{"title":"Has the “Three-Child Policy” also encountered reluctance in rural China?—evidence from new-generation women of childbearing age in western rural China","authors":"Jian Lan , Xingchao Hu , Zihan Li , Yuhao Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Historically, rural fertility intentions in China exceeded those of urban areas. Drawing on 90 semi-structured interviews with new-generation rural women across nine western villages, this study identifies a marked shift toward persistently low intentions and widespread reluctance regarding third births under the Three-Child Policy. Three patterns emerge. First, a consolidated two-child norm, accompanied by explicit rejection of a third birth. Second, intensifying “multi-son anxiety” shaped by marriage-market pressures—high bride prices, housing expectations, and the financial risks associated with raising sons. Third, a growing turn toward individualised life orientations that prioritise parenting quality and personal well-being over patrilineal continuity or numerical ideals of family size. These transformations reflect heightened female autonomy alongside the economic, temporal and emotional costs of childrearing, heavy caregiving demands, parental burnout and anxieties about providing high-quality upbringing. Our findings highlight a structural mismatch between state pronatalist initiatives and women's lived aspirations. The analysis points to the need to transform the broader environment in which reproductive decisions are made—through reducing financial pressures, strengthening rural childcare and education support, and reshaping gendered care arrangements—if women's own preferences and life goals are to be meaningfully respected. The study thus foregrounds aspirations and constraints, offering an empirically grounded account of why third births remain undesirable for rural new-generation women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104039"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Historically, rural fertility intentions in China exceeded those of urban areas. Drawing on 90 semi-structured interviews with new-generation rural women across nine western villages, this study identifies a marked shift toward persistently low intentions and widespread reluctance regarding third births under the Three-Child Policy. Three patterns emerge. First, a consolidated two-child norm, accompanied by explicit rejection of a third birth. Second, intensifying “multi-son anxiety” shaped by marriage-market pressures—high bride prices, housing expectations, and the financial risks associated with raising sons. Third, a growing turn toward individualised life orientations that prioritise parenting quality and personal well-being over patrilineal continuity or numerical ideals of family size. These transformations reflect heightened female autonomy alongside the economic, temporal and emotional costs of childrearing, heavy caregiving demands, parental burnout and anxieties about providing high-quality upbringing. Our findings highlight a structural mismatch between state pronatalist initiatives and women's lived aspirations. The analysis points to the need to transform the broader environment in which reproductive decisions are made—through reducing financial pressures, strengthening rural childcare and education support, and reshaping gendered care arrangements—if women's own preferences and life goals are to be meaningfully respected. The study thus foregrounds aspirations and constraints, offering an empirically grounded account of why third births remain undesirable for rural new-generation women.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.