Mind the Gap: An Integrative Review of the Causes of the Gender Pay Gap

IF 9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Beth A. Livingston, Sujin Jeong, Felice B. Klein, Anushka Chakroborty
{"title":"Mind the Gap: An Integrative Review of the Causes of the Gender Pay Gap","authors":"Beth A. Livingston,&nbsp;Sujin Jeong,&nbsp;Felice B. Klein,&nbsp;Anushka Chakroborty","doi":"10.1002/job.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The gender pay gap (GPG) is often discussed in policy, media, and across multiple academic literatures. Scholars of the GPG have focused significant attention on the causes and generated an extensive body of work revealing rich insights on why women tend to make less than men. But this literature is fragmented, and the sheer number of causes found in previous studies limits our ability to recognize the main reasons for the gap and move the literature forward toward solutions. We review the literature across fields, including economics, sociology, and applied psychology/management, and offer a unifying framework that identifies the main reasons for the GPG. Specifically, our framework organizes the GPG causes, and the theories used to explain such causes into four main perspectives: capital accumulation, bias and discrimination, sorting, and nature- and nurture-based differences. Our framework also explains how these perspectives are affected by the national and organizational contexts in which they are embedded. We then discuss gaps in the current literature exposed by our model that can be filled via novel theoretical, cross-disciplinary research, and by adopting different methodological and practical approaches. Overall, our review distills a large and diffuse literature into a clear framework to direct researchers toward theoretical insights and novel research questions that can get us closer to pay equality across genders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"47 2","pages":"261-287"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gender pay gap (GPG) is often discussed in policy, media, and across multiple academic literatures. Scholars of the GPG have focused significant attention on the causes and generated an extensive body of work revealing rich insights on why women tend to make less than men. But this literature is fragmented, and the sheer number of causes found in previous studies limits our ability to recognize the main reasons for the gap and move the literature forward toward solutions. We review the literature across fields, including economics, sociology, and applied psychology/management, and offer a unifying framework that identifies the main reasons for the GPG. Specifically, our framework organizes the GPG causes, and the theories used to explain such causes into four main perspectives: capital accumulation, bias and discrimination, sorting, and nature- and nurture-based differences. Our framework also explains how these perspectives are affected by the national and organizational contexts in which they are embedded. We then discuss gaps in the current literature exposed by our model that can be filled via novel theoretical, cross-disciplinary research, and by adopting different methodological and practical approaches. Overall, our review distills a large and diffuse literature into a clear framework to direct researchers toward theoretical insights and novel research questions that can get us closer to pay equality across genders.

Abstract Image

关注差距:对性别薪酬差距原因的综合回顾
性别薪酬差距(GPG)经常在政策、媒体和多个学术文献中被讨论。GPG的学者们把大量的注意力集中在原因上,并产生了大量的工作,揭示了为什么女性往往比男性赚得少的丰富见解。但是这些文献是碎片化的,在之前的研究中发现的原因数量之多,限制了我们认识到这种差距的主要原因,并将文献推向解决方案的能力。我们回顾了各个领域的文献,包括经济学、社会学和应用心理学/管理学,并提供了一个统一的框架来确定GPG的主要原因。具体来说,我们的框架将GPG的原因和用于解释这些原因的理论分为四个主要视角:资本积累、偏见和歧视、分类和基于自然和后天的差异。我们的框架还解释了这些观点是如何受到它们所处的国家和组织背景的影响的。然后,我们讨论了我们的模型所揭示的当前文献中的空白,这些空白可以通过新的理论、跨学科研究以及采用不同的方法和实践方法来填补。总的来说,我们的综述将大量分散的文献提炼成一个清晰的框架,以指导研究人员进行理论见解和新颖的研究问题,从而使我们更接近性别薪酬平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书