Cascade hydropower retrofitting for pumped storage in high-penetration renewable energy systems: Techno-economic perspectives

IF 9.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2026.125386
Zhenni Wang , Qiaofeng Tan , Xin Wen , Huaying Su , Guohua Fang , Hao Wang
{"title":"Cascade hydropower retrofitting for pumped storage in high-penetration renewable energy systems: Techno-economic perspectives","authors":"Zhenni Wang ,&nbsp;Qiaofeng Tan ,&nbsp;Xin Wen ,&nbsp;Huaying Su ,&nbsp;Guohua Fang ,&nbsp;Hao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2026.125386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Retrofitting hydropower plants with pumping stations (HPSH-P), reversible units (HPSH-PT), or new reservoirs (PSH) is critical for boosting grid flexibility and variable renewable energy (VRE) integration. However, comparative multi-scale operational characteristics and techno-economic trade-offs among these pathways remain underexplored. This study develops a scheduling model that captures multi-scale regulation for these retrofitting approaches, driven by a net-load-based time-of-use price curve. The performance of different pathways is further evaluated through techno-economic and sensitivity analyses, considering hydrological inflows, economic parameters, and round-trip efficiency. A Southwest China case study reveals that HPSH-P provides a cost-effective near-term solution for capital-constrained or low-capacity-factor plants. In contrast, HPSH-PT achieves a peak net present value of 7.0 billion CNY by effectively leveraging existing storage and expanded capacity at moderate investment. While PSH delivers superior technical performance, with an overall energy conversion efficiency of 79.8%, a VRE curtailment absorption rate of 9.9%, and an annual greenhouse gas reduction of 10.5 Mt CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, substantial capital costs for new reservoirs raise its break-even threshold. Notably, all schemes at their optimal capacities exhibit competitive levelized cost of energy (LCOE) below 200 CNY/MWh. These findings provide a systematic framework for transforming conventional hydropower into flexible, low-carbon energy storage assets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"262 ","pages":"Article 125386"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148126002119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrofitting hydropower plants with pumping stations (HPSH-P), reversible units (HPSH-PT), or new reservoirs (PSH) is critical for boosting grid flexibility and variable renewable energy (VRE) integration. However, comparative multi-scale operational characteristics and techno-economic trade-offs among these pathways remain underexplored. This study develops a scheduling model that captures multi-scale regulation for these retrofitting approaches, driven by a net-load-based time-of-use price curve. The performance of different pathways is further evaluated through techno-economic and sensitivity analyses, considering hydrological inflows, economic parameters, and round-trip efficiency. A Southwest China case study reveals that HPSH-P provides a cost-effective near-term solution for capital-constrained or low-capacity-factor plants. In contrast, HPSH-PT achieves a peak net present value of 7.0 billion CNY by effectively leveraging existing storage and expanded capacity at moderate investment. While PSH delivers superior technical performance, with an overall energy conversion efficiency of 79.8%, a VRE curtailment absorption rate of 9.9%, and an annual greenhouse gas reduction of 10.5 Mt CO2-eq, substantial capital costs for new reservoirs raise its break-even threshold. Notably, all schemes at their optimal capacities exhibit competitive levelized cost of energy (LCOE) below 200 CNY/MWh. These findings provide a systematic framework for transforming conventional hydropower into flexible, low-carbon energy storage assets.
高渗透可再生能源系统中抽水蓄能梯级水电改造:技术经济视角
用泵站(HPSH-P)、可逆机组(HPSH-PT)或新水库(PSH)改造水电站对于提高电网灵活性和可变可再生能源(VRE)的整合至关重要。然而,这些途径之间的比较多尺度操作特征和技术经济权衡仍未得到充分探讨。本研究开发了一个调度模型,该模型在基于净负荷的使用时间价格曲线的驱动下,捕捉了这些改造方法的多尺度调节。考虑到水文流入、经济参数和往返效率,通过技术经济和敏感性分析进一步评估了不同路径的性能。中国西南地区的一个案例研究表明,HPSH-P为资金紧张或低产能要素的工厂提供了一个具有成本效益的短期解决方案。相比之下,HPSH-PT在适度投资的情况下,通过有效利用现有存储和扩容容量,实现了70亿元的峰值净现值。虽然PSH具有卓越的技术性能,整体能源转换效率为79.8%,VRE弃风吸收率为9.9%,每年温室气体减排1050万吨二氧化碳当量,但新水库的大量资本成本提高了其盈亏平衡门槛。值得注意的是,所有方案在其最优容量下均表现出低于200元/兆瓦时的竞争性平准化能源成本(LCOE)。这些发现为将常规水电转变为灵活的低碳能源储存资产提供了一个系统框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书