{"title":"When scalarity meets cross-domain mapping: A corpus-based lexical-conceptual analysis of metaphorical hyperbole","authors":"Joanna Zhuoan Chen, Kathleen Ahrens","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2026.104120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metaphor and hyperbole are traditionally treated as distinct tropes, yet they frequently co-occur in discourse, raising theoretical questions about the nature of metaphorical hyperbole. Despite increasing scholarly interest, the structural relationship between metaphor and hyperbole, particularly how they interact within a single lexical unit, remains an open question. Addressing this gap, the present study develops a lexical–conceptual account of metaphorical hyperbole and examines its linguistic realization in a corpus of promotional hospitality discourse. Through systematic lexical analysis, we identify the frequency, source domains, and linguistic realizations of metaphorical hyperbole in authentic texts. We demonstrate that metaphorical hyperbole arises when the metaphorical mapping provides the basis for scalar modification. We further distinguish two subtypes of metaphorical hyperbole based on whether encyclopedic knowledge is required to interpret the mapping. By elucidating the structural properties and usage patterns of metaphorical hyperbole, the study broadens the typological scope of Conceptual Metaphor Theory and underscores the importance of examining composite tropes that operate simultaneously rather than in isolation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 104120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384126000148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Metaphor and hyperbole are traditionally treated as distinct tropes, yet they frequently co-occur in discourse, raising theoretical questions about the nature of metaphorical hyperbole. Despite increasing scholarly interest, the structural relationship between metaphor and hyperbole, particularly how they interact within a single lexical unit, remains an open question. Addressing this gap, the present study develops a lexical–conceptual account of metaphorical hyperbole and examines its linguistic realization in a corpus of promotional hospitality discourse. Through systematic lexical analysis, we identify the frequency, source domains, and linguistic realizations of metaphorical hyperbole in authentic texts. We demonstrate that metaphorical hyperbole arises when the metaphorical mapping provides the basis for scalar modification. We further distinguish two subtypes of metaphorical hyperbole based on whether encyclopedic knowledge is required to interpret the mapping. By elucidating the structural properties and usage patterns of metaphorical hyperbole, the study broadens the typological scope of Conceptual Metaphor Theory and underscores the importance of examining composite tropes that operate simultaneously rather than in isolation.
期刊介绍:
Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.