Taking the pulse of the world's raptors — A systematic quantitative review of wildlife rehabilitation centre admissions

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111746
Connor T. Panter , Heather E. Bullock , Mark Brown , Devvratsinh Mori , Lindy J. Thompson
{"title":"Taking the pulse of the world's raptors — A systematic quantitative review of wildlife rehabilitation centre admissions","authors":"Connor T. Panter ,&nbsp;Heather E. Bullock ,&nbsp;Mark Brown ,&nbsp;Devvratsinh Mori ,&nbsp;Lindy J. Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human activities, including urban expansion, persecution, and energy and transportation infrastructure, contribute to global wildlife declines. Understanding wildlife mortality and morbidity is crucial for conservation, especially for bioindicator species such as raptors. However, causes of raptor mortality and morbidity remain poorly understood on a global scale. Analysing 147,422 wildlife rehabilitation centre (WRC) admissions from 38 sources containing admissions records from 1989 to 2023, we conducted a systematic quantitative review of raptor admission causes for 148 species globally. Raptor admissions increased over time, with owls (34.3%), falcons (23.7%), and buteo hawks (22%) being the most frequently admitted taxonomic groups. Most admissions were due to unknown causes (40.7%), followed by human-related (39.1%) and natural causes (20.2%). The leading human-related causes were unspecified trauma (18.5%), vehicle collisions (14.1%), and electrocution or gas flare incidents (7.4%). Factors including taxonomic group, body mass, feeding guild, threat status, country GDP per capita, and continent significantly predicted admission type (human vs. natural). Mortality probabilities were 60% for human-related admissions and 19% for natural causes. Wind turbine collisions and electrocution or gas flares resulted in the highest mortality rates (98% and 92%, respectively), while eagles and New World Vultures faced the highest overall mortality probabilities following admission (56% and 55%, respectively). Our findings emphasise the need for comprehensive conservation strategies that address human-induced threats, particularly as the global green energy transition advances. Mitigating risks associated with future infrastructure development, including onshore wind turbines, powerlines, and roadways, is crucial for raptor conservation in an anthropogenic world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"316 ","pages":"Article 111746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320726000546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human activities, including urban expansion, persecution, and energy and transportation infrastructure, contribute to global wildlife declines. Understanding wildlife mortality and morbidity is crucial for conservation, especially for bioindicator species such as raptors. However, causes of raptor mortality and morbidity remain poorly understood on a global scale. Analysing 147,422 wildlife rehabilitation centre (WRC) admissions from 38 sources containing admissions records from 1989 to 2023, we conducted a systematic quantitative review of raptor admission causes for 148 species globally. Raptor admissions increased over time, with owls (34.3%), falcons (23.7%), and buteo hawks (22%) being the most frequently admitted taxonomic groups. Most admissions were due to unknown causes (40.7%), followed by human-related (39.1%) and natural causes (20.2%). The leading human-related causes were unspecified trauma (18.5%), vehicle collisions (14.1%), and electrocution or gas flare incidents (7.4%). Factors including taxonomic group, body mass, feeding guild, threat status, country GDP per capita, and continent significantly predicted admission type (human vs. natural). Mortality probabilities were 60% for human-related admissions and 19% for natural causes. Wind turbine collisions and electrocution or gas flares resulted in the highest mortality rates (98% and 92%, respectively), while eagles and New World Vultures faced the highest overall mortality probabilities following admission (56% and 55%, respectively). Our findings emphasise the need for comprehensive conservation strategies that address human-induced threats, particularly as the global green energy transition advances. Mitigating risks associated with future infrastructure development, including onshore wind turbines, powerlines, and roadways, is crucial for raptor conservation in an anthropogenic world.
把握世界猛禽的脉搏——野生动物康复中心招生的系统定量审查
包括城市扩张、迫害、能源和交通基础设施在内的人类活动导致了全球野生动物的减少。了解野生动物的死亡率和发病率对保护至关重要,特别是对猛禽等生物指标物种。然而,猛禽死亡率和发病率的原因在全球范围内仍然知之甚少。分析了1989年至2023年38个野生动物康复中心(WRC) 147,422个接收记录,对全球148种猛禽的接收原因进行了系统的定量评价。随着时间的推移,猛禽的入学率也在增加,猫头鹰(34.3%)、猎鹰(23.7%)和buteo hawks(22%)是最常被录取的分类群体。入院原因不明的占40.7%,其次是人为原因(39.1%)和自然原因(20.2%)。与人类有关的主要原因是未指明的创伤(18.5%),车辆碰撞(14.1%)和触电或瓦斯耀斑事件(7.4%)。分类类群、体重、饲养公会、威胁状况、国家人均GDP和大陆等因素对入场类型(人为vs.自然)有显著预测作用。人为原因入院的死亡率为60%,自然原因入院的死亡率为19%。风力涡轮机碰撞和触电或气体耀斑导致最高的死亡率(分别为98%和92%),而老鹰和新世界秃鹫在入院后面临最高的总体死亡率(分别为56%和55%)。我们的研究结果强调,需要制定全面的保护战略,以应对人类造成的威胁,尤其是在全球绿色能源转型取得进展的情况下。减轻未来基础设施发展的相关风险,包括陆上风力涡轮机、电力线和道路,对于在人类活动的世界中保护猛禽至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书