A similarity degree-based three-way decision method with application to mine potential evaluation

IF 2.8 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Tianli Su, Yanling Bao
{"title":"A similarity degree-based three-way decision method with application to mine potential evaluation","authors":"Tianli Su,&nbsp;Yanling Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2026.109639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many existing interval-valued three-way decision methods primarily rely on crisp similarity assessments. Besides, they usually focus on single-objective modeling based on utility maximization or loss minimization, which may lead to conservative and biased outcomes. To address these issues, this paper develops a similarity degree-based interval-valued three-way decision method that integrates utilities and losses within a unified framework. Specifically, we define similarity degrees between interval values by a distance function, and further derive similarity-driven conditional probabilities, relative utility and loss functions. On this basis, we compute expected utilities and expected losses. Furthermore, we combine them via a risk-preference coefficient to obtain the expected values of alternatives, which can be used to reasonably categorize and rank alternatives. Moreover, the proposed method is applied in mine potential evaluation, and the evaluation results exhibit a high level of agreement with practical exploitation outcomes. What’s more, comparative analyses and sensitivity experiments further confirm that the method achieves more accurate and robust decision performance than some representative methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 109639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X26000150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many existing interval-valued three-way decision methods primarily rely on crisp similarity assessments. Besides, they usually focus on single-objective modeling based on utility maximization or loss minimization, which may lead to conservative and biased outcomes. To address these issues, this paper develops a similarity degree-based interval-valued three-way decision method that integrates utilities and losses within a unified framework. Specifically, we define similarity degrees between interval values by a distance function, and further derive similarity-driven conditional probabilities, relative utility and loss functions. On this basis, we compute expected utilities and expected losses. Furthermore, we combine them via a risk-preference coefficient to obtain the expected values of alternatives, which can be used to reasonably categorize and rank alternatives. Moreover, the proposed method is applied in mine potential evaluation, and the evaluation results exhibit a high level of agreement with practical exploitation outcomes. What’s more, comparative analyses and sensitivity experiments further confirm that the method achieves more accurate and robust decision performance than some representative methods.
基于相似度的三向决策方法及其在矿山潜力评价中的应用
许多现有的区间值三向决策方法主要依赖于清晰的相似性评估。此外,它们通常侧重于基于效用最大化或损失最小化的单目标建模,这可能导致结果保守和偏倚。为了解决这些问题,本文开发了一种基于相似度的区间值三向决策方法,该方法将效用和损失集成在一个统一的框架内。具体来说,我们通过距离函数定义了区间值之间的相似度,并进一步导出了相似驱动的条件概率、相对效用和损失函数。在此基础上,我们计算预期效用和预期损失。然后,通过风险偏好系数将二者组合,得到备选方案的期望值,从而对备选方案进行合理的分类和排序。并将该方法应用于矿山潜力评价,评价结果与实际开采结果吻合度较高。对比分析和灵敏度实验进一步证实了该方法比一些代表性方法具有更高的准确性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书