Gender differences in mobility among rural residents: Evidence from Guiyang, Western China

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104059
Yueren He, Mingwei He, Jiayou Lei, Yang Liu, Baohong He
{"title":"Gender differences in mobility among rural residents: Evidence from Guiyang, Western China","authors":"Yueren He,&nbsp;Mingwei He,&nbsp;Jiayou Lei,&nbsp;Yang Liu,&nbsp;Baohong He","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mobility is an important dimension of residents' quality of life. Although studies report higher mobility among rural males, binary gender analyses often miss nuances of gender roles across social contexts. Using Guiyang's 2021 household travel survey, this study examines gender differences in travel distance and daily travel mode among rural residents, including non-trip-makers during the survey period. Descriptive statistics indicate that males travel farther and have a higher share of car use, whereas females record more walk/bike. We further examine the intersection of gender with education, employment, family structure (child status), and household vehicle ownership. A two-part Gamma model and a multinomial logit model are employed to analyze average travel distance and daily travel mode, respectively. Outcome-scale predictions show that females are significantly less likely than comparable males to make trips. The trip-making gender gap is smaller in the high-school-or-above group than in the elementary-or-below group. It is also smaller in the off-farm than in the on-farm group. For travel distance, females travel less than males in both conditional mean distance and per-capita daily distance, but the conditional-mean gap is not statistically significant in some subgroups, such as those without children or without car ownership. Mode-choice estimates reveal a consistent within-group pattern: within groups sharing the same attributes, females are significantly more likely to choose walk/bike than their male counterparts, while males are more likely to choose cars. These findings characterize multidimensional gender differences in rural mobility and underscore heterogeneity across socioeconomic contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104059"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobility is an important dimension of residents' quality of life. Although studies report higher mobility among rural males, binary gender analyses often miss nuances of gender roles across social contexts. Using Guiyang's 2021 household travel survey, this study examines gender differences in travel distance and daily travel mode among rural residents, including non-trip-makers during the survey period. Descriptive statistics indicate that males travel farther and have a higher share of car use, whereas females record more walk/bike. We further examine the intersection of gender with education, employment, family structure (child status), and household vehicle ownership. A two-part Gamma model and a multinomial logit model are employed to analyze average travel distance and daily travel mode, respectively. Outcome-scale predictions show that females are significantly less likely than comparable males to make trips. The trip-making gender gap is smaller in the high-school-or-above group than in the elementary-or-below group. It is also smaller in the off-farm than in the on-farm group. For travel distance, females travel less than males in both conditional mean distance and per-capita daily distance, but the conditional-mean gap is not statistically significant in some subgroups, such as those without children or without car ownership. Mode-choice estimates reveal a consistent within-group pattern: within groups sharing the same attributes, females are significantly more likely to choose walk/bike than their male counterparts, while males are more likely to choose cars. These findings characterize multidimensional gender differences in rural mobility and underscore heterogeneity across socioeconomic contexts.
农村居民流动的性别差异:来自贵阳的证据
流动性是居民生活质量的一个重要维度。尽管研究表明农村男性的流动性更高,但二元性别分析往往忽略了社会背景下性别角色的细微差别。本研究利用贵阳市2021年家庭出行调查,考察了调查期间农村居民(包括非出行者)出行距离和日常出行方式的性别差异。描述性统计表明,男性出行距离更远,使用汽车的比例更高,而女性则更多地步行/骑自行车。我们进一步研究了性别与教育、就业、家庭结构(儿童状况)和家庭车辆拥有量的交叉关系。分别采用两部分Gamma模型和多项logit模型对平均出行距离和日出行模式进行分析。结果尺度预测显示,女性出行的可能性明显低于可比较的男性。高中及以上学历群体的出行性别差距小于小学及以下学历群体。此外,非农人口的失业率也低于在岗人口。对于出行距离,女性在条件平均距离和人均每日距离上都比男性少,但在一些亚组中,如没有孩子或没有汽车的亚组,条件平均差距在统计上并不显著。模式选择估计揭示了群体内一致的模式:在具有相同属性的群体中,女性明显比男性更倾向于选择步行/骑自行车,而男性更倾向于选择汽车。这些发现描述了农村人口流动中的多维性别差异,并强调了社会经济背景的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书