Machine learning in forensic toxicology: Concepts, applications and challenges in bioanalysis, ADME, and toxicodynamics

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Forensic science international Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2026.112883
Katharina Elisabeth Grafinger , Wolfgang Weinmann , Daniel Pasin , Henrik Gréen , Christophe P. Stove , Verena Schöning , Felix Hammann
{"title":"Machine learning in forensic toxicology: Concepts, applications and challenges in bioanalysis, ADME, and toxicodynamics","authors":"Katharina Elisabeth Grafinger ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Weinmann ,&nbsp;Daniel Pasin ,&nbsp;Henrik Gréen ,&nbsp;Christophe P. Stove ,&nbsp;Verena Schöning ,&nbsp;Felix Hammann","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2026.112883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forensic toxicology focuses on the detection, quantification, and interpretation of medicinal and recreational drugs, other chemicals or poisons, and their metabolites in biological matrices. Chromatography, combined with mass spectrometry (MS), is the most widely used analytical technique. However, forensic toxicology faces increasing analytical challenges due to a continuously changing drug landscape. In particular, the emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has driven the development of more complex analytical methods (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry), novel markers (e.g., metabolomics), or innovative screening approaches (e.g., activity-based), which collectively generate vast amounts of data. These challenges include rapid market dynamics with the constant emergence of new chemical scaffolds and modifications, complex fragmentation and metabolic behavior, and limited or delayed access to reference materials- These developments are not limited to NPS alone. Consequently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have increasingly found their way into forensic toxicology. This review discusses various applications of ML methods related to bioanalysis, metabolomics, and toxicodynamics in the context of forensic toxicology. Currently, a major limitation is the compilation of sufficiently large and suitable datasets, which is often constrained by limited availability of real case data, inhomogeneous analytical data, <em>in vivo</em> study designs with small group size (&lt; 10 animals per group), or a low number of included substances. Ultimately, the quality of an ML model relies not only on data quality but also on a thorough understanding of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology, medical case history, and ML design, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in these studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 112883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073826000708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forensic toxicology focuses on the detection, quantification, and interpretation of medicinal and recreational drugs, other chemicals or poisons, and their metabolites in biological matrices. Chromatography, combined with mass spectrometry (MS), is the most widely used analytical technique. However, forensic toxicology faces increasing analytical challenges due to a continuously changing drug landscape. In particular, the emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has driven the development of more complex analytical methods (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry), novel markers (e.g., metabolomics), or innovative screening approaches (e.g., activity-based), which collectively generate vast amounts of data. These challenges include rapid market dynamics with the constant emergence of new chemical scaffolds and modifications, complex fragmentation and metabolic behavior, and limited or delayed access to reference materials- These developments are not limited to NPS alone. Consequently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have increasingly found their way into forensic toxicology. This review discusses various applications of ML methods related to bioanalysis, metabolomics, and toxicodynamics in the context of forensic toxicology. Currently, a major limitation is the compilation of sufficiently large and suitable datasets, which is often constrained by limited availability of real case data, inhomogeneous analytical data, in vivo study designs with small group size (< 10 animals per group), or a low number of included substances. Ultimately, the quality of an ML model relies not only on data quality but also on a thorough understanding of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology, medical case history, and ML design, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in these studies.
法医毒理学中的机器学习:生物分析、ADME和毒理学中的概念、应用和挑战
法医毒理学侧重于检测、定量和解释药用和娱乐性药物、其他化学物质或毒物及其在生物基质中的代谢物。色谱与质谱(MS)相结合是应用最广泛的分析技术。然而,由于不断变化的毒品环境,法医毒理学面临着越来越多的分析挑战。特别是,新的精神活性物质(NPS)的出现推动了更复杂的分析方法(例如,高分辨率质谱)、新的标记(例如,代谢组学)或创新的筛选方法(例如,基于活性的)的发展,这些方法共同产生了大量的数据。这些挑战包括快速的市场动态,不断出现新的化学支架和修饰,复杂的碎片化和代谢行为,以及有限或延迟获得参考材料。这些发展不仅限于NPS。因此,机器学习(ML)算法越来越多地应用于法医毒理学。本文综述了与生物分析、代谢组学和毒理学相关的ML方法在法医毒理学领域的各种应用。目前,一个主要的限制是编制足够大和合适的数据集,这往往受到实际病例数据可用性有限、分析数据不均匀、小组规模小(每组10只动物)或纳入物质数量少的体内研究设计的限制。最终,机器学习模型的质量不仅依赖于数据质量,还依赖于对分析化学、生物化学、药理学、病历和机器学习设计的透彻理解,这突出了跨学科合作在这些研究中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书