Dosimetric comparison of organs at risk in ultra-hypofractionated versus hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: single center clinical study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2026-02-06 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.2478/raon-2026-0008
Gordana Petkovska, Ivica Ratosa, Valentina Bojovska Trajanovska, Marina Iljovska, Albina Pupakovski Creslovnik, Emilija Lazareva
{"title":"Dosimetric comparison of organs at risk in ultra-hypofractionated versus hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: single center clinical study.","authors":"Gordana Petkovska, Ivica Ratosa, Valentina Bojovska Trajanovska, Marina Iljovska, Albina Pupakovski Creslovnik, Emilija Lazareva","doi":"10.2478/raon-2026-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing evidence of safety and feasibility has prompted a shift toward ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) schedules in postoperative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty patients over 50 years of age with early breast cancer (T1-2 and N0-1) who underwent postoperative, 3D conformal, free-breathing whole breast radiotherapy were included. The prospective arm consisted of 40 patients treated with UHF (26 Gy/5 fractions/one week) from 2023-2024, whereas the control arm was retrospective and represented by data from 40 patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) (40.5-42.2Gy/15-16 fractions/3 weeks) between 2015 and 2020. Dosimetric parameters for organs at risk (OARs) (heart and ipsilateral lung) were derived from the dose-volume histograms. Statistical evaluation was done with paired sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dosimetric analysis revealed that patients treated with UHF schedule received significantly lower equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD<sub>2</sub>Gy) to OARs compared with those treated with the HF schedule. The mean ipsilateral lung EQD<sub>2</sub>Gy dose was significantly lower in the UHF group (3.94 ± 2.1 Gy) than in the HF group (6.24 ± 2.4 Gy; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Among patients with left-sided breast cancer, the mean heart EQD<sub>2</sub>Gy dose was also significantly reduced in the UHF group (1.34 ± 0.5 Gy) compared with the HF group (3.02 ± 1.4 Gy; <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate a consistent dosimetric advantage of the UHF schedule, particularly in reducing radiation exposure to the heart and ipsilateral lung. These results support the dosimetric safety and feasibility of UHF schedules in early breast cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13012382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2026-0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence of safety and feasibility has prompted a shift toward ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) schedules in postoperative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.

Patients and methods: Eighty patients over 50 years of age with early breast cancer (T1-2 and N0-1) who underwent postoperative, 3D conformal, free-breathing whole breast radiotherapy were included. The prospective arm consisted of 40 patients treated with UHF (26 Gy/5 fractions/one week) from 2023-2024, whereas the control arm was retrospective and represented by data from 40 patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) (40.5-42.2Gy/15-16 fractions/3 weeks) between 2015 and 2020. Dosimetric parameters for organs at risk (OARs) (heart and ipsilateral lung) were derived from the dose-volume histograms. Statistical evaluation was done with paired sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Dosimetric analysis revealed that patients treated with UHF schedule received significantly lower equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2Gy) to OARs compared with those treated with the HF schedule. The mean ipsilateral lung EQD2Gy dose was significantly lower in the UHF group (3.94 ± 2.1 Gy) than in the HF group (6.24 ± 2.4 Gy; p < 0.01). Among patients with left-sided breast cancer, the mean heart EQD2Gy dose was also significantly reduced in the UHF group (1.34 ± 0.5 Gy) compared with the HF group (3.02 ± 1.4 Gy; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: These findings indicate a consistent dosimetric advantage of the UHF schedule, particularly in reducing radiation exposure to the heart and ipsilateral lung. These results support the dosimetric safety and feasibility of UHF schedules in early breast cancer treatment.

Abstract Image

早期乳腺癌术后超低分割放疗与低分割放疗中危险器官的剂量学比较:单中心临床研究
背景:越来越多的安全性和可行性证据促使早期乳腺癌术后放疗转向超低分割(UHF)方案。患者和方法:80例50岁以上早期乳腺癌患者(T1-2和N0-1),术后行三维适形、自由呼吸全乳放疗。前瞻性组包括2023-2024年间接受UHF (26 Gy/5分/一周)治疗的40例患者,而对照组是回顾性的,包括2015 - 2020年间接受低分割放疗(40.5-42.2Gy/15-16分/3周)治疗的40例患者的数据。危险器官(心脏和同侧肺)的剂量学参数来自剂量-体积直方图。统计学评价采用配对样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。结果:剂量学分析显示,与HF方案治疗的患者相比,UHF方案治疗的患者接受的2Gy当量剂量(EQD2Gy)明显低于HF方案治疗的患者。UHF组同侧肺EQD2Gy平均剂量(3.94±2.1 Gy)明显低于HF组(6.24±2.4 Gy, p < 0.01)。在左侧乳腺癌患者中,UHF组心脏EQD2Gy的平均剂量(1.34±0.5 Gy)也明显低于HF组(3.02±1.4 Gy; p < 0.01)。结论:这些发现表明,超高频计划具有一致的剂量学优势,特别是在减少对心脏和同侧肺的辐射暴露方面。这些结果支持UHF方案在早期乳腺癌治疗中的剂量学安全性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书