When is an owl not an owl? An analysis of Attic tetradrachms circulating in the southern Levant in the late fifth and fourth centuries BCE

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Liesel Gentelli , Gillan Davis , Francis Albarède , Janne Blichert-Toft , Haim Gitler
{"title":"When is an owl not an owl? An analysis of Attic tetradrachms circulating in the southern Levant in the late fifth and fourth centuries BCE","authors":"Liesel Gentelli ,&nbsp;Gillan Davis ,&nbsp;Francis Albarède ,&nbsp;Janne Blichert-Toft ,&nbsp;Haim Gitler","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article, dedicated to the memory of the late Prof. John H. Kroll, focuses on late fifth century BCE Athenian-style tetradrachms found in the southern Levant, to shed new light on whether they are genuine Athenian issues or local imitations. To address this important yet vexed historical question, we analysed the Pb isotope compositions of 22 coins from ten controlled archaeological excavations in Israel and compared them against the ∼ 7,000 galena samples in the Lyon Pb isotope database. Nineteen of the coins are of the “three-quarter profile eye” variety conventionally dated mid to late fifth century BCE. We found that they match Attic or Athenian-controlled silver sources, suggesting they are authentic Athenian issues and not imitations as some of them were originally categorised. We argue that these coins likely entered the Western Asian money supply during Athens’ massive naval campaigns in the eastern Aegean in the third and final phase of the Peloponnesian War, and that the series should be refined to end with the city’s defeat and loss of silver sources in 404 BCE. The fact that three of the coins are plated supports the contention that they were part of the series minted when Athens was under extreme financial duress. The remaining two coins are of the <em>pi</em>-style series struck in the early 340 s BCE, as proposed by John H. Kroll (personal communication and cf. also <span><span>Flament, 2023</span></span>). The Pb isotope data indicate that our examples were not struck from Athenian silver casting doubt on the current theory that they were restruck Attic coins. These overall findings call for a reassessment of monetary sources, coin circulation, and local minting in the fourth century BCE in the southern Levant. This study also highlights the need for independent archaeological dating beyond reliance upon numismatic typology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 105634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X26000696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article, dedicated to the memory of the late Prof. John H. Kroll, focuses on late fifth century BCE Athenian-style tetradrachms found in the southern Levant, to shed new light on whether they are genuine Athenian issues or local imitations. To address this important yet vexed historical question, we analysed the Pb isotope compositions of 22 coins from ten controlled archaeological excavations in Israel and compared them against the ∼ 7,000 galena samples in the Lyon Pb isotope database. Nineteen of the coins are of the “three-quarter profile eye” variety conventionally dated mid to late fifth century BCE. We found that they match Attic or Athenian-controlled silver sources, suggesting they are authentic Athenian issues and not imitations as some of them were originally categorised. We argue that these coins likely entered the Western Asian money supply during Athens’ massive naval campaigns in the eastern Aegean in the third and final phase of the Peloponnesian War, and that the series should be refined to end with the city’s defeat and loss of silver sources in 404 BCE. The fact that three of the coins are plated supports the contention that they were part of the series minted when Athens was under extreme financial duress. The remaining two coins are of the pi-style series struck in the early 340 s BCE, as proposed by John H. Kroll (personal communication and cf. also Flament, 2023). The Pb isotope data indicate that our examples were not struck from Athenian silver casting doubt on the current theory that they were restruck Attic coins. These overall findings call for a reassessment of monetary sources, coin circulation, and local minting in the fourth century BCE in the southern Levant. This study also highlights the need for independent archaeological dating beyond reliance upon numismatic typology.
什么时候猫头鹰不是猫头鹰?对公元前五世纪晚期和四世纪在黎凡特南部流传的阿提卡四角尺的分析
为了纪念已故的John H. Kroll教授,这篇文章将重点放在公元前5世纪晚期在黎凡特南部发现的雅典风格的四角器上,以阐明它们是真正的雅典问题还是当地的仿制品。为了解决这个重要而又棘手的历史问题,我们分析了来自以色列10个受控考古发掘的22枚硬币的Pb同位素组成,并将它们与里昂Pb同位素数据库中的约7000个方铅矿样本进行了比较。其中19枚硬币是“四分之三轮廓眼”的品种,通常是公元前五世纪中后期。我们发现它们与阿提卡或雅典控制的白银来源相符,这表明它们是真正的雅典问题,而不是最初归类的仿制品。我们认为,这些硬币很可能是在伯罗奔尼撒战争的第三阶段也是最后阶段,雅典在爱琴海东部的大规模海军战役期间进入西亚货币供应的,并且该系列应该在公元前404年雅典战败并失去白银资源时被完善。其中三枚硬币是镀金的,这一事实支持了雅典在极度财政压力下铸造的一系列硬币的观点。剩下的两枚硬币是公元前340年早期铸造的pi风格系列,由John H. Kroll (personal communication and cf. also Flament, 2023)提出。铅同位素数据表明,我们的样品并不是用雅典银制成的,这使人们怀疑它们是重新铸造的阿提卡硬币。这些总体发现要求对公元前4世纪黎凡特南部的货币来源、硬币流通和当地铸造进行重新评估。这项研究还强调了独立考古年代的必要性,而不是依赖于货币类型学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书