2023年12月诊断为真菌性肺炎患者的电子病历。真菌和细菌的病因用国际疾病分类-10代码进行鉴定,并用描述性统计进行总结。使用描述性统计和卡方检验分析基线特征、合并症和住院时间。使用现行程序术语代码收集炎症生物标志物,包括c反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率、降钙素原、白细胞计数、体温、铁蛋白和电解质,并在单独诊断为真菌性肺炎或真菌性肺炎合并细菌感染的患者中使用卡方检验进行比较。结果:确诊真菌性肺炎1024例。患者中最常见的诊断是不明真菌病。此外,最常见的有机体特异性真菌病是肺囊虫病。合并感染患者的合并症(包括糖尿病和慢性炎症性疾病)更为常见(p < 0.05)。所调查的炎症生物标志物均无统计学意义。结论:大多数导致肺炎的真菌生物缺乏特异性,这凸显了真菌疾病特异性诊断方法的严重缺乏。结果显示,真菌肺炎合并和不合并细菌感染患者的炎症生物标志物无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Mycology
Current Medical Mycology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书