Relative contribution of uncertainties to standardized drought index calculation using a linear mixture model

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Journal of Hydro-environment Research Pub Date : 2026-06-30 Epub Date: 2026-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jher.2026.100697
Ji Yae Shin , Jeongwoo Han , Hyun-Han Kwon , Tae-Woong Kim
{"title":"Relative contribution of uncertainties to standardized drought index calculation using a linear mixture model","authors":"Ji Yae Shin ,&nbsp;Jeongwoo Han ,&nbsp;Hyun-Han Kwon ,&nbsp;Tae-Woong Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jher.2026.100697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is widely used for monitoring drought due to its simplicity and effectiveness. However, various uncertainties arise from multiple factors in SPI calculation including the length of precipitation data, accumulation periods, probability distributions, and parameter estimation methods. This study aims to quantify the relative contribution of these factors to SPI uncertainty using a linear mixed model (LMM). In this study, various SPI calculation scenarios were considered by combining three data lengths (20, 30, and 50 years), four accumulation periods (1, 3, 6, and 12 months), five probability distributions (gamma, normal, log-normal, logistic, and generalized extreme value), and two parameter estimation methods (maximum likelihood estimation and L-moment). In our study, reference precipitation was defined as the amount of precipitation corresponding to a target SPI value (e.g., –1.0 or –2.0), determined by inverting the standard SPI calculation process. The uncertainty was quantified by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) between the reference SPI and calculated SPI from various SPI calculation scenarios. The results showed that uncertainty decreased with longer accumulation periods and data lengths, while the RMSE was substantially higher and more variable under SPI = –2.0 than SPI = –1.0. The LMM was then used to assess the contribution of each uncertainty factor. The results revealed that for moderate drought conditions (SPI = –1.0), the primary contributors to uncertainty were sample size and accumulation period. However, under extreme drought conditions (SPI = –2.0), probability distribution accounted for over 50% of the total variance, reaching up to 84% in some cases. The impact of parameter estimation methods was relatively nonsignificant under all conditions, consistently accounting for less than 3% of the total variance. These findings suggest that selecting an appropriate distribution and using long-term precipitation data are critical for improving the reliability of SPI-based drought assessments. This study highlights the critical need for long-term precipitation records (at least 50 years), appropriate accumulation periods, and rigorous selection of probability distributions, particularly under extreme drought conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49303,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydro-environment Research","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 100697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydro-environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570644326000043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is widely used for monitoring drought due to its simplicity and effectiveness. However, various uncertainties arise from multiple factors in SPI calculation including the length of precipitation data, accumulation periods, probability distributions, and parameter estimation methods. This study aims to quantify the relative contribution of these factors to SPI uncertainty using a linear mixed model (LMM). In this study, various SPI calculation scenarios were considered by combining three data lengths (20, 30, and 50 years), four accumulation periods (1, 3, 6, and 12 months), five probability distributions (gamma, normal, log-normal, logistic, and generalized extreme value), and two parameter estimation methods (maximum likelihood estimation and L-moment). In our study, reference precipitation was defined as the amount of precipitation corresponding to a target SPI value (e.g., –1.0 or –2.0), determined by inverting the standard SPI calculation process. The uncertainty was quantified by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) between the reference SPI and calculated SPI from various SPI calculation scenarios. The results showed that uncertainty decreased with longer accumulation periods and data lengths, while the RMSE was substantially higher and more variable under SPI = –2.0 than SPI = –1.0. The LMM was then used to assess the contribution of each uncertainty factor. The results revealed that for moderate drought conditions (SPI = –1.0), the primary contributors to uncertainty were sample size and accumulation period. However, under extreme drought conditions (SPI = –2.0), probability distribution accounted for over 50% of the total variance, reaching up to 84% in some cases. The impact of parameter estimation methods was relatively nonsignificant under all conditions, consistently accounting for less than 3% of the total variance. These findings suggest that selecting an appropriate distribution and using long-term precipitation data are critical for improving the reliability of SPI-based drought assessments. This study highlights the critical need for long-term precipitation records (at least 50 years), appropriate accumulation periods, and rigorous selection of probability distributions, particularly under extreme drought conditions.
不确定性对线性混合模型标准化干旱指数计算的相对贡献
标准化降水指数(SPI)因其简单、有效而被广泛应用于干旱监测。但是,在SPI计算中,降水数据的长度、积累周期、概率分布、参数估计方法等因素会产生各种不确定性。本研究旨在利用线性混合模型(LMM)量化这些因素对SPI不确定性的相对贡献。本研究结合3种数据长度(20年、30年和50年)、4个积累周期(1、3、6和12个月)、5种概率分布(gamma、正态、对数正态、logistic和广义极值)以及2种参数估计方法(极大似然估计和l矩),考虑了多种SPI计算场景。在我们的研究中,参考降水量被定义为与目标SPI值(例如-1.0或-2.0)相对应的降水量,通过反演标准SPI计算过程来确定。通过计算参考SPI与各种SPI计算场景下计算SPI之间的均方根误差(RMSE)来量化不确定度。结果表明,随着积累周期和数据长度的延长,不确定性降低,而SPI = -2.0时的RMSE比SPI = -1.0时的RMSE高得多,变量也更多。然后使用LMM来评估每个不确定因素的贡献。结果表明,在中度干旱条件下(SPI = -1.0),不确定性的主要影响因子是样本量和积累期。而在极端干旱条件下(SPI = -2.0),概率分布占总方差的50%以上,有的甚至高达84%。在所有条件下,参数估计方法的影响相对不显著,始终占总方差的3%以下。这些发现表明,选择适当的分布和使用长期降水数据对于提高基于spi的干旱评估的可靠性至关重要。这项研究强调了对长期降水记录(至少50年)、适当的积累期和严格选择概率分布的迫切需要,特别是在极端干旱条件下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydro-environment Research
Journal of Hydro-environment Research ENGINEERING, CIVIL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The journal aims to provide an international platform for the dissemination of research and engineering applications related to water and hydraulic problems in the Asia-Pacific region. The journal provides a wide distribution at affordable subscription rate, as well as a rapid reviewing and publication time. The journal particularly encourages papers from young researchers. Papers that require extensive language editing, qualify for editorial assistance with American Journal Experts, a Language Editing Company that Elsevier recommends. Authors submitting to this journal are entitled to a 10% discount.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书