Can judicial independence restrain corporate fraud? Empirical evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Tengjiao He , Yijun Yu , Yufei Zhang , Li Wang
{"title":"Can judicial independence restrain corporate fraud? Empirical evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms","authors":"Tengjiao He ,&nbsp;Yijun Yu ,&nbsp;Yufei Zhang ,&nbsp;Li Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.irle.2026.106324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether judicial independence can restrain corporate fraud. We take a unique personnel and financial reform in China’s local courts, which shifts the power of financial management and local judge appointment from municipal governments to the provincial level, as a natural experiment. This reform significantly strengthens the judicial independence of the local courts. Collecting data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2021 for empirical analysis, we find that this staggered judicial independence reform significantly restrains corporate fraud. Our mechanism analysis suggests that the judicial independence reform restrains corporate fraud by breaking local judicial protectionism, improving corporate governance, and relaxing financial constraints. This effect is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises, firms with political connections, and firms in poor legal environments. Overall, our research provides new evidence on how judicial independence restrains firm fraud, which provides important policy implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47202,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law and Economics","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 106324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818826000049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates whether judicial independence can restrain corporate fraud. We take a unique personnel and financial reform in China’s local courts, which shifts the power of financial management and local judge appointment from municipal governments to the provincial level, as a natural experiment. This reform significantly strengthens the judicial independence of the local courts. Collecting data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2021 for empirical analysis, we find that this staggered judicial independence reform significantly restrains corporate fraud. Our mechanism analysis suggests that the judicial independence reform restrains corporate fraud by breaking local judicial protectionism, improving corporate governance, and relaxing financial constraints. This effect is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises, firms with political connections, and firms in poor legal environments. Overall, our research provides new evidence on how judicial independence restrains firm fraud, which provides important policy implications.
司法独立能抑制公司欺诈吗?来自中国a股上市公司的经验证据
本研究探讨司法独立是否能抑制公司舞弊。我们对中国地方法院进行了独特的人事和财政改革,将财政管理权和地方法官任命权从市级政府转移到省级政府,这是一个自然的实验。这一改革大大加强了地方法院的司法独立性。通过对2011 - 2021年中国a股上市公司数据的实证分析,我们发现交错司法独立改革显著抑制了公司舞弊行为。我们的机制分析表明,司法独立改革通过打破地方司法保护主义、改善公司治理和放松金融约束来抑制公司欺诈。这种影响在国有企业、有政治关系的公司和法律环境不佳的公司中更为明显。总的来说,我们的研究为司法独立如何抑制公司欺诈提供了新的证据,这提供了重要的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The International Review of Law and Economics provides a forum for interdisciplinary research at the interface of law and economics. IRLE is international in scope and audience and particularly welcomes both theoretical and empirical papers on comparative law and economics, globalization and legal harmonization, and the endogenous emergence of legal institutions, in addition to more traditional legal topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书