Nadia Gulko , Susanna Levina Middelberg , Liz Warren , Elizabeth A. Gordon
{"title":"Collaborative online international learning: Sustainability mindset in accounting education","authors":"Nadia Gulko , Susanna Levina Middelberg , Liz Warren , Elizabeth A. Gordon","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2026.101005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper evaluates a collaborative online international learning (COIL) project co-designed with sustainability practitioners to promote a sustainable development mindset among accounting students. The project participants were 141 students from six countries, the UK, Ghana, South Africa, the USA, Germany, and India. They completed an eight-week extracurricular COIL course, involving workshops focused on the what, why, and how of sustainability concepts. The findings, based on self-reported perceptions and reflections, indicate that by engaging with COIL, students developed a greater awareness of environmental, social, and governance principles. The project both enhanced their understanding of the role of accounting in sustainability, and improved their career readiness. They also reported developing a stronger personal responsibility toward maintaining sustainability and valued the exposure to diverse global perspectives. The paper advances accounting education and COIL literature by theorizing the industry, educator, and student triad as a site of epistemic negotiation, in which disciplinary knowledge, professional practice, and lived experience intersect to reshape how sustainability is understood within accounting education. While COILs are increasingly positioned to resolve internationalization and employability agendas, their capacity to support deeper epistemic and normative shifts, particularly in accounting education, remains insufficiently theorized or empirically examined. Conceptually and empirically, the paper contributes further by offering one of the most internationally expansive COIL projects in accounting education to date, evidencing the benefits of co-creation with industry to engage students in extracurricular learning. We conclude that thoughtfully designed COIL initiatives can prepare future accountants for the ethical, global, and sustainability-oriented challenges of the profession.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575126000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper evaluates a collaborative online international learning (COIL) project co-designed with sustainability practitioners to promote a sustainable development mindset among accounting students. The project participants were 141 students from six countries, the UK, Ghana, South Africa, the USA, Germany, and India. They completed an eight-week extracurricular COIL course, involving workshops focused on the what, why, and how of sustainability concepts. The findings, based on self-reported perceptions and reflections, indicate that by engaging with COIL, students developed a greater awareness of environmental, social, and governance principles. The project both enhanced their understanding of the role of accounting in sustainability, and improved their career readiness. They also reported developing a stronger personal responsibility toward maintaining sustainability and valued the exposure to diverse global perspectives. The paper advances accounting education and COIL literature by theorizing the industry, educator, and student triad as a site of epistemic negotiation, in which disciplinary knowledge, professional practice, and lived experience intersect to reshape how sustainability is understood within accounting education. While COILs are increasingly positioned to resolve internationalization and employability agendas, their capacity to support deeper epistemic and normative shifts, particularly in accounting education, remains insufficiently theorized or empirically examined. Conceptually and empirically, the paper contributes further by offering one of the most internationally expansive COIL projects in accounting education to date, evidencing the benefits of co-creation with industry to engage students in extracurricular learning. We conclude that thoughtfully designed COIL initiatives can prepare future accountants for the ethical, global, and sustainability-oriented challenges of the profession.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.