An unsupervised learning approach to optimising tumour therapy through clinical data mining

Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.health.2026.100450
Eleni Rozaki , Christina Skourou , David Fitzpatrick , Michael Amoo , Eoin Minnock , Caroline Hayhurst , Nachi Palaniappan , Mohsen Javadpour
{"title":"An unsupervised learning approach to optimising tumour therapy through clinical data mining","authors":"Eleni Rozaki ,&nbsp;Christina Skourou ,&nbsp;David Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;Michael Amoo ,&nbsp;Eoin Minnock ,&nbsp;Caroline Hayhurst ,&nbsp;Nachi Palaniappan ,&nbsp;Mohsen Javadpour","doi":"10.1016/j.health.2026.100450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinical data mining and healthcare analytics enable systematic evaluation of treatment strategies in precision oncology. This study analysed a harmonised multi-centre dataset of 150 patients treated with linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma across three institutions in Ireland and the UK. A data-driven framework combining descriptive analytics, unsupervised clustering (K-means and Gaussian Mixture Models), and Random Forest modelling was used to assess treatment plan consistency, explore dose–response patterns, and estimate clinical outcomes. Clustering identified four treatment plan groups with distinct profiles of tumour reduction and organ-at-risk exposure. Random Forest models linked these clusters and dosimetric factors with tumour control and functional preservation. While internal performance was high, results are interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample size and absence of external validation. By integrating unsupervised learning with interpretable predictive modelling, this study provides a reproducible approach to characterising dose–response heterogeneity across centres. The findings support the future development of decision-support tools, while recognising that prescriptive optimisation requires further causal or optimisation-based modelling beyond the present work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73222,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772442526000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical data mining and healthcare analytics enable systematic evaluation of treatment strategies in precision oncology. This study analysed a harmonised multi-centre dataset of 150 patients treated with linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma across three institutions in Ireland and the UK. A data-driven framework combining descriptive analytics, unsupervised clustering (K-means and Gaussian Mixture Models), and Random Forest modelling was used to assess treatment plan consistency, explore dose–response patterns, and estimate clinical outcomes. Clustering identified four treatment plan groups with distinct profiles of tumour reduction and organ-at-risk exposure. Random Forest models linked these clusters and dosimetric factors with tumour control and functional preservation. While internal performance was high, results are interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample size and absence of external validation. By integrating unsupervised learning with interpretable predictive modelling, this study provides a reproducible approach to characterising dose–response heterogeneity across centres. The findings support the future development of decision-support tools, while recognising that prescriptive optimisation requires further causal or optimisation-based modelling beyond the present work.
通过临床数据挖掘优化肿瘤治疗的无监督学习方法
临床数据挖掘和医疗保健分析使精准肿瘤学治疗策略的系统评估成为可能。本研究分析了一个协调的多中心数据集,其中150名患者在爱尔兰和英国的三个机构接受了基于linatic的立体定向放射手术治疗前庭神经鞘瘤。数据驱动的框架结合了描述性分析、无监督聚类(K-means和高斯混合模型)和随机森林模型,用于评估治疗计划的一致性、探索剂量-反应模式和估计临床结果。聚类确定了四个治疗方案组,具有肿瘤减少和器官危险暴露的不同概况。随机森林模型将这些簇和剂量学因素与肿瘤控制和功能保存联系起来。虽然内部性能很高,但由于样本量有限和缺乏外部验证,结果解释谨慎。通过将无监督学习与可解释的预测模型相结合,本研究提供了一种可重复的方法来表征各中心的剂量-反应异质性。研究结果支持决策支持工具的未来发展,同时认识到规范性优化需要进一步的因果关系或基于优化的建模,而不是目前的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation, Nursing and Health Professions (General)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书