Consolidation of a 1D isentropic analytical model for predicting particle velocity in cold spray

IF 8.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Materials & Design Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115630
Vojtech Lukes , Paloma Sirvent , Luis Alonso , Miguel Ángel Garrido-Maneiro , Pedro Poza
{"title":"Consolidation of a 1D isentropic analytical model for predicting particle velocity in cold spray","authors":"Vojtech Lukes ,&nbsp;Paloma Sirvent ,&nbsp;Luis Alonso ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Garrido-Maneiro ,&nbsp;Pedro Poza","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A robust validation of the one-dimensional isentropic model for predicting particle velocities in the cold spray process was carried out using a substantially larger and diverse experimental dataset to enable its safe application for data generation. We conducted high-speed laser imaging measurements over three stagnation pressures and four gas temperatures using aluminum and copper powders. To further assess the model’s accuracy, three Al particle-size distributions were also evaluated. Velocity data from the plume centerline matched model assumptions. The model reproduced key trends—velocity increases with temperature and pressure, and particle-size effects—with mean absolute deviations of 5.37% for Al and 5.26% for Cu. Although the overall trend was consistent, deviations up to 12–17% were observed in just two Al cases. In the case of Cu, all predictions presented deviations lower than 7% due to its higher sphericity, matching better with the model assumptions. While coarse-particle predictions were highly accurate, fine fractions were slightly overestimated, likely due to turbulence and nozzle shock waves not captured in the model. These results confirm that, with its extended validation, the model is a reliable, fast, and cost-effective alternative to Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations (CFD) for early-stage cold spray design and data generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":383,"journal":{"name":"Materials & Design","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 115630"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials & Design","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127526002005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A robust validation of the one-dimensional isentropic model for predicting particle velocities in the cold spray process was carried out using a substantially larger and diverse experimental dataset to enable its safe application for data generation. We conducted high-speed laser imaging measurements over three stagnation pressures and four gas temperatures using aluminum and copper powders. To further assess the model’s accuracy, three Al particle-size distributions were also evaluated. Velocity data from the plume centerline matched model assumptions. The model reproduced key trends—velocity increases with temperature and pressure, and particle-size effects—with mean absolute deviations of 5.37% for Al and 5.26% for Cu. Although the overall trend was consistent, deviations up to 12–17% were observed in just two Al cases. In the case of Cu, all predictions presented deviations lower than 7% due to its higher sphericity, matching better with the model assumptions. While coarse-particle predictions were highly accurate, fine fractions were slightly overestimated, likely due to turbulence and nozzle shock waves not captured in the model. These results confirm that, with its extended validation, the model is a reliable, fast, and cost-effective alternative to Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations (CFD) for early-stage cold spray design and data generation.

Abstract Image

冷喷雾中粒子速度预测的一维等熵分析模型的巩固
利用一个更大、更多样化的实验数据集,对预测冷喷雾过程中粒子速度的一维等熵模型进行了稳健验证,以确保其安全应用于数据生成。我们使用铝和铜粉末在三种停滞压力和四种气体温度下进行了高速激光成像测量。为了进一步评估模型的准确性,还评估了三种Al粒度分布。羽流中心线的速度数据与模型假设相符。该模型再现了关键趋势——速度随温度和压力的增加以及粒径效应——Al和Cu的平均绝对偏差分别为5.37%和5.26%。尽管总体趋势是一致的,但仅在两例人工智能病例中观察到高达12-17%的偏差。在铜的情况下,由于其较高的球形度,所有预测偏差均低于7%,与模型假设相匹配。虽然粗颗粒的预测非常准确,但细颗粒的估计略高,可能是由于湍流和喷嘴冲击波没有在模型中捕获。这些结果证实,经过扩展验证,该模型是一种可靠、快速、经济的替代计算流体动力学模拟(CFD),用于早期冷喷涂设计和数据生成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials & Design
Materials & Design Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1028
审稿时长
85 days
期刊介绍: Materials and Design is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes original research reports, review articles, and express communications. The journal focuses on studying the structure and properties of inorganic and organic materials, advancements in synthesis, processing, characterization, and testing, the design of materials and engineering systems, and their applications in technology. It aims to bring together various aspects of materials science, engineering, physics, and chemistry. The journal explores themes ranging from materials to design and aims to reveal the connections between natural and artificial materials, as well as experiment and modeling. Manuscripts submitted to Materials and Design should contain elements of discovery and surprise, as they often contribute new insights into the architecture and function of matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书