Deep reinforcement learning-driven ensemble framework for multi-target prediction of mechanical properties in additively manufactured parts using a small dataset

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Mohammad Hossein Nikzad , Mohammad Heidari-Rarani , Negin Sayyaf , Reza Rasti , Larry Lessard
{"title":"Deep reinforcement learning-driven ensemble framework for multi-target prediction of mechanical properties in additively manufactured parts using a small dataset","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Nikzad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Heidari-Rarani ,&nbsp;Negin Sayyaf ,&nbsp;Reza Rasti ,&nbsp;Larry Lessard","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechsol.2026.106041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Additive manufacturing of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) by fused deposition modelling (FDM) enables rapid fabrication but exhibits strong process–property sensitivity, motivating reliable multi-property prediction. Here, an accurate and explainable machine-learning framework is presented for the simultaneous prediction of Young's modulus (E) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of FDM-printed ABS. A dataset of 78 experimental data points was compiled from tensile tests, with nozzle temperature (220–250 °C), raster angle (0–90<sup>°</sup>), layer thickness (0.1–0.3 mm), printing speed (20–50 mm/s), and wall count (2–6) as inputs. Eight multi-output regressors were trained, and their hyperparameters were continuously tuned using deep reinforcement learning based on Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), and benchmarked against grid search, random search, and TPE-based Bayesian optimization. DDPG consistently improved generalisation; the best standalone model, XGBoost, achieved a test R<sup>2</sup> of 87.908 % with MAE of 0.269 and RMSE of 0.336. Ensemble learning was then investigated through simple averaging, weighted averaging, and stacking. The simple-average CatBoost–XGBoost ensemble delivered the highest test performance with R<sup>2</sup> of 88.735 %, MAE of 0.252, and RMSE of 0.322. Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank testing confirmed the statistical advantage of this ensemble over the leading alternatives. Finally, Shapley Additive Explanation SHAP analysis provided interpretability, identifying raster angle as the dominant driver for E, and wall count together with raster angle as the primary drivers for UTS, while printing speed showed the weakest influence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50483,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 106041"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics A-Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997753826000276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) by fused deposition modelling (FDM) enables rapid fabrication but exhibits strong process–property sensitivity, motivating reliable multi-property prediction. Here, an accurate and explainable machine-learning framework is presented for the simultaneous prediction of Young's modulus (E) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of FDM-printed ABS. A dataset of 78 experimental data points was compiled from tensile tests, with nozzle temperature (220–250 °C), raster angle (0–90°), layer thickness (0.1–0.3 mm), printing speed (20–50 mm/s), and wall count (2–6) as inputs. Eight multi-output regressors were trained, and their hyperparameters were continuously tuned using deep reinforcement learning based on Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), and benchmarked against grid search, random search, and TPE-based Bayesian optimization. DDPG consistently improved generalisation; the best standalone model, XGBoost, achieved a test R2 of 87.908 % with MAE of 0.269 and RMSE of 0.336. Ensemble learning was then investigated through simple averaging, weighted averaging, and stacking. The simple-average CatBoost–XGBoost ensemble delivered the highest test performance with R2 of 88.735 %, MAE of 0.252, and RMSE of 0.322. Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank testing confirmed the statistical advantage of this ensemble over the leading alternatives. Finally, Shapley Additive Explanation SHAP analysis provided interpretability, identifying raster angle as the dominant driver for E, and wall count together with raster angle as the primary drivers for UTS, while printing speed showed the weakest influence.

Abstract Image

基于小数据集的增材制造零件力学性能多目标预测的深度强化学习驱动集成框架
通过熔融沉积建模(FDM)增材制造丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)可以快速制造,但具有很强的工艺性能敏感性,可以实现可靠的多性能预测。本文提出了一个准确且可解释的机器学习框架,用于同时预测fdm打印ABS的杨氏模量(E)和极限抗拉强度(UTS)。从拉伸测试中编译了78个实验数据点的数据集,其中喷嘴温度(220-250°C)、光栅角度(0-90°)、层厚度(0.1-0.3 mm)、打印速度(20-50 mm/s)和壁数(2-6)作为输入。训练了8个多输出回归量,并使用基于深度确定性策略梯度(DDPG)的深度强化学习对其超参数进行了持续调整,并对网格搜索、随机搜索和基于tpe的贝叶斯优化进行了基准测试。DDPG持续改善泛化;最佳独立模型XGBoost的检验R2为87.908%,MAE为0.269,RMSE为0.336。然后通过简单平均、加权平均和堆叠来研究集成学习。简单平均CatBoost-XGBoost集成的测试性能最高,R2为88.735%,MAE为0.252,RMSE为0.322。两两Wilcoxon sign -rank检验证实了该集合优于主要替代方案的统计优势。Shapley Additive Explanation SHAP分析提供了可解释性,栅格角是E的主要驱动因素,墙数和栅格角是UTS的主要驱动因素,而打印速度的影响最弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
275
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mechanics endash; A/Solids continues to publish articles in English in all areas of Solid Mechanics from the physical and mathematical basis to materials engineering, technological applications and methods of modern computational mechanics, both pure and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书