Comparative evaluation of composting and solarization techniques for mitigating antibiotic residues, and resistance genes in poultry manure

IF 3.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Scientific African Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2026.e03228
Paul Appiah Sekyere , David Azanu , Osei Akoto
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of composting and solarization techniques for mitigating antibiotic residues, and resistance genes in poultry manure","authors":"Paul Appiah Sekyere ,&nbsp;David Azanu ,&nbsp;Osei Akoto","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2026.e03228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The improper management of poultry waste poses a growing environmental and public health threat due to accumulation of antibiotic residues, pathogenic microorganisms, and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). This study investigated the effectiveness of composting, open solarization, and closed solarization in transforming poultry manure into safer, nutrient-rich material for agricultural use. Poultry waste mixed with sawdust (2:1 w/w) was treated over 60 days, with weekly monitoring of physicochemical properties, microbial load, and concentrations of tetracycline, sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, and neomycin sulphate. Composting achieved complete degradation (100%) of all antibiotics within 50 days. For closed solarisation, ampicillin was completely removed within 60 days, while the remaining antibiotics showed varying removal efficiencies. Antibiotic removal efficiencies for open solarization ranged from 93% to 97% within 60 days. Microbial loads declined significantly under composting and closed solarization, with composting reducing counts of <em>Escherichia coli</em> isolates from 1.15 × 10¹¹ CFU/mL to 9.29 × 10¹⁰ CFU/mL from untreated and early-stage compost samples. Antibiotic sensitivity tests revealed a reduction in ticarcillin-resistant <em>E. coli</em> from 50% to 17% post-treatment, and no new resistance was observed for amikacin, meropenem, and norfloxacin in composted samples. All treatments improved nutrient content, particularly potassium, which rose from 1.52% to 6.03% under composting. Statistical correlations show temperature and moisture significantly influenced antibiotic degradation and microbial reduction (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Closed solarization maintained better thermal and moisture conditions than open solarization, enhancing treatment efficacy. These results confirm composting and closed solarization as robust, climate-sensitive strategies for antibiotic residue mitigation, microbial safety, and sustainable nutrient recovery in poultry waste management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article e03228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227626000529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The improper management of poultry waste poses a growing environmental and public health threat due to accumulation of antibiotic residues, pathogenic microorganisms, and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). This study investigated the effectiveness of composting, open solarization, and closed solarization in transforming poultry manure into safer, nutrient-rich material for agricultural use. Poultry waste mixed with sawdust (2:1 w/w) was treated over 60 days, with weekly monitoring of physicochemical properties, microbial load, and concentrations of tetracycline, sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, and neomycin sulphate. Composting achieved complete degradation (100%) of all antibiotics within 50 days. For closed solarisation, ampicillin was completely removed within 60 days, while the remaining antibiotics showed varying removal efficiencies. Antibiotic removal efficiencies for open solarization ranged from 93% to 97% within 60 days. Microbial loads declined significantly under composting and closed solarization, with composting reducing counts of Escherichia coli isolates from 1.15 × 10¹¹ CFU/mL to 9.29 × 10¹⁰ CFU/mL from untreated and early-stage compost samples. Antibiotic sensitivity tests revealed a reduction in ticarcillin-resistant E. coli from 50% to 17% post-treatment, and no new resistance was observed for amikacin, meropenem, and norfloxacin in composted samples. All treatments improved nutrient content, particularly potassium, which rose from 1.52% to 6.03% under composting. Statistical correlations show temperature and moisture significantly influenced antibiotic degradation and microbial reduction (p < 0.05). Closed solarization maintained better thermal and moisture conditions than open solarization, enhancing treatment efficacy. These results confirm composting and closed solarization as robust, climate-sensitive strategies for antibiotic residue mitigation, microbial safety, and sustainable nutrient recovery in poultry waste management.
堆肥和日光技术对减轻家禽粪便中抗生素残留和抗性基因的比较评价
由于抗生素残留、病原微生物和抗菌素耐药基因(ARGs)的积累,家禽粪便管理不当对环境和公共卫生构成日益严重的威胁。本研究探讨了堆肥、开放式日光和封闭式日光在将家禽粪便转化为更安全、营养丰富的农业材料方面的有效性。与木屑混合的家禽粪便(2:1 w/w)处理60天,每周监测其理化性质、微生物负荷以及四环素、磺胺甲恶唑、氨苄西林和硫酸新霉素的浓度。堆肥在50天内实现所有抗生素的完全降解(100%)。对于封闭日晒,氨苄西林在60天内被完全去除,而剩余的抗生素表现出不同的去除效率。开放辐照60天内抗生素去除效率为93% ~ 97%。在堆肥和封闭日晒下,微生物负荷显著下降,堆肥使未经处理和早期堆肥样品的大肠杆菌分离株数量从1.15 × 10¹CFU/mL减少到9.29 × 10¹CFU/mL。抗生素敏感性试验显示,对替卡西林耐药的大肠杆菌在处理后从50%减少到17%,并且在堆肥样品中未观察到对阿米卡星、美罗培南和诺氟沙星的新耐药性。各处理均提高了土壤养分含量,其中钾含量最高,堆肥处理的土壤钾含量由1.52%提高到6.03%。统计相关性显示温度和湿度显著影响抗生素降解和微生物减少(p < 0.05)。封闭光照比开放光照保持了更好的热、湿条件,提高了处理效果。这些结果证实,堆肥和封闭日光是在家禽废物管理中减少抗生素残留、微生物安全性和可持续养分回收的强大的、气候敏感的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书