Nicola Willand , Bhavna Middha , Sarah Robertson , Ralph Horne , Lisa de Kleyn , Trivess Moore , Ananya Majumdar , Hector Padilla Gil
{"title":"Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia","authors":"Nicola Willand , Bhavna Middha , Sarah Robertson , Ralph Horne , Lisa de Kleyn , Trivess Moore , Ananya Majumdar , Hector Padilla Gil","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low carbon dwelling improvements combine upgrades to thermal envelopes and appliances with renewable energy systems. Despite proven cost-effective options for emissions reductions and quality of life enhancements, widespread adoption remains elusive. Instead, such projects are often isolated, with uneven distribution across locations, housing contexts and socio-economic groups. Many literature and stakeholder-informed models of upscaling low carbon housing improvements are grounded in the logic that households can and will make optimising choices around long-term cost savings, and that markets of supply and demand for such home energy improvements are mature, functioning, and effective. In this paper, we demonstrate that, in reality, the achievement of low carbon home improvements is situational, social and contextual - shaped by the complexity of dwelling and householder characteristics and multiple market failures. Our study involved interviews with 161 Australian households to explore their past and planned home improvements. We focus on the socio-material dimensions of low carbon housing improvements and present an empirically-based model designed to more accurately reflect diverse societal capabilities. By combining elements of Social Practice Theories and the Capabilities Approach, we identified how social structures, norms and routines along with materials and shared understandings created and perpetuated inequalities in achieving energy-efficient, low carbon homes. Our framework suggests low carbon housing improvement policies and industry practices should address technical and affordability aspects while also considering the relational and emotional dimensions of home making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104606"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629626000770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Low carbon dwelling improvements combine upgrades to thermal envelopes and appliances with renewable energy systems. Despite proven cost-effective options for emissions reductions and quality of life enhancements, widespread adoption remains elusive. Instead, such projects are often isolated, with uneven distribution across locations, housing contexts and socio-economic groups. Many literature and stakeholder-informed models of upscaling low carbon housing improvements are grounded in the logic that households can and will make optimising choices around long-term cost savings, and that markets of supply and demand for such home energy improvements are mature, functioning, and effective. In this paper, we demonstrate that, in reality, the achievement of low carbon home improvements is situational, social and contextual - shaped by the complexity of dwelling and householder characteristics and multiple market failures. Our study involved interviews with 161 Australian households to explore their past and planned home improvements. We focus on the socio-material dimensions of low carbon housing improvements and present an empirically-based model designed to more accurately reflect diverse societal capabilities. By combining elements of Social Practice Theories and the Capabilities Approach, we identified how social structures, norms and routines along with materials and shared understandings created and perpetuated inequalities in achieving energy-efficient, low carbon homes. Our framework suggests low carbon housing improvement policies and industry practices should address technical and affordability aspects while also considering the relational and emotional dimensions of home making.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.