A large language model-based method for trademark similarity analysis in the Brazilian context

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
World Patent Information Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.wpi.2026.102436
Igor Bezerra Reis , Rafael Angelo Santos Leite , Edilson Araujo Pires , Francisco José da Silva e Silva , Luciano Reis Coutinho , Ariel Soares Teles
{"title":"A large language model-based method for trademark similarity analysis in the Brazilian context","authors":"Igor Bezerra Reis ,&nbsp;Rafael Angelo Santos Leite ,&nbsp;Edilson Araujo Pires ,&nbsp;Francisco José da Silva e Silva ,&nbsp;Luciano Reis Coutinho ,&nbsp;Ariel Soares Teles","doi":"10.1016/j.wpi.2026.102436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A trademark aims to uniquely and distinctively identify the products and services offered by a company. It is a key intangible asset, acting as a fundamental tool to prevent unfair competition and strengthen a company’s market positioning. However, the increasing number of trademark applications submitted to the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) has introduced significant challenges, such as longer processing times, inconsistencies in decisions, and greater complexity in identifying conflicts. In this context, automated methods for trademark similarity analysis become essential to improve the efficiency, reliability, and speed of INPI decision-making processes. This study proposes a method based on Large Language Models (LLMs) to classify and explain the similarity between word marks, following INPI criteria: textual, phonetic, ideological, and market-related aspects. The proposed method is structured into two main components: (1) a classification model to identify conflicts between trademarks, and (2) an explanation model that provides detailed justifications for why two marks are considered similar or not. To develop this method, a dataset comprising real cases extracted from INPI official publications was used. Six open-source LLMs were evaluated on their ability to classify and explain trademark conflicts. The results demonstrated high performance for identifying similarity (accuracy <span><math><mo>≈</mo></math></span>99%, F1-score <span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span>98%, AUC <span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span>99%). The explanation reports were rated above 4.0 (on a 0–5 scale) by IP specialists. Therefore, our LLM-based proposed method demonstrates potential to modernize the trademark examination process. Ultimately, this study highlights the potential of LLMs to enhance trademark analysis, reduce subjectivity, increase transparency, and make trademark protection more accessible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51794,"journal":{"name":"World Patent Information","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 102436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Patent Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172219026000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A trademark aims to uniquely and distinctively identify the products and services offered by a company. It is a key intangible asset, acting as a fundamental tool to prevent unfair competition and strengthen a company’s market positioning. However, the increasing number of trademark applications submitted to the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) has introduced significant challenges, such as longer processing times, inconsistencies in decisions, and greater complexity in identifying conflicts. In this context, automated methods for trademark similarity analysis become essential to improve the efficiency, reliability, and speed of INPI decision-making processes. This study proposes a method based on Large Language Models (LLMs) to classify and explain the similarity between word marks, following INPI criteria: textual, phonetic, ideological, and market-related aspects. The proposed method is structured into two main components: (1) a classification model to identify conflicts between trademarks, and (2) an explanation model that provides detailed justifications for why two marks are considered similar or not. To develop this method, a dataset comprising real cases extracted from INPI official publications was used. Six open-source LLMs were evaluated on their ability to classify and explain trademark conflicts. The results demonstrated high performance for identifying similarity (accuracy ≈99%, F1-score >98%, AUC >99%). The explanation reports were rated above 4.0 (on a 0–5 scale) by IP specialists. Therefore, our LLM-based proposed method demonstrates potential to modernize the trademark examination process. Ultimately, this study highlights the potential of LLMs to enhance trademark analysis, reduce subjectivity, increase transparency, and make trademark protection more accessible.
基于大型语言模型的巴西商标相似度分析方法
商标的目的是唯一和显著地识别公司提供的产品和服务。它是一项关键的无形资产,是防止不正当竞争和加强公司市场定位的基本工具。然而,提交给巴西国家工业产权局(INPI)的商标申请数量的增加带来了重大挑战,例如处理时间延长、决定不一致以及识别冲突的复杂性增加。在这种背景下,商标相似度分析的自动化方法对于提高INPI决策过程的效率、可靠性和速度至关重要。本研究提出了一种基于大型语言模型(llm)的方法,根据INPI标准:文本、语音、意识形态和市场相关方面,对词标记之间的相似性进行分类和解释。所提出的方法由两个主要部分组成:(1)识别商标之间冲突的分类模型,以及(2)解释模型,为为什么两个商标被认为相似或不相似提供详细的理由。为了开发这种方法,使用了从INPI官方出版物中提取的真实案例数据集。对6名开源法学硕士进行了商标冲突分类和解释能力的评估。结果表明,相似性识别具有较高的性能(准确率≈99%,F1-score >98%, AUC >99%)。这些解释报告被知识产权专家评为4.0以上(0-5分)。因此,我们提出的基于法学硕士的方法显示了使商标审查过程现代化的潜力。最后,本研究强调了法学硕士在加强商标分析、减少主观性、增加透明度和使商标保护更容易获得方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Patent Information
World Patent Information INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The aim of World Patent Information is to provide a worldwide forum for the exchange of information between people working professionally in the field of Industrial Property information and documentation and to promote the widest possible use of the associated literature. Regular features include: papers concerned with all aspects of Industrial Property information and documentation; new regulations pertinent to Industrial Property information and documentation; short reports on relevant meetings and conferences; bibliographies, together with book and literature reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书