Revisiting data-driven approaches for methane and hydrogen production prediction with emphasis on explainability, applicability, and industrial implications

IF 6.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Journal of The Energy Institute Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1016/j.joei.2025.102205
Chiagoziem C. Ukwuoma , Dongsheng Cai , Chibueze D. Ukwuoma , Chinedu I. Otuka , Ibrahim Kunle Adefarati , Huan Yang , Olusola Bamisile , Qi Huang
{"title":"Revisiting data-driven approaches for methane and hydrogen production prediction with emphasis on explainability, applicability, and industrial implications","authors":"Chiagoziem C. Ukwuoma ,&nbsp;Dongsheng Cai ,&nbsp;Chibueze D. Ukwuoma ,&nbsp;Chinedu I. Otuka ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Kunle Adefarati ,&nbsp;Huan Yang ,&nbsp;Olusola Bamisile ,&nbsp;Qi Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to enhance the accuracy, explainability, and industrial applicability of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) yield predictions in supercritical water gasification (SCWG), a promising method for biofuel production. Traditional approaches often lack precision and scalability, necessitating advanced data-driven solutions. We revisit machine learning (ML) models, focusing on hyperparameter optimisation (Grid Search, Random Search, Bayesian Optimisation), model explainability (LIME, SHAP, permutation importance), and industrial implications. Using SCWG data from Yimin lignite, six ML models and two ensembles were evaluated with MAE, RMSE, and R<sup>2</sup> metrics under 5-fold cross-validation. Random Forest outperformed others, achieving R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.995 for CH<sub>4</sub> and 1.00 for H<sub>2</sub>, with low errors. Explainability analyses identified temperature and CE as the most critical factors, while optimisation techniques showed minimal performance differences, supporting simpler optimisation techniques like Random search in resource-constrained settings. Williams plots confirmed robust applicability, with over 99.9 % of data points within acceptable ranges (±2 residuals and low leverage). These findings enhance SCWG process efficiency, reduce costs, and minimise environmental impacts, advancing sustainable energy solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 102205"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125002338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to enhance the accuracy, explainability, and industrial applicability of methane (CH4) and hydrogen (H2) yield predictions in supercritical water gasification (SCWG), a promising method for biofuel production. Traditional approaches often lack precision and scalability, necessitating advanced data-driven solutions. We revisit machine learning (ML) models, focusing on hyperparameter optimisation (Grid Search, Random Search, Bayesian Optimisation), model explainability (LIME, SHAP, permutation importance), and industrial implications. Using SCWG data from Yimin lignite, six ML models and two ensembles were evaluated with MAE, RMSE, and R2 metrics under 5-fold cross-validation. Random Forest outperformed others, achieving R2 values of 0.995 for CH4 and 1.00 for H2, with low errors. Explainability analyses identified temperature and CE as the most critical factors, while optimisation techniques showed minimal performance differences, supporting simpler optimisation techniques like Random search in resource-constrained settings. Williams plots confirmed robust applicability, with over 99.9 % of data points within acceptable ranges (±2 residuals and low leverage). These findings enhance SCWG process efficiency, reduce costs, and minimise environmental impacts, advancing sustainable energy solutions.

Abstract Image

重新审视数据驱动的甲烷和氢气产量预测方法,重点是可解释性、适用性和工业意义
本研究旨在提高超临界水气化(SCWG)中甲烷(CH4)和氢(H2)产率预测的准确性、可解释性和工业适用性,超临界水气化是一种很有前途的生物燃料生产方法。传统方法通常缺乏精确性和可伸缩性,因此需要先进的数据驱动解决方案。我们重新审视机器学习(ML)模型,重点关注超参数优化(网格搜索、随机搜索、贝叶斯优化)、模型可解释性(LIME、SHAP、排列重要性)和工业意义。利用益民褐煤SCWG数据,在5倍交叉验证下,使用MAE、RMSE和R2指标对6个ML模型和2个集合进行评估。随机森林表现较好,CH4的R2值为0.995,H2的R2值为1.00,误差较小。可解释性分析确定温度和CE是最关键的因素,而优化技术显示的性能差异最小,支持更简单的优化技术,如资源受限环境下的随机搜索。Williams图证实了强大的适用性,超过99.9%的数据点在可接受的范围内(±2残差和低杠杆)。这些发现提高了SCWG工艺效率,降低了成本,并最大限度地减少了对环境的影响,推动了可持续能源解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Energy Institute
Journal of The Energy Institute 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
166
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include: Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards; Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS; Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems Energy storage The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书