Physicochemical investigation of DL-DOPA interaction with cationic surfactants: Micellization, binding thermodynamics, and solubilization

Q3 Materials Science
JCIS open Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jciso.2026.100171
El Mahdi Elkaseh , Haytham Abuissa , Eman Fadhil , Ashraf EL-Hashani
{"title":"Physicochemical investigation of DL-DOPA interaction with cationic surfactants: Micellization, binding thermodynamics, and solubilization","authors":"El Mahdi Elkaseh ,&nbsp;Haytham Abuissa ,&nbsp;Eman Fadhil ,&nbsp;Ashraf EL-Hashani","doi":"10.1016/j.jciso.2026.100171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the interaction between therapeutic agents and surfactant-based drug delivery systems is crucial for designing effective pharmaceutical formulations. This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the physicochemical interactions between the anti-parkinsonian drug DL-DOPA (DOPA) and two cationic surfactants, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and benzalkonium chloride (BKC), in aqueous media. The investigation was conducted using a suite of analytical techniques, including surface tensiometry, conductometry, and UV-Vis spectrophotometry at 25 °C. The results reveal a potent synergistic interaction between DOPA and both surfactants, evidenced by a remarkable depression in the critical micelle concentration (CMC): a 70% reduction was observed for BKC, while a dramatic 98% reduction was recorded for CPC, highlighting the superior efficiency of the latter in forming mixed micelles with DOPA. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that micellization and drug-micelle binding are spontaneous processes (ΔG &lt; 0). DOPA exhibited a significantly stronger interaction with CPC micelles compared to BKC, as evidenced by a higher binding constant (K<sub>b</sub> = 12.64 × 10<sup>4</sup> L/mol for CPC versus 3.14 × 10<sup>4</sup> L/mol for BKC) and a more favorable partition coefficient (K<sub>x</sub> = 27.82 × 10<sup>4</sup> L/mol for CPC versus 6.7 × 10<sup>4</sup>L/mol for BKC). This enhanced interaction with CPC is attributed to a combination of hydrophobic forces and potential π-π stacking between the pyridinium head group and the aromatic ring of DOPA. The findings demonstrate that both CPC and BKC can effectively interact with and solubilize DOPA, but CPC offers a more favorable binding and partitioning environment. This detailed characterization provides fundamental insights that can guide the rational selection of cationic surfactants for the development of advanced DOPA delivery systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73541,"journal":{"name":"JCIS open","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCIS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666934X26000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the interaction between therapeutic agents and surfactant-based drug delivery systems is crucial for designing effective pharmaceutical formulations. This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the physicochemical interactions between the anti-parkinsonian drug DL-DOPA (DOPA) and two cationic surfactants, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and benzalkonium chloride (BKC), in aqueous media. The investigation was conducted using a suite of analytical techniques, including surface tensiometry, conductometry, and UV-Vis spectrophotometry at 25 °C. The results reveal a potent synergistic interaction between DOPA and both surfactants, evidenced by a remarkable depression in the critical micelle concentration (CMC): a 70% reduction was observed for BKC, while a dramatic 98% reduction was recorded for CPC, highlighting the superior efficiency of the latter in forming mixed micelles with DOPA. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that micellization and drug-micelle binding are spontaneous processes (ΔG < 0). DOPA exhibited a significantly stronger interaction with CPC micelles compared to BKC, as evidenced by a higher binding constant (Kb = 12.64 × 104 L/mol for CPC versus 3.14 × 104 L/mol for BKC) and a more favorable partition coefficient (Kx = 27.82 × 104 L/mol for CPC versus 6.7 × 104L/mol for BKC). This enhanced interaction with CPC is attributed to a combination of hydrophobic forces and potential π-π stacking between the pyridinium head group and the aromatic ring of DOPA. The findings demonstrate that both CPC and BKC can effectively interact with and solubilize DOPA, but CPC offers a more favorable binding and partitioning environment. This detailed characterization provides fundamental insights that can guide the rational selection of cationic surfactants for the development of advanced DOPA delivery systems.

Abstract Image

DL-DOPA与阳离子表面活性剂相互作用的物理化学研究:胶束作用、结合热力学和增溶作用
了解治疗剂和基于表面活性剂的药物传递系统之间的相互作用对于设计有效的药物配方至关重要。本研究全面比较分析了抗帕金森药物DL-DOPA (DOPA)与两种阳离子表面活性剂十六烷基吡啶氯(CPC)和苯扎氯铵(BKC)在水介质中的物理化学相互作用。研究使用了一套分析技术,包括表面张力测定法、电导法和紫外可见分光光度法,在25°C下进行。结果表明,DOPA与两种表面活性剂之间存在有效的协同作用,显著降低了临界胶束浓度(CMC): BKC的临界胶束浓度降低了70%,而CPC的临界胶束浓度降低了98%,这表明后者与DOPA形成混合胶束的效率更高。热力学分析表明胶束化和药物胶束结合是自发过程(ΔG < 0)。与BKC相比,DOPA与CPC胶束的相互作用更强,其结合常数更高(CPC为12.64 × 104L/mol, BKC为3.14 × 104L/mol),分配系数更高(CPC为27.82 × 104L/mol, BKC为6.7 × 104L/mol)。这种与CPC的增强相互作用归因于疏水力和吡啶头基团与DOPA芳香环之间潜在的π-π堆积的结合。结果表明,CPC和BKC均能有效地与DOPA相互作用和溶解,但CPC提供了更有利的结合和分解环境。这种详细的表征提供了基本的见解,可以指导合理选择阳离子表面活性剂,以开发先进的DOPA递送系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCIS open
JCIS open Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Colloid and Surface Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书