{"title":"What makes Farmer Producer Organizations work? A multi-level analysis of performance determinants in India","authors":"Swati Singh , Akriti Sharma , Alka Singh , K.V. Praveen , Harbir Singh , Pavan Kumar Kumawat","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite significant institutional investment in Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) across India, questions remain about what drives their long-term performance. This study explores the determinants of performance in high-functioning FPOs by integrating Collective Action, Institutional, and Stakeholder theories into a multi-level analytical framework. Drawing on qualitative data from five high-performing FPOs—selected through participatory performance criteria and snowball sampling—the study employs in-depth interviews with CEOs, Board members, and three farmer members from each selected FPOs, supported by document analysis and field observations.</div><div>Findings identify six interlocking determinants of FPO performance: transparent communication, group cohesion and conflict resolution, institutional complementarity, capital diversification, embedded leadership, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. These are organized across micro-, meso-, and macro-levels, demonstrating how interpersonal trust, organizational alignment, and ecosystem responsiveness co-produce sustainable collective enterprise.</div><div>The study contributes theoretically by extending collective action theory to digital and relational infrastructures, refining Institutional theory through local adaptation strategies, and enriching Stakeholder theory by foregrounding legitimacy as a dynamic, participatory construct. A visual framework is proposed to represent this integrative perspective.</div><div>Policy recommendations emphasize the need for embedded leadership development, capital diversification incentives, community-responsive communication systems, and norm-rule alignment in program design. By offering a field-grounded and theory-informed account of FPO performance, the study advances scholarship on rural collective action and provides actionable insights for policymakers and promoting institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104014"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000161","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite significant institutional investment in Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) across India, questions remain about what drives their long-term performance. This study explores the determinants of performance in high-functioning FPOs by integrating Collective Action, Institutional, and Stakeholder theories into a multi-level analytical framework. Drawing on qualitative data from five high-performing FPOs—selected through participatory performance criteria and snowball sampling—the study employs in-depth interviews with CEOs, Board members, and three farmer members from each selected FPOs, supported by document analysis and field observations.
Findings identify six interlocking determinants of FPO performance: transparent communication, group cohesion and conflict resolution, institutional complementarity, capital diversification, embedded leadership, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. These are organized across micro-, meso-, and macro-levels, demonstrating how interpersonal trust, organizational alignment, and ecosystem responsiveness co-produce sustainable collective enterprise.
The study contributes theoretically by extending collective action theory to digital and relational infrastructures, refining Institutional theory through local adaptation strategies, and enriching Stakeholder theory by foregrounding legitimacy as a dynamic, participatory construct. A visual framework is proposed to represent this integrative perspective.
Policy recommendations emphasize the need for embedded leadership development, capital diversification incentives, community-responsive communication systems, and norm-rule alignment in program design. By offering a field-grounded and theory-informed account of FPO performance, the study advances scholarship on rural collective action and provides actionable insights for policymakers and promoting institutions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.