Laressa Bethishou , Albert Bach, Kathleen Besinque, Jeff Goad, Karl Hess, Emmanuelle Schwartzman
{"title":"Navigating the Transition to APPEs: A Survey of US Schools of Pharmacy","authors":"Laressa Bethishou , Albert Bach, Kathleen Besinque, Jeff Goad, Karl Hess, Emmanuelle Schwartzman","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2026.101945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the current state of curriculum elements designed to transition student pharmacists in the United States to Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs) and to identify trends, strategies, and challenges in their implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was administered to 142 accredited US schools of pharmacy between May and October 2024. One faculty member with curriculum oversight was selected per institution. The survey collected data on course structure, content delivery, evaluation strategies, and perceived barriers. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative data, and thematic analysis was applied to open-ended responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 115 responses were received (80.9% response rate). Of these, 75.7% (<em>n</em> = 84) reported an intentionally designed transition to APPE curriculum, most commonly as a stand-alone course delivered immediately prior to APPEs. Programs covered key topics such as professionalism (91%), literature evaluation (88.9%), and therapeutics (86.5%), using diverse teaching and assessment strategies, including simulations, examinations, and objective structured clinical examinations. Fewer programs addressed wellness (44.2%) or professional identity formation (55.8%). Faculty cited challenges such as lack of standardized APPE readiness definitions, varied assessment methods, and resource limitations. Programs without formal transition curricula often integrated APPE readiness into broader curricular components.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is considerable variability in how pharmacy schools approach student transitions to APPEs. The findings highlight that most schools have discrete curricula for APPE transitions, but there is a need for shared definitions, standardization, and guidance in curriculum design and assessment. These results may inform the future development of best practices to ensure consistent and effective preparation of students for experiential learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"90 3","pages":"Article 101945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945926000197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To describe the current state of curriculum elements designed to transition student pharmacists in the United States to Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs) and to identify trends, strategies, and challenges in their implementation.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was administered to 142 accredited US schools of pharmacy between May and October 2024. One faculty member with curriculum oversight was selected per institution. The survey collected data on course structure, content delivery, evaluation strategies, and perceived barriers. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative data, and thematic analysis was applied to open-ended responses.
Results
A total of 115 responses were received (80.9% response rate). Of these, 75.7% (n = 84) reported an intentionally designed transition to APPE curriculum, most commonly as a stand-alone course delivered immediately prior to APPEs. Programs covered key topics such as professionalism (91%), literature evaluation (88.9%), and therapeutics (86.5%), using diverse teaching and assessment strategies, including simulations, examinations, and objective structured clinical examinations. Fewer programs addressed wellness (44.2%) or professional identity formation (55.8%). Faculty cited challenges such as lack of standardized APPE readiness definitions, varied assessment methods, and resource limitations. Programs without formal transition curricula often integrated APPE readiness into broader curricular components.
Conclusion
There is considerable variability in how pharmacy schools approach student transitions to APPEs. The findings highlight that most schools have discrete curricula for APPE transitions, but there is a need for shared definitions, standardization, and guidance in curriculum design and assessment. These results may inform the future development of best practices to ensure consistent and effective preparation of students for experiential learning.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.