Improved stiffness and strength requirements for point lateral bracing in beams

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122268
Kee Dong Kim , Jeonghwa Lee , Kyoung Yong Park , Young-Goo Choi
{"title":"Improved stiffness and strength requirements for point lateral bracing in beams","authors":"Kee Dong Kim ,&nbsp;Jeonghwa Lee ,&nbsp;Kyoung Yong Park ,&nbsp;Young-Goo Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Point lateral braces are essential for economical steel beam design by preventing out-of-plane deformations during construction. While previous studies have focused mainly on a single midspan brace, the behavior of beams with multiple braces under lateral–torsional buckling remains unclear. This study develops a unified framework for assessing the stiffness and strength requirements for beams with multiple braces. A modified stiffness coefficient, <em>N</em><sub><em>i</em></sub>, is proposed to more accurately define ideal brace stiffness varying brace numbers, load positions, and moment gradients, leading to a generalized stiffness requirement applicable to both single and multiple braces. The results indicate that, contrary to AISC provisions—which tend to overdesign as brace numbers increases—additional braces reduce both the required stiffness and bracing force, enabling more efficient designs. The buckling load equivalence model (BEM), originally formulated for columns, is adapted for beam bracing and, when combined with initial imperfections and threshold deflections, yields conservative and reliable predictions regardless of brace quantity. The proposed method offers a more rational approach to brace design compared with current AISC criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122268"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626001811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Point lateral braces are essential for economical steel beam design by preventing out-of-plane deformations during construction. While previous studies have focused mainly on a single midspan brace, the behavior of beams with multiple braces under lateral–torsional buckling remains unclear. This study develops a unified framework for assessing the stiffness and strength requirements for beams with multiple braces. A modified stiffness coefficient, Ni, is proposed to more accurately define ideal brace stiffness varying brace numbers, load positions, and moment gradients, leading to a generalized stiffness requirement applicable to both single and multiple braces. The results indicate that, contrary to AISC provisions—which tend to overdesign as brace numbers increases—additional braces reduce both the required stiffness and bracing force, enabling more efficient designs. The buckling load equivalence model (BEM), originally formulated for columns, is adapted for beam bracing and, when combined with initial imperfections and threshold deflections, yields conservative and reliable predictions regardless of brace quantity. The proposed method offers a more rational approach to brace design compared with current AISC criteria.
改进了梁中点侧支撑的刚度和强度要求
点侧支撑是经济型钢梁设计的重要组成部分,可以防止施工过程中的面外变形。虽然以前的研究主要集中在单个跨中支撑上,但具有多个支撑的梁在侧向扭转屈曲下的行为仍然不清楚。本研究开发了一个统一的框架,用于评估具有多个支撑的梁的刚度和强度要求。提出了一个修正的刚度系数Ni,以更准确地定义理想的支撑刚度随支撑数、载荷位置和力矩梯度的变化,从而得出适用于单个和多个支撑的广义刚度要求。结果表明,与AISC规定相反——随着支撑数量的增加,往往会过度设计——额外的支撑降低了所需的刚度和支撑力,从而实现了更有效的设计。最初为柱制定的屈曲荷载等效模型(BEM)适用于梁支撑,当与初始缺陷和阈值挠度相结合时,无论支撑数量如何,都会产生保守而可靠的预测。与现有的AISC准则相比,该方法为支撑设计提供了更为合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书