Land as destiny: How grassland inheritance drives income inequality in pastoral China

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104058
Hefei Bai , Zhijian Yu
{"title":"Land as destiny: How grassland inheritance drives income inequality in pastoral China","authors":"Hefei Bai ,&nbsp;Zhijian Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's 1980s grassland tenure reform allocated long-term, heritable use rights to pastoral households, creating a durable form of inherited wealth. This paper examines the long-term consequences of that foundational allocation and quantifies how its inheritance shapes contemporary income inequality. Using household survey data from China's pastoral regions and an instrumental variable strategy, we identify a causal link between historically allocated grassland area and present-day income. A 1% increase in historical allocation raises current income by 0.119%. We find this effect operates primarily through two pathways: pastoral production income and area-based ecological subsidies. Our heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the inheritance grassland area shapes income inequality. The income effect is statistically insignificant for households that inherited small allocations, possibly because their holdings fall below a viable production scale. Significant returns appear only among households with the largest allocations, creating a scale-dependent return structure that contributes to current inequality. The analysis also highlights the mitigating role of the grassland rental market. Households that rent in grassland (typically those with smaller historical allocations) can expand to an economically viable scale, weakening the intergenerational link between historical allocations and income.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104058"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's 1980s grassland tenure reform allocated long-term, heritable use rights to pastoral households, creating a durable form of inherited wealth. This paper examines the long-term consequences of that foundational allocation and quantifies how its inheritance shapes contemporary income inequality. Using household survey data from China's pastoral regions and an instrumental variable strategy, we identify a causal link between historically allocated grassland area and present-day income. A 1% increase in historical allocation raises current income by 0.119%. We find this effect operates primarily through two pathways: pastoral production income and area-based ecological subsidies. Our heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the inheritance grassland area shapes income inequality. The income effect is statistically insignificant for households that inherited small allocations, possibly because their holdings fall below a viable production scale. Significant returns appear only among households with the largest allocations, creating a scale-dependent return structure that contributes to current inequality. The analysis also highlights the mitigating role of the grassland rental market. Households that rent in grassland (typically those with smaller historical allocations) can expand to an economically viable scale, weakening the intergenerational link between historical allocations and income.
土地是命运:草原继承如何导致中国牧区的收入不平等
中国上世纪80年代的草原权属改革将长期的、可继承的使用权分配给了牧户,创造了一种持久的继承财富形式。本文研究了这种基本分配的长期后果,并量化了其继承如何塑造当代收入不平等。利用来自中国牧区的家庭调查数据和工具变量策略,我们确定了历史上分配的草原面积与当前收入之间的因果关系。历史配置每增加1%,当前收入就会增加0.119%。我们发现这种效应主要通过两种途径发挥作用:畜牧生产收入和基于区域的生态补贴。异质性分析表明,继承草原面积影响收入不平等。对于继承了少量分配的家庭,收入效应在统计上不显著,可能是因为他们的财产低于可行的生产规模。显著的回报只出现在拥有最大分配的家庭中,创造了一种依赖规模的回报结构,导致了当前的不平等。分析还强调了草原租赁市场的缓解作用。在草原上租房的家庭(通常是那些历史分配较少的家庭)可以扩大到经济上可行的规模,从而削弱了历史分配与收入之间的代际联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书