Behind the mask of love: Associations among dark triad traits, attachment avoidance and anxiety, romantic beliefs, and intimacy expectations

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2026.113692
Silvija Ručević, Josipa Antunović
{"title":"Behind the mask of love: Associations among dark triad traits, attachment avoidance and anxiety, romantic beliefs, and intimacy expectations","authors":"Silvija Ručević,&nbsp;Josipa Antunović","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined how Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy), attachment orientations, and romantic beliefs predict intimacy expectations in romantic relationships, while considering potential moderating effects of age and gender. A community sample of 900 adults (56% women; age range = 18–74 years) in intimate relationship completed measures of Dark Triad traits, attachment anxiety and avoidance, idealized romantic beliefs, and expectations for intimacy. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that Machiavellianism was the strongest Dark Triad predictor of lower intimacy expectations, while narcissism showed a weak positive suppression effect after controlling for Machiavellianism, and psychopathy provided no unique contribution. Relational factors were stronger predictors, with avoidant attachment negatively and idealized romantic beliefs positively predicting intimacy expectations. Moderation analyses indicated that the negative link between Machiavellianism and intimacy expectations was significantly moderated by age and gender, such that older women high in Machiavellianism reported the lowest intimacy expectations, whereas younger women and men across all ages showed a more stable pattern. In contrast, narcissism and psychopathy exhibited no demographic moderation. Overall, these findings highlight that both personality traits and relational schemas shape intimacy expectations, but their effects are modest. The study underscores the importance of integrating cognitive, personality, and demographic factors to better understand maladaptive relationship dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886926000553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined how Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy), attachment orientations, and romantic beliefs predict intimacy expectations in romantic relationships, while considering potential moderating effects of age and gender. A community sample of 900 adults (56% women; age range = 18–74 years) in intimate relationship completed measures of Dark Triad traits, attachment anxiety and avoidance, idealized romantic beliefs, and expectations for intimacy. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that Machiavellianism was the strongest Dark Triad predictor of lower intimacy expectations, while narcissism showed a weak positive suppression effect after controlling for Machiavellianism, and psychopathy provided no unique contribution. Relational factors were stronger predictors, with avoidant attachment negatively and idealized romantic beliefs positively predicting intimacy expectations. Moderation analyses indicated that the negative link between Machiavellianism and intimacy expectations was significantly moderated by age and gender, such that older women high in Machiavellianism reported the lowest intimacy expectations, whereas younger women and men across all ages showed a more stable pattern. In contrast, narcissism and psychopathy exhibited no demographic moderation. Overall, these findings highlight that both personality traits and relational schemas shape intimacy expectations, but their effects are modest. The study underscores the importance of integrating cognitive, personality, and demographic factors to better understand maladaptive relationship dynamics.
爱的面具背后:黑暗三合一特质、依恋回避和焦虑、浪漫信仰和亲密期望之间的联系
这项研究考察了黑暗三位一体特征(马基雅维利主义、自恋和精神病)、依恋取向和浪漫信仰如何预测浪漫关系中的亲密期望,同时考虑到年龄和性别的潜在调节作用。一个由900名处于亲密关系中的成年人组成的社区样本(56%为女性,年龄范围为18-74岁)完成了黑暗三合一特征、依恋焦虑和回避、理想化的浪漫信仰和对亲密关系的期望的测量。层次回归分析显示,马基雅维利主义是最强大的黑暗人格特质预测因子,而自恋在控制马基雅维利主义后表现出微弱的正向抑制效应,而精神病没有独特的贡献。关系因素是更强的预测因子,逃避型依恋负向,理想化的浪漫信念正向预测亲密期望。适度分析表明,马基雅维利主义与亲密期望之间的负相关关系受到年龄和性别的显著调节,例如,马基雅维利主义程度高的老年女性报告的亲密期望最低,而所有年龄段的年轻女性和男性则表现出更稳定的模式。相比之下,自恋和精神病没有表现出人口统计学上的温和性。总的来说,这些发现强调了人格特质和关系图式都塑造了亲密期望,但它们的影响是适度的。该研究强调了整合认知、个性和人口因素的重要性,以更好地理解适应不良的关系动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书