{"title":"Optimisation of Temporary and Demountable Flood Protection for Infrastructure Resilience","authors":"Fulvio D. Lopane, Richard J. Dawson","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infrastructure systems provide crucial services to human settlements. Extreme weather events, especially flooding, can disrupt these vital services. Temporary and demountable flood protections (TDFPs) are increasingly used to protect infrastructure assets and provide resilience. Budget constraints mean that TDFP are typically deployed to multiple sites from a single warehouse. Identifying optimal locations to maximise coverage and minimise costs is a complex spatial problem not yet tackled in the literature. To address this, a Spatial Resource Allocation Optimisation (SRAO) framework, using a genetic algorithm (GA), has been developed. The SRAO framework is applied to a case study in the Humber Estuary (UK) where 133 strategic infrastructure assets serve over 400,000 people in the floodplain. Eight scenarios assess how cost, TDFP availability, transport and asset prioritisation for protection influence warehouse size and sites. The SRAO identifies optimal strategies that, relative to other strategies, reduce annual costs by 40%–50% and deployment times by 60%–70%. Furthermore, 8 ‘hotspot’ sites appear in over 60% of optimal solutions; these can be considered robust to model uncertainties and scenario assumptions, providing decision-makers with locations performing well under varied conditions. The methodology benefits local authorities, infrastructure operators and emergency management agencies, reducing costs and improving resilience for communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70182","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Infrastructure systems provide crucial services to human settlements. Extreme weather events, especially flooding, can disrupt these vital services. Temporary and demountable flood protections (TDFPs) are increasingly used to protect infrastructure assets and provide resilience. Budget constraints mean that TDFP are typically deployed to multiple sites from a single warehouse. Identifying optimal locations to maximise coverage and minimise costs is a complex spatial problem not yet tackled in the literature. To address this, a Spatial Resource Allocation Optimisation (SRAO) framework, using a genetic algorithm (GA), has been developed. The SRAO framework is applied to a case study in the Humber Estuary (UK) where 133 strategic infrastructure assets serve over 400,000 people in the floodplain. Eight scenarios assess how cost, TDFP availability, transport and asset prioritisation for protection influence warehouse size and sites. The SRAO identifies optimal strategies that, relative to other strategies, reduce annual costs by 40%–50% and deployment times by 60%–70%. Furthermore, 8 ‘hotspot’ sites appear in over 60% of optimal solutions; these can be considered robust to model uncertainties and scenario assumptions, providing decision-makers with locations performing well under varied conditions. The methodology benefits local authorities, infrastructure operators and emergency management agencies, reducing costs and improving resilience for communities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.