Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia

IF 7.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2026.104606
Nicola Willand , Bhavna Middha , Sarah Robertson , Ralph Horne , Lisa de Kleyn , Trivess Moore , Ananya Majumdar , Hector Padilla Gil
{"title":"Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia","authors":"Nicola Willand ,&nbsp;Bhavna Middha ,&nbsp;Sarah Robertson ,&nbsp;Ralph Horne ,&nbsp;Lisa de Kleyn ,&nbsp;Trivess Moore ,&nbsp;Ananya Majumdar ,&nbsp;Hector Padilla Gil","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low carbon dwelling improvements combine upgrades to thermal envelopes and appliances with renewable energy systems. Despite proven cost-effective options for emissions reductions and quality of life enhancements, widespread adoption remains elusive. Instead, such projects are often isolated, with uneven distribution across locations, housing contexts and socio-economic groups. Many literature and stakeholder-informed models of upscaling low carbon housing improvements are grounded in the logic that households can and will make optimising choices around long-term cost savings, and that markets of supply and demand for such home energy improvements are mature, functioning, and effective. In this paper, we demonstrate that, in reality, the achievement of low carbon home improvements is situational, social and contextual - shaped by the complexity of dwelling and householder characteristics and multiple market failures. Our study involved interviews with 161 Australian households to explore their past and planned home improvements. We focus on the socio-material dimensions of low carbon housing improvements and present an empirically-based model designed to more accurately reflect diverse societal capabilities. By combining elements of Social Practice Theories and the Capabilities Approach, we identified how social structures, norms and routines along with materials and shared understandings created and perpetuated inequalities in achieving energy-efficient, low carbon homes. Our framework suggests low carbon housing improvement policies and industry practices should address technical and affordability aspects while also considering the relational and emotional dimensions of home making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104606"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629626000770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low carbon dwelling improvements combine upgrades to thermal envelopes and appliances with renewable energy systems. Despite proven cost-effective options for emissions reductions and quality of life enhancements, widespread adoption remains elusive. Instead, such projects are often isolated, with uneven distribution across locations, housing contexts and socio-economic groups. Many literature and stakeholder-informed models of upscaling low carbon housing improvements are grounded in the logic that households can and will make optimising choices around long-term cost savings, and that markets of supply and demand for such home energy improvements are mature, functioning, and effective. In this paper, we demonstrate that, in reality, the achievement of low carbon home improvements is situational, social and contextual - shaped by the complexity of dwelling and householder characteristics and multiple market failures. Our study involved interviews with 161 Australian households to explore their past and planned home improvements. We focus on the socio-material dimensions of low carbon housing improvements and present an empirically-based model designed to more accurately reflect diverse societal capabilities. By combining elements of Social Practice Theories and the Capabilities Approach, we identified how social structures, norms and routines along with materials and shared understandings created and perpetuated inequalities in achieving energy-efficient, low carbon homes. Our framework suggests low carbon housing improvement policies and industry practices should address technical and affordability aspects while also considering the relational and emotional dimensions of home making.
发展以能力为基础的低碳转型框架:来自澳大利亚家装实践实证研究的见解
低碳住宅的改进结合了热封套和可再生能源系统电器的升级。尽管在减少排放和提高生活质量方面已被证明具有成本效益,但广泛采用仍然难以实现。相反,这些项目往往是孤立的,在地点、住房环境和社会经济群体之间分布不均。许多文献和利益相关者了解的提高低碳住房改善的模型都是基于这样的逻辑:家庭能够并且将围绕长期成本节约做出优化选择,并且这种家庭能源改善的供需市场是成熟的、有效的和有效的。在本文中,我们证明,在现实中,低碳家居改善的实现是情境化的、社会化的和背景化的——由住宅和住户特征的复杂性以及多重市场失灵所塑造。我们的研究包括对161个澳大利亚家庭的采访,以了解他们的过去和计划的家庭装修。我们关注低碳住房改善的社会物质维度,并提出了一个基于经验的模型,旨在更准确地反映不同的社会能力。通过结合社会实践理论和能力方法的元素,我们确定了社会结构、规范和惯例以及材料和共同理解如何在实现节能、低碳住宅方面创造和延续不平等。我们的框架建议,低碳住房改善政策和行业实践应解决技术和负担能力方面的问题,同时也考虑到家庭制造的关系和情感层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书