Haobo Liang , Yunfeng Zou , Chenzhi Cai , Xiangrong Guo , Xuhui He
{"title":"Effects of wind barriers on the running safety of trains on bridges under different turbulence intensities","authors":"Haobo Liang , Yunfeng Zou , Chenzhi Cai , Xiangrong Guo , Xuhui He","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wind barriers (WBs) serve as a practical approach to enhance the operational safety of trains running on bridges exposed to strong crosswinds. However, the wind environment at bridge sites located in complex mountainous regions often exhibits pronounced high turbulence characteristics. This study investigates the actual protective performance of WBs in such highly turbulent environments, focusing on their aerodynamic shielding effects under varying turbulence intensities (<em>I</em><sub>u</sub>). Wind tunnel tests were conducted to examine the aerodynamic characteristics of the train-bridge (TB) system under different wind conditions, with <em>I</em><sub>u</sub> ranging from 4.88% to 13.47%. Based on the experimental data, coupled wind-train-bridge (WTB) dynamic response analyses were conducted to quantitatively assess how different <em>I</em><sub>u</sub> influence the operational safety of trains. The results demonstrate that the unsteady aerodynamic loads induced by high <em>I</em><sub>u</sub> adversely affect train operational safety. Installing WBs effectively mitigates these detrimental effects. However, their protective performance is significantly influenced by <em>I</em><sub>u</sub>, and the safety indices deteriorate under highly turbulent conditions. This study emphasizes the importance of accounting for the actual turbulence characteristics of the wind field in WB design. The findings offer theoretical guidance for the wind-resistance optimization of long-span railway bridges in mountainous regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122307"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626002208","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wind barriers (WBs) serve as a practical approach to enhance the operational safety of trains running on bridges exposed to strong crosswinds. However, the wind environment at bridge sites located in complex mountainous regions often exhibits pronounced high turbulence characteristics. This study investigates the actual protective performance of WBs in such highly turbulent environments, focusing on their aerodynamic shielding effects under varying turbulence intensities (Iu). Wind tunnel tests were conducted to examine the aerodynamic characteristics of the train-bridge (TB) system under different wind conditions, with Iu ranging from 4.88% to 13.47%. Based on the experimental data, coupled wind-train-bridge (WTB) dynamic response analyses were conducted to quantitatively assess how different Iu influence the operational safety of trains. The results demonstrate that the unsteady aerodynamic loads induced by high Iu adversely affect train operational safety. Installing WBs effectively mitigates these detrimental effects. However, their protective performance is significantly influenced by Iu, and the safety indices deteriorate under highly turbulent conditions. This study emphasizes the importance of accounting for the actual turbulence characteristics of the wind field in WB design. The findings offer theoretical guidance for the wind-resistance optimization of long-span railway bridges in mountainous regions.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.