Three-stage ranking mechanism: A decision-making fusion of regret psychology and criterion-oriented three-way decision

IF 2.8 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Zhenni Ding , Kai Zhang , Haibo Jiang , Ligang Zhou
{"title":"Three-stage ranking mechanism: A decision-making fusion of regret psychology and criterion-oriented three-way decision","authors":"Zhenni Ding ,&nbsp;Kai Zhang ,&nbsp;Haibo Jiang ,&nbsp;Ligang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2026.109641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exploring the application of the three-way decision model in multi-criteria ranking problems from the perspective of criterion-oriented fuzzy concept has emerged as a promising research direction in the current three-way multi-criteria decision-making system. This direction aims to fully meet the decision-maker’s fundamental need and achieve a comprehensive ranking of all objects. However, since the difference between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object may be negative, the existing criterion-oriented three-way decision model, due to its inability to effectively handle negative value, poses a risk of deviation in overall ranking results. To address this issue, this paper introduces regret theory to transform this difference into a regret-rejoice value for decision-maker, thereby constructing a novel criterion-oriented three-way decision model and further proposing a three-stage ranking mechanism. Firstly, all objects are preliminarily classified qualitatively based on the relative magnitude relationship between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object, resulting in the division of four object subsets. Secondly, the constructed criterion-oriented three-way decision model, combined with weight aggregation method, is employed to determine the internal ranking relationships within these four subsets. Notably, in this three-way decision model, a calculation method for relative loss functions with precision control and a calculation method for conditional probability based on fuzzy clustering results are proposed. Finally, the ranking among subsets is determined by considering the semantic relationships between them, and the overall ranking of all objects is obtained by integrating the internal ranking results of subsets. Through numerical analysis, comparative analysis, and experimental verification, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed three-stage ranking mechanism are fully demonstrated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 109641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X26000174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploring the application of the three-way decision model in multi-criteria ranking problems from the perspective of criterion-oriented fuzzy concept has emerged as a promising research direction in the current three-way multi-criteria decision-making system. This direction aims to fully meet the decision-maker’s fundamental need and achieve a comprehensive ranking of all objects. However, since the difference between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object may be negative, the existing criterion-oriented three-way decision model, due to its inability to effectively handle negative value, poses a risk of deviation in overall ranking results. To address this issue, this paper introduces regret theory to transform this difference into a regret-rejoice value for decision-maker, thereby constructing a novel criterion-oriented three-way decision model and further proposing a three-stage ranking mechanism. Firstly, all objects are preliminarily classified qualitatively based on the relative magnitude relationship between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object, resulting in the division of four object subsets. Secondly, the constructed criterion-oriented three-way decision model, combined with weight aggregation method, is employed to determine the internal ranking relationships within these four subsets. Notably, in this three-way decision model, a calculation method for relative loss functions with precision control and a calculation method for conditional probability based on fuzzy clustering results are proposed. Finally, the ranking among subsets is determined by considering the semantic relationships between them, and the overall ranking of all objects is obtained by integrating the internal ranking results of subsets. Through numerical analysis, comparative analysis, and experimental verification, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed three-stage ranking mechanism are fully demonstrated.
三阶段排序机制:后悔心理与标准导向的三向决策融合
从面向准则的模糊概念角度探索三向决策模型在多准则排序问题中的应用,已成为当前三向多准则决策系统中一个很有前景的研究方向。该方向旨在充分满足决策者的根本需求,实现对所有对象的综合排序。然而,由于面向准则的模糊概念与对象的准则评价值之间的差值可能为负值,现有面向准则的三向决策模型由于无法有效处理负值,存在整体排序结果出现偏差的风险。针对这一问题,本文引入后悔理论,将这种差异转化为决策者的后悔-高兴值,从而构建了一种新的面向准则的三向决策模型,并进一步提出了三阶段排序机制。首先,根据面向准则的模糊概念与目标的准则评价值之间的相对大小关系,对所有目标进行初步定性分类,划分出4个目标子集;其次,构建面向准则的三向决策模型,结合权值聚合法确定四个子集内部的排序关系;值得注意的是,在该三向决策模型中,提出了一种精确控制相对损失函数的计算方法和一种基于模糊聚类结果的条件概率计算方法。最后,通过考虑子集之间的语义关系来确定子集之间的排序,并通过整合子集内部排序结果得到所有对象的总体排序。通过数值分析、对比分析和实验验证,充分证明了所提出的三阶段排序机制的有效性和优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书