{"title":"Three-stage ranking mechanism: A decision-making fusion of regret psychology and criterion-oriented three-way decision","authors":"Zhenni Ding , Kai Zhang , Haibo Jiang , Ligang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2026.109641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exploring the application of the three-way decision model in multi-criteria ranking problems from the perspective of criterion-oriented fuzzy concept has emerged as a promising research direction in the current three-way multi-criteria decision-making system. This direction aims to fully meet the decision-maker’s fundamental need and achieve a comprehensive ranking of all objects. However, since the difference between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object may be negative, the existing criterion-oriented three-way decision model, due to its inability to effectively handle negative value, poses a risk of deviation in overall ranking results. To address this issue, this paper introduces regret theory to transform this difference into a regret-rejoice value for decision-maker, thereby constructing a novel criterion-oriented three-way decision model and further proposing a three-stage ranking mechanism. Firstly, all objects are preliminarily classified qualitatively based on the relative magnitude relationship between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object, resulting in the division of four object subsets. Secondly, the constructed criterion-oriented three-way decision model, combined with weight aggregation method, is employed to determine the internal ranking relationships within these four subsets. Notably, in this three-way decision model, a calculation method for relative loss functions with precision control and a calculation method for conditional probability based on fuzzy clustering results are proposed. Finally, the ranking among subsets is determined by considering the semantic relationships between them, and the overall ranking of all objects is obtained by integrating the internal ranking results of subsets. Through numerical analysis, comparative analysis, and experimental verification, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed three-stage ranking mechanism are fully demonstrated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 109641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X26000174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Exploring the application of the three-way decision model in multi-criteria ranking problems from the perspective of criterion-oriented fuzzy concept has emerged as a promising research direction in the current three-way multi-criteria decision-making system. This direction aims to fully meet the decision-maker’s fundamental need and achieve a comprehensive ranking of all objects. However, since the difference between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object may be negative, the existing criterion-oriented three-way decision model, due to its inability to effectively handle negative value, poses a risk of deviation in overall ranking results. To address this issue, this paper introduces regret theory to transform this difference into a regret-rejoice value for decision-maker, thereby constructing a novel criterion-oriented three-way decision model and further proposing a three-stage ranking mechanism. Firstly, all objects are preliminarily classified qualitatively based on the relative magnitude relationship between the criterion-oriented fuzzy concept and the criterion evaluation value of a object, resulting in the division of four object subsets. Secondly, the constructed criterion-oriented three-way decision model, combined with weight aggregation method, is employed to determine the internal ranking relationships within these four subsets. Notably, in this three-way decision model, a calculation method for relative loss functions with precision control and a calculation method for conditional probability based on fuzzy clustering results are proposed. Finally, the ranking among subsets is determined by considering the semantic relationships between them, and the overall ranking of all objects is obtained by integrating the internal ranking results of subsets. Through numerical analysis, comparative analysis, and experimental verification, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed three-stage ranking mechanism are fully demonstrated.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest.
Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning.
Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.