{"title":"Beyond fixed thresholds: trend surface modeling of geochemical anomalies in the Shadan porphyry gold–copper deposit, eastern Iran","authors":"Hamid Geranian , Davood Raeisi , Saeid Hajsadeghi","doi":"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2026.107160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Shadan porphyry Au–Cu deposit in eastern Iran has undergone significant erosion, yielding mostly low-grade surface geochemical signatures and a mixture of porphyry- and epithermal-style mineralization. Under such conditions, conventional contouring with a single threshold fails to resolve geochemical anomalies reliably. To overcome this limitation, we applied six trend surface functions-linear, quadratic, cubic polynomials, spline, logistic, and Fourier—to lithogeochemical data (480 rock samples) and generated corresponding trend and residual maps for Au and Cu. Model performance was evaluated against the mineralization production index (derived from 20,111 drill-core assays from 93 boreholes) and the mapped geology. Results show that spline, Fourier, and logistic functions most effectively capture the mineralization trend, while their residual maps amplify anomaly intensity and areal extent by roughly two- to three-fold, improving delineation of mineralized zones. Simpler first- and second-order polynomials are adequate for straightforward mineralization patterns, whereas cubic polynomials and logistic functions provide greater accuracy in moderately complex settings. For multi-stage and telescope mineralization systems such as Shadan, spline and Fourier models are the most suitable. These findings demonstrate that trend–residual decomposition provides a more robust alternative to fixed-threshold mapping for anomaly-background separation in porphyry exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19644,"journal":{"name":"Ore Geology Reviews","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 107160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore Geology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136826000594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Shadan porphyry Au–Cu deposit in eastern Iran has undergone significant erosion, yielding mostly low-grade surface geochemical signatures and a mixture of porphyry- and epithermal-style mineralization. Under such conditions, conventional contouring with a single threshold fails to resolve geochemical anomalies reliably. To overcome this limitation, we applied six trend surface functions-linear, quadratic, cubic polynomials, spline, logistic, and Fourier—to lithogeochemical data (480 rock samples) and generated corresponding trend and residual maps for Au and Cu. Model performance was evaluated against the mineralization production index (derived from 20,111 drill-core assays from 93 boreholes) and the mapped geology. Results show that spline, Fourier, and logistic functions most effectively capture the mineralization trend, while their residual maps amplify anomaly intensity and areal extent by roughly two- to three-fold, improving delineation of mineralized zones. Simpler first- and second-order polynomials are adequate for straightforward mineralization patterns, whereas cubic polynomials and logistic functions provide greater accuracy in moderately complex settings. For multi-stage and telescope mineralization systems such as Shadan, spline and Fourier models are the most suitable. These findings demonstrate that trend–residual decomposition provides a more robust alternative to fixed-threshold mapping for anomaly-background separation in porphyry exploration.
期刊介绍:
Ore Geology Reviews aims to familiarize all earth scientists with recent advances in a number of interconnected disciplines related to the study of, and search for, ore deposits. The reviews range from brief to longer contributions, but the journal preferentially publishes manuscripts that fill the niche between the commonly shorter journal articles and the comprehensive book coverages, and thus has a special appeal to many authors and readers.