Revisiting data-driven approaches for methane and hydrogen production prediction with emphasis on explainability, applicability, and industrial implications
Chiagoziem C. Ukwuoma , Dongsheng Cai , Chibueze D. Ukwuoma , Chinedu I. Otuka , Ibrahim Kunle Adefarati , Huan Yang , Olusola Bamisile , Qi Huang
{"title":"Revisiting data-driven approaches for methane and hydrogen production prediction with emphasis on explainability, applicability, and industrial implications","authors":"Chiagoziem C. Ukwuoma , Dongsheng Cai , Chibueze D. Ukwuoma , Chinedu I. Otuka , Ibrahim Kunle Adefarati , Huan Yang , Olusola Bamisile , Qi Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to enhance the accuracy, explainability, and industrial applicability of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) yield predictions in supercritical water gasification (SCWG), a promising method for biofuel production. Traditional approaches often lack precision and scalability, necessitating advanced data-driven solutions. We revisit machine learning (ML) models, focusing on hyperparameter optimisation (Grid Search, Random Search, Bayesian Optimisation), model explainability (LIME, SHAP, permutation importance), and industrial implications. Using SCWG data from Yimin lignite, six ML models and two ensembles were evaluated with MAE, RMSE, and R<sup>2</sup> metrics under 5-fold cross-validation. Random Forest outperformed others, achieving R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.995 for CH<sub>4</sub> and 1.00 for H<sub>2</sub>, with low errors. Explainability analyses identified temperature and CE as the most critical factors, while optimisation techniques showed minimal performance differences, supporting simpler optimisation techniques like Random search in resource-constrained settings. Williams plots confirmed robust applicability, with over 99.9 % of data points within acceptable ranges (±2 residuals and low leverage). These findings enhance SCWG process efficiency, reduce costs, and minimise environmental impacts, advancing sustainable energy solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 102205"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125002338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to enhance the accuracy, explainability, and industrial applicability of methane (CH4) and hydrogen (H2) yield predictions in supercritical water gasification (SCWG), a promising method for biofuel production. Traditional approaches often lack precision and scalability, necessitating advanced data-driven solutions. We revisit machine learning (ML) models, focusing on hyperparameter optimisation (Grid Search, Random Search, Bayesian Optimisation), model explainability (LIME, SHAP, permutation importance), and industrial implications. Using SCWG data from Yimin lignite, six ML models and two ensembles were evaluated with MAE, RMSE, and R2 metrics under 5-fold cross-validation. Random Forest outperformed others, achieving R2 values of 0.995 for CH4 and 1.00 for H2, with low errors. Explainability analyses identified temperature and CE as the most critical factors, while optimisation techniques showed minimal performance differences, supporting simpler optimisation techniques like Random search in resource-constrained settings. Williams plots confirmed robust applicability, with over 99.9 % of data points within acceptable ranges (±2 residuals and low leverage). These findings enhance SCWG process efficiency, reduce costs, and minimise environmental impacts, advancing sustainable energy solutions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include:
Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies
Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards;
Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS;
Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport
Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling
Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems
Energy storage
The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.