Navigating the Transition to APPEs: A Survey of US Schools of Pharmacy

IF 3.1 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Laressa Bethishou , Albert Bach, Kathleen Besinque, Jeff Goad, Karl Hess, Emmanuelle Schwartzman
{"title":"Navigating the Transition to APPEs: A Survey of US Schools of Pharmacy","authors":"Laressa Bethishou ,&nbsp;Albert Bach,&nbsp;Kathleen Besinque,&nbsp;Jeff Goad,&nbsp;Karl Hess,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Schwartzman","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2026.101945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the current state of curriculum elements designed to transition student pharmacists in the United States to Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs) and to identify trends, strategies, and challenges in their implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was administered to 142 accredited US schools of pharmacy between May and October 2024. One faculty member with curriculum oversight was selected per institution. The survey collected data on course structure, content delivery, evaluation strategies, and perceived barriers. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative data, and thematic analysis was applied to open-ended responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 115 responses were received (80.9% response rate). Of these, 75.7% (<em>n</em> = 84) reported an intentionally designed transition to APPE curriculum, most commonly as a stand-alone course delivered immediately prior to APPEs. Programs covered key topics such as professionalism (91%), literature evaluation (88.9%), and therapeutics (86.5%), using diverse teaching and assessment strategies, including simulations, examinations, and objective structured clinical examinations. Fewer programs addressed wellness (44.2%) or professional identity formation (55.8%). Faculty cited challenges such as lack of standardized APPE readiness definitions, varied assessment methods, and resource limitations. Programs without formal transition curricula often integrated APPE readiness into broader curricular components.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is considerable variability in how pharmacy schools approach student transitions to APPEs. The findings highlight that most schools have discrete curricula for APPE transitions, but there is a need for shared definitions, standardization, and guidance in curriculum design and assessment. These results may inform the future development of best practices to ensure consistent and effective preparation of students for experiential learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"90 3","pages":"Article 101945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945926000197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe the current state of curriculum elements designed to transition student pharmacists in the United States to Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs) and to identify trends, strategies, and challenges in their implementation.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was administered to 142 accredited US schools of pharmacy between May and October 2024. One faculty member with curriculum oversight was selected per institution. The survey collected data on course structure, content delivery, evaluation strategies, and perceived barriers. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative data, and thematic analysis was applied to open-ended responses.

Results

A total of 115 responses were received (80.9% response rate). Of these, 75.7% (n = 84) reported an intentionally designed transition to APPE curriculum, most commonly as a stand-alone course delivered immediately prior to APPEs. Programs covered key topics such as professionalism (91%), literature evaluation (88.9%), and therapeutics (86.5%), using diverse teaching and assessment strategies, including simulations, examinations, and objective structured clinical examinations. Fewer programs addressed wellness (44.2%) or professional identity formation (55.8%). Faculty cited challenges such as lack of standardized APPE readiness definitions, varied assessment methods, and resource limitations. Programs without formal transition curricula often integrated APPE readiness into broader curricular components.

Conclusion

There is considerable variability in how pharmacy schools approach student transitions to APPEs. The findings highlight that most schools have discrete curricula for APPE transitions, but there is a need for shared definitions, standardization, and guidance in curriculum design and assessment. These results may inform the future development of best practices to ensure consistent and effective preparation of students for experiential learning.
导航过渡到应用程序:美国药学院的调查。
目的:描述旨在使美国药学学生过渡到高级药学实践经验(APPEs)的课程要素的现状,并确定其实施中的趋势、策略和挑战。方法:于2024年5月至10月对142所经认证的美国药学院进行横断面调查。每个机构选出一名负责课程监督的教员。该调查收集了有关课程结构、内容交付、评估策略和感知障碍的数据。描述性统计总结了定量数据,主题分析应用于开放式答复。结果:共收到应答115份,应答率80.9%。其中,75.7% (n=84)报告了有意设计的向APPE课程的过渡,最常见的是在APPE之前立即提供的独立课程。课程涵盖了专业精神(91%)、文献评价(88.9%)和治疗学(86.5%)等关键主题,采用多种教学和评估策略,包括模拟、考试和osce。涉及健康(44.2%)或职业认同形成(55.8%)的项目较少。教师们列举了诸如缺乏标准化的APPE准备定义、不同的评估方法和资源限制等挑战。没有正式过渡课程的项目通常将APPE准备纳入更广泛的课程组成部分。结论:药学院如何处理学生向APPEs的转变存在相当大的差异。研究结果强调,大多数学校都有独立的APPE过渡课程,但在课程设计和评估方面需要共享定义、标准化和指导。这些结果可以为未来最佳实践的发展提供信息,以确保学生为体验式学习做一致和有效的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书