Katharina Elisabeth Grafinger , Wolfgang Weinmann , Daniel Pasin , Henrik Gréen , Christophe P. Stove , Verena Schöning , Felix Hammann
{"title":"Machine learning in forensic toxicology: Concepts, applications and challenges in bioanalysis, ADME, and toxicodynamics","authors":"Katharina Elisabeth Grafinger , Wolfgang Weinmann , Daniel Pasin , Henrik Gréen , Christophe P. Stove , Verena Schöning , Felix Hammann","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2026.112883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forensic toxicology focuses on the detection, quantification, and interpretation of medicinal and recreational drugs, other chemicals or poisons, and their metabolites in biological matrices. Chromatography, combined with mass spectrometry (MS), is the most widely used analytical technique. However, forensic toxicology faces increasing analytical challenges due to a continuously changing drug landscape. In particular, the emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has driven the development of more complex analytical methods (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry), novel markers (e.g., metabolomics), or innovative screening approaches (e.g., activity-based), which collectively generate vast amounts of data. These challenges include rapid market dynamics with the constant emergence of new chemical scaffolds and modifications, complex fragmentation and metabolic behavior, and limited or delayed access to reference materials- These developments are not limited to NPS alone. Consequently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have increasingly found their way into forensic toxicology. This review discusses various applications of ML methods related to bioanalysis, metabolomics, and toxicodynamics in the context of forensic toxicology. Currently, a major limitation is the compilation of sufficiently large and suitable datasets, which is often constrained by limited availability of real case data, inhomogeneous analytical data, <em>in vivo</em> study designs with small group size (< 10 animals per group), or a low number of included substances. Ultimately, the quality of an ML model relies not only on data quality but also on a thorough understanding of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology, medical case history, and ML design, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in these studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 112883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073826000708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forensic toxicology focuses on the detection, quantification, and interpretation of medicinal and recreational drugs, other chemicals or poisons, and their metabolites in biological matrices. Chromatography, combined with mass spectrometry (MS), is the most widely used analytical technique. However, forensic toxicology faces increasing analytical challenges due to a continuously changing drug landscape. In particular, the emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has driven the development of more complex analytical methods (e.g., high-resolution mass spectrometry), novel markers (e.g., metabolomics), or innovative screening approaches (e.g., activity-based), which collectively generate vast amounts of data. These challenges include rapid market dynamics with the constant emergence of new chemical scaffolds and modifications, complex fragmentation and metabolic behavior, and limited or delayed access to reference materials- These developments are not limited to NPS alone. Consequently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have increasingly found their way into forensic toxicology. This review discusses various applications of ML methods related to bioanalysis, metabolomics, and toxicodynamics in the context of forensic toxicology. Currently, a major limitation is the compilation of sufficiently large and suitable datasets, which is often constrained by limited availability of real case data, inhomogeneous analytical data, in vivo study designs with small group size (< 10 animals per group), or a low number of included substances. Ultimately, the quality of an ML model relies not only on data quality but also on a thorough understanding of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology, medical case history, and ML design, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in these studies.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law.
The journal publishes:
Case Reports
Commentaries
Letters to the Editor
Original Research Papers (Regular Papers)
Rapid Communications
Review Articles
Technical Notes.