Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb , Reza Hassanli , Xing Ma , Milad Bazli , Allan Manalo , Thong M. Pham
{"title":"Influence of connection type on the effectiveness of CFRP wraps in seismic repair of precast GFRP-reinforced concrete columns","authors":"Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb , Reza Hassanli , Xing Ma , Milad Bazli , Allan Manalo , Thong M. Pham","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for accelerated construction and durable, low-maintenance structures has increased interest in precast concrete systems reinforced with glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP). To support wider adoption, various connection systems have been developed to meet project requirements. Under seismic loading, damage is typically limited to the concrete, with severity depending on the connection type. Despite this, these structures generally exhibit limited residual drift and remain repairable after strong earthquakes. However, their post-repair behaviour remains insufficiently understood, limiting confidence in the long-term safety and resilience of repaired structures. To address this gap, this study investigates the structural performance of repaired precast column-to-footing connections under seismic loading and compares it with that of the original specimens. The connections include a corrugated duct connection (GCDC), a pocket connection with a non-contact lap splice filled with engineered cementitious composite (ECC), and bolted connections with stainless steel bolts of varying sizes. The specimens were repaired using patch mortar and confined with two layers of carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) wraps at the connection region. The results showed that the repair method was effective in nearly restoring the lateral capacity of bolted connections, while GCDC exceeded the original by 32 % and the pocket connection was 9 % lower. In addition, the drift capacity of the repaired systems, defined as the drift at the point corresponding to the peak load, outperformed the originals. The GCDC reached 10 % drift versus 3.2 % originally, the pocket connection 8 % versus 4 %, and bolted connections up to 8 %, compared to 5 % and 3.2 % for the original connections with larger and smaller bolts, respectively. The failure mode of all the repaired systems was improved, with the failure zone shifting away from the repaired region. This resulted in a gradual flexural failure, particularly mitigating the sudden failure observed in the original bolted connections. Finally, the repaired specimens were able to dissipate 1.96–2.38 times more energy than the originals, although the initial stiffness was only partially restored to 83–92 % of the original. Overall, the proposed repair method restores and improves the seismic performance of precast GFRP-RC structures with different connections, providing a reliable approach for post-earthquake repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122303"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626002166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The growing demand for accelerated construction and durable, low-maintenance structures has increased interest in precast concrete systems reinforced with glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP). To support wider adoption, various connection systems have been developed to meet project requirements. Under seismic loading, damage is typically limited to the concrete, with severity depending on the connection type. Despite this, these structures generally exhibit limited residual drift and remain repairable after strong earthquakes. However, their post-repair behaviour remains insufficiently understood, limiting confidence in the long-term safety and resilience of repaired structures. To address this gap, this study investigates the structural performance of repaired precast column-to-footing connections under seismic loading and compares it with that of the original specimens. The connections include a corrugated duct connection (GCDC), a pocket connection with a non-contact lap splice filled with engineered cementitious composite (ECC), and bolted connections with stainless steel bolts of varying sizes. The specimens were repaired using patch mortar and confined with two layers of carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) wraps at the connection region. The results showed that the repair method was effective in nearly restoring the lateral capacity of bolted connections, while GCDC exceeded the original by 32 % and the pocket connection was 9 % lower. In addition, the drift capacity of the repaired systems, defined as the drift at the point corresponding to the peak load, outperformed the originals. The GCDC reached 10 % drift versus 3.2 % originally, the pocket connection 8 % versus 4 %, and bolted connections up to 8 %, compared to 5 % and 3.2 % for the original connections with larger and smaller bolts, respectively. The failure mode of all the repaired systems was improved, with the failure zone shifting away from the repaired region. This resulted in a gradual flexural failure, particularly mitigating the sudden failure observed in the original bolted connections. Finally, the repaired specimens were able to dissipate 1.96–2.38 times more energy than the originals, although the initial stiffness was only partially restored to 83–92 % of the original. Overall, the proposed repair method restores and improves the seismic performance of precast GFRP-RC structures with different connections, providing a reliable approach for post-earthquake repair.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.