Innovation-economic trade-offs:A perspective of low-carbon policy intensity

IF 4.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Economic Modelling Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2026.107527
Hao Wang , Li-Jing Liu
{"title":"Innovation-economic trade-offs:A perspective of low-carbon policy intensity","authors":"Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Li-Jing Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2026.107527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing literature emphasizes low-carbon policy implementation and benefits but overlooks intensity effects and trade-offs. This study introduces a low-carbon policy intensity index, a composite indicator of stringency and prioritization, to analyze the effects of policy intensity on city-level carbon total factor productivity and identify potential trade-offs. The analysis demonstrates spatial heterogeneity in policy effectiveness, with less-developed, resource-dependent, and small cities exhibiting heightened responsiveness to rigorous measures. Key mechanisms include green technology innovation and efficiency catch-up effects. However, two trade-offs emerge: (1) innovation tends to prioritize quantity over quality; (2) industrial restructuring generates short-term economic transition pressures. Scenario analysis shows that economic structural adjustment—particularly electricity optimization can mitigate these dilemmas by sustaining growth while curbing emissions. These findings demonstrate that shifting from nominal policy adoption to structural reforms and optimized intensity is key to balancing economic and environmental goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107527"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999326000568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing literature emphasizes low-carbon policy implementation and benefits but overlooks intensity effects and trade-offs. This study introduces a low-carbon policy intensity index, a composite indicator of stringency and prioritization, to analyze the effects of policy intensity on city-level carbon total factor productivity and identify potential trade-offs. The analysis demonstrates spatial heterogeneity in policy effectiveness, with less-developed, resource-dependent, and small cities exhibiting heightened responsiveness to rigorous measures. Key mechanisms include green technology innovation and efficiency catch-up effects. However, two trade-offs emerge: (1) innovation tends to prioritize quantity over quality; (2) industrial restructuring generates short-term economic transition pressures. Scenario analysis shows that economic structural adjustment—particularly electricity optimization can mitigate these dilemmas by sustaining growth while curbing emissions. These findings demonstrate that shifting from nominal policy adoption to structural reforms and optimized intensity is key to balancing economic and environmental goals.
创新与经济的权衡:低碳政策强度的视角
现有文献强调低碳政策的实施和效益,但忽视了强度效应和权衡。本研究引入低碳政策强度指数,即政策严格度和优先度的复合指标,分析政策强度对城市碳全要素生产率的影响,并识别潜在的权衡。分析表明,政策有效性存在空间异质性,欠发达、资源依赖型和小城市对严格措施的响应程度更高。关键机制包括绿色技术创新和效率追赶效应。然而,存在两种权衡:(1)创新倾向于优先考虑数量而不是质量;(2)产业结构调整产生短期经济转型压力。情景分析表明,经济结构调整——特别是电力优化——可以在保持增长的同时抑制排放,从而缓解这些困境。这些发现表明,从名义上的政策采纳转向结构改革和优化强度是平衡经济和环境目标的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书