Collaborative online international learning: Sustainability mindset in accounting education

Q1 Social Sciences
Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2026.101005
Nadia Gulko , Susanna Levina Middelberg , Liz Warren , Elizabeth A. Gordon
{"title":"Collaborative online international learning: Sustainability mindset in accounting education","authors":"Nadia Gulko ,&nbsp;Susanna Levina Middelberg ,&nbsp;Liz Warren ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Gordon","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2026.101005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper evaluates a collaborative online international learning (COIL) project co-designed with sustainability practitioners to promote a sustainable development mindset among accounting students. The project participants were 141 students from six countries, the UK, Ghana, South Africa, the USA, Germany, and India. They completed an eight-week extracurricular COIL course, involving workshops focused on the what, why, and how of sustainability concepts. The findings, based on self-reported perceptions and reflections, indicate that by engaging with COIL, students developed a greater awareness of environmental, social, and governance principles. The project both enhanced their understanding of the role of accounting in sustainability, and improved their career readiness. They also reported developing a stronger personal responsibility toward maintaining sustainability and valued the exposure to diverse global perspectives. The paper advances accounting education and COIL literature by theorizing the industry, educator, and student triad as a site of epistemic negotiation, in which disciplinary knowledge, professional practice, and lived experience intersect to reshape how sustainability is understood within accounting education. While COILs are increasingly positioned to resolve internationalization and employability agendas, their capacity to support deeper epistemic and normative shifts, particularly in accounting education, remains insufficiently theorized or empirically examined. Conceptually and empirically, the paper contributes further by offering one of the most internationally expansive COIL projects in accounting education to date, evidencing the benefits of co-creation with industry to engage students in extracurricular learning. We conclude that thoughtfully designed COIL initiatives can prepare future accountants for the ethical, global, and sustainability-oriented challenges of the profession.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575126000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper evaluates a collaborative online international learning (COIL) project co-designed with sustainability practitioners to promote a sustainable development mindset among accounting students. The project participants were 141 students from six countries, the UK, Ghana, South Africa, the USA, Germany, and India. They completed an eight-week extracurricular COIL course, involving workshops focused on the what, why, and how of sustainability concepts. The findings, based on self-reported perceptions and reflections, indicate that by engaging with COIL, students developed a greater awareness of environmental, social, and governance principles. The project both enhanced their understanding of the role of accounting in sustainability, and improved their career readiness. They also reported developing a stronger personal responsibility toward maintaining sustainability and valued the exposure to diverse global perspectives. The paper advances accounting education and COIL literature by theorizing the industry, educator, and student triad as a site of epistemic negotiation, in which disciplinary knowledge, professional practice, and lived experience intersect to reshape how sustainability is understood within accounting education. While COILs are increasingly positioned to resolve internationalization and employability agendas, their capacity to support deeper epistemic and normative shifts, particularly in accounting education, remains insufficiently theorized or empirically examined. Conceptually and empirically, the paper contributes further by offering one of the most internationally expansive COIL projects in accounting education to date, evidencing the benefits of co-creation with industry to engage students in extracurricular learning. We conclude that thoughtfully designed COIL initiatives can prepare future accountants for the ethical, global, and sustainability-oriented challenges of the profession.
协同在线国际学习:会计教育中的可持续性思维
本文评估了与可持续发展从业者共同设计的协作在线国际学习(COIL)项目,以促进会计学生的可持续发展思维。该项目的参与者是来自英国、加纳、南非、美国、德国和印度六个国家的141名学生。他们完成了一个为期八周的课外COIL课程,其中包括关注可持续发展概念的内容、原因和方式的研讨会。基于自我报告的看法和反思的研究结果表明,通过参与COIL,学生们对环境、社会和治理原则有了更强的认识。该项目既加深了他们对会计在可持续发展中的作用的理解,也改善了他们的职业准备。他们还报告说,他们对维持可持续发展有了更强的个人责任,并重视接触不同的全球视角。本文通过将行业、教育者和学生三位一体理论化作为认知谈判的场所,推进会计教育和COIL文献,其中学科知识、专业实践和生活经验相交,重塑会计教育中如何理解可持续性。虽然线圈越来越多地定位于解决国际化和就业能力议程,但它们支持更深层次的认识和规范转变的能力,特别是在会计教育方面,仍然缺乏充分的理论或经验检验。从概念上和经验上,本文通过提供迄今为止会计教育中最具国际扩展性的COIL项目之一,进一步做出了贡献,证明了与行业共同创造以吸引学生参与课外学习的好处。我们的结论是,精心设计的COIL计划可以为未来的会计师做好准备,以应对职业道德、全球和可持续发展为导向的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书