Climate risk communication and farmers’ adaptive behaviour in the Indo-Gangetic Plains: Insights from the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework

IF 5.5 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nushrat Jahan , R.N. Padaria , Aiswarya S , L. Muralikrishnan , Subhashree Sahu , Md Yeasin , Ananta Vashisth , Dibyanshu Shekhar , Priti Priyadarshni , Bhaskar Ghosh , Sweety Mukherjee , Amandeep Ranjan , Kotha Shravani , Simran Pundir
{"title":"Climate risk communication and farmers’ adaptive behaviour in the Indo-Gangetic Plains: Insights from the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework","authors":"Nushrat Jahan ,&nbsp;R.N. Padaria ,&nbsp;Aiswarya S ,&nbsp;L. Muralikrishnan ,&nbsp;Subhashree Sahu ,&nbsp;Md Yeasin ,&nbsp;Ananta Vashisth ,&nbsp;Dibyanshu Shekhar ,&nbsp;Priti Priyadarshni ,&nbsp;Bhaskar Ghosh ,&nbsp;Sweety Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Amandeep Ranjan ,&nbsp;Kotha Shravani ,&nbsp;Simran Pundir","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2026.101141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) remain highly climate vulnerable, where farmers experience limited access to timely, trusted, and contextualized risk information necessary for adaptation. This study examines how exposure to risk communication, along with key socio-psychological determinants, shapes behavioural responses to climate change. Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework, six constructs were conceptualized and validated—Risk Communication, Social Participation, Institutional Awareness, Risk Perception, Negative Emotions, and Behavioural Change. A multistage sampling approach was applied across Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, engaging 240 farmers. PLS-SEM was used to develop indicators, evaluate construct validity, and test structural relationships. Among the significant predictors, Negative Emotions strongly impacted Behavioural Change (β = 0.961), while Institutional Awareness significantly influenced both Negative Emotions (β = 0.817) and Risk Perception (β = 0.711). Beyond model fit, the validated indicators generated through this study can support future assessment of climate risk communication effectiveness and serve as reference metrics for extension and sustainability research. Overall, the study offers a contextually grounded and empirically strengthened risk communication model that can inform more responsive and farmer-centric advisory strategies to enhance climate resilience in the IGP. It provides valuable insights for designing more effective, psychologically informed risk communication strategies to strengthen climate resilience among vulnerable farming communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101141"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972726000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) remain highly climate vulnerable, where farmers experience limited access to timely, trusted, and contextualized risk information necessary for adaptation. This study examines how exposure to risk communication, along with key socio-psychological determinants, shapes behavioural responses to climate change. Using the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework, six constructs were conceptualized and validated—Risk Communication, Social Participation, Institutional Awareness, Risk Perception, Negative Emotions, and Behavioural Change. A multistage sampling approach was applied across Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, engaging 240 farmers. PLS-SEM was used to develop indicators, evaluate construct validity, and test structural relationships. Among the significant predictors, Negative Emotions strongly impacted Behavioural Change (β = 0.961), while Institutional Awareness significantly influenced both Negative Emotions (β = 0.817) and Risk Perception (β = 0.711). Beyond model fit, the validated indicators generated through this study can support future assessment of climate risk communication effectiveness and serve as reference metrics for extension and sustainability research. Overall, the study offers a contextually grounded and empirically strengthened risk communication model that can inform more responsive and farmer-centric advisory strategies to enhance climate resilience in the IGP. It provides valuable insights for designing more effective, psychologically informed risk communication strategies to strengthen climate resilience among vulnerable farming communities.
印度恒河平原气候风险沟通和农民适应行为:来自刺激-生物-反应(S-O-R)框架的见解
印度河-恒河平原(IGP)仍然极易受到气候变化的影响,农民获得适应气候变化所需的及时、可信和有背景的风险信息的渠道有限。本研究考察了暴露于风险沟通以及关键的社会心理决定因素如何影响对气候变化的行为反应。采用刺激-机体-反应(S-O-R)框架,对风险沟通、社会参与、制度意识、风险感知、负面情绪和行为改变这六个构念进行了概念化和验证。在比哈尔邦和北方邦采用了多阶段抽样方法,涉及240名农民。PLS-SEM用于制定指标、评估结构效度和检验结构关系。负性情绪显著影响行为改变(β = 0.961),制度意识显著影响负性情绪(β = 0.817)和风险感知(β = 0.711)。除了模型拟合之外,通过本研究生成的经过验证的指标可以支持未来气候风险沟通有效性的评估,并可作为推广和可持续性研究的参考指标。总体而言,该研究提供了一个基于背景和经验的风险沟通模型,可以为更具响应性和以农民为中心的咨询战略提供信息,以增强IGP的气候适应能力。它为设计更有效、心理知情的风险沟通策略,以加强脆弱农业社区的气候适应能力提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书