Assessing environmental and policy dimensions of LEED adoption in ready-made garments of Bangladesh: Drivers, barriers, and strategies for sustainable industrial green transformation

IF 5.2
Cleaner Waste Systems Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.clwas.2026.100488
Suruj Ali , Yead Arefin , Md. Saifur Rahman , Abdullah Al-Maruf
{"title":"Assessing environmental and policy dimensions of LEED adoption in ready-made garments of Bangladesh: Drivers, barriers, and strategies for sustainable industrial green transformation","authors":"Suruj Ali ,&nbsp;Yead Arefin ,&nbsp;Md. Saifur Rahman ,&nbsp;Abdullah Al-Maruf","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2026.100488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ready-made garment (RMG) sector is central to Bangladesh’s economy but remains a major source of environmental pressure. In response, a growing number of factories have adopted Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification as a strategy toward sustainable industrial transformation. However, evidence on why some factories adopt LEED while others do not remains limited, particularly in developing-country contexts. This study examines the drivers, barriers, and enabling conditions shaping LEED adoption in Bangladesh’s RMG sector using a factory-level mixed-methods approach. Primary data were collected from 21 RMG factories, combining structured surveys of factory personnel (n = 423) with key informant interviews (KIIs) involving managers, sustainability officers, and industry stakeholders. Individual survey responses were aggregated to the factory level, and analysis was conducted using descriptive, comparative, and pattern-based methods. Exploratory factor analysis was employed strictly as a measurement tool, while KIIs were used to triangulate and contextualize quantitative patterns. The findings show that LEED adoption is shaped not by isolated factors but by configurations of external market pressure, organizational commitment, financial capacity, and policy engagement. Buyer requirements and management commitment consistently emerge as central enabling conditions, while high upfront costs, limited access to green finance, and technical capacity constraints remain key barriers, particularly for smaller and non-export-oriented factories. Policy incentives and green financing mechanisms function as selective enablers rather than universal drivers, benefiting factories with stronger organizational readiness and external linkages. Overall, the study advances a configurational understanding of sustainability transitions in labor-intensive manufacturing and provides sector-indicative insights for designing more inclusive industrial sustainability policies in developing economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100488"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912526000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ready-made garment (RMG) sector is central to Bangladesh’s economy but remains a major source of environmental pressure. In response, a growing number of factories have adopted Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification as a strategy toward sustainable industrial transformation. However, evidence on why some factories adopt LEED while others do not remains limited, particularly in developing-country contexts. This study examines the drivers, barriers, and enabling conditions shaping LEED adoption in Bangladesh’s RMG sector using a factory-level mixed-methods approach. Primary data were collected from 21 RMG factories, combining structured surveys of factory personnel (n = 423) with key informant interviews (KIIs) involving managers, sustainability officers, and industry stakeholders. Individual survey responses were aggregated to the factory level, and analysis was conducted using descriptive, comparative, and pattern-based methods. Exploratory factor analysis was employed strictly as a measurement tool, while KIIs were used to triangulate and contextualize quantitative patterns. The findings show that LEED adoption is shaped not by isolated factors but by configurations of external market pressure, organizational commitment, financial capacity, and policy engagement. Buyer requirements and management commitment consistently emerge as central enabling conditions, while high upfront costs, limited access to green finance, and technical capacity constraints remain key barriers, particularly for smaller and non-export-oriented factories. Policy incentives and green financing mechanisms function as selective enablers rather than universal drivers, benefiting factories with stronger organizational readiness and external linkages. Overall, the study advances a configurational understanding of sustainability transitions in labor-intensive manufacturing and provides sector-indicative insights for designing more inclusive industrial sustainability policies in developing economies.
评估孟加拉国成衣采用LEED的环境和政策层面:可持续工业绿色转型的驱动因素、障碍和策略
成衣(RMG)行业是孟加拉国经济的核心,但仍然是环境压力的主要来源。作为回应,越来越多的工厂采用了能源与环境设计领导认证(LEED)作为可持续工业转型的战略。然而,关于为什么一些工厂采用LEED而另一些工厂不采用的证据仍然有限,特别是在发展中国家的背景下。本研究采用工厂级混合方法,考察了孟加拉国RMG行业采用LEED的驱动因素、障碍和有利条件。主要数据来自21家RMG工厂,结合对工厂人员的结构化调查(n = 423)和涉及管理人员、可持续发展官员和行业利益相关者的关键线人访谈(KIIs)。将个人调查结果汇总到工厂层面,并使用描述性、比较性和基于模式的方法进行分析。探索性因子分析被严格用作测量工具,而kii被用于三角测量和情景化定量模式。研究结果表明,LEED的采用不是由孤立的因素决定的,而是由外部市场压力、组织承诺、财务能力和政策参与的配置决定的。买方要求和管理层承诺始终是核心有利条件,而高昂的前期成本、获得绿色融资的渠道有限和技术能力限制仍然是主要障碍,特别是对小型和非出口导向型工厂而言。政策激励和绿色融资机制的作用是选择性的推动因素,而不是普遍的驱动因素,有利于组织准备和外部联系更强的工厂。总体而言,该研究促进了对劳动密集型制造业可持续性转型的构型理解,并为发展中经济体设计更具包容性的产业可持续性政策提供了行业指示性见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书