Parameters selection for entropy measures in kinematic assessment of social intentions

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.bbe.2026.01.006
Gianmaria Mancioppi , Erika Rovini , Jasmine Pani , Elisa Beccai , Auriane Gros , Valeria Manera , Filippo Cavallo
{"title":"Parameters selection for entropy measures in kinematic assessment of social intentions","authors":"Gianmaria Mancioppi ,&nbsp;Erika Rovini ,&nbsp;Jasmine Pani ,&nbsp;Elisa Beccai ,&nbsp;Auriane Gros ,&nbsp;Valeria Manera ,&nbsp;Filippo Cavallo","doi":"10.1016/j.bbe.2026.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the use of entropy metrics to enhance traditional analysis of grasping movements. The authors examined whether signal unpredictability measures—Approximate Entropy (ApEn) and Sample Entropy (SampEn)—can reveal motor control aspects during reach-to-grasp actions. They aimed to determine if entropy could infer the movement’s underlying intention, distinguishing social (SOC) versus individual (IND) goals. Wrist acceleration data were collected via wearable Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) from 12 older adults performing repetitive reach-to-grasp tasks in two conditions: IND (acting alone) and SOC (passing an object to an experimenter). The hypothesis predicted that social actions involve tighter motor control, resulting in lower entropy. ApEn and SampEn were computed using different parameter sets (embedding dimension m = 2, 3; similarity criterion r = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3). Mixed-model repeated measures ANOVAs and linear mixed-effects models assessed differences between conditions and parameters. Results showed significant effects of condition, m, and r, including m × r interactions. Both ApEn and SampEn yielded lower entropy in the SOC condition, confirming the hypothesis. ApEn showed greater robustness and consistency across parameter settings and preprocessing steps compared to SampEn. This study is the first systematic comparison of ApEn and SampEn for action-related time series in social versus non-social contexts. Findings highlight the impact of social context on motor control. ApEn, especially with lower m (2) and r (0.1–0.2), is recommended for future studies due to its reliability and sensitivity in distinguishing movement intention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55381,"journal":{"name":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":"46 1","pages":"Pages 202-210"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521626000069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the use of entropy metrics to enhance traditional analysis of grasping movements. The authors examined whether signal unpredictability measures—Approximate Entropy (ApEn) and Sample Entropy (SampEn)—can reveal motor control aspects during reach-to-grasp actions. They aimed to determine if entropy could infer the movement’s underlying intention, distinguishing social (SOC) versus individual (IND) goals. Wrist acceleration data were collected via wearable Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) from 12 older adults performing repetitive reach-to-grasp tasks in two conditions: IND (acting alone) and SOC (passing an object to an experimenter). The hypothesis predicted that social actions involve tighter motor control, resulting in lower entropy. ApEn and SampEn were computed using different parameter sets (embedding dimension m = 2, 3; similarity criterion r = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3). Mixed-model repeated measures ANOVAs and linear mixed-effects models assessed differences between conditions and parameters. Results showed significant effects of condition, m, and r, including m × r interactions. Both ApEn and SampEn yielded lower entropy in the SOC condition, confirming the hypothesis. ApEn showed greater robustness and consistency across parameter settings and preprocessing steps compared to SampEn. This study is the first systematic comparison of ApEn and SampEn for action-related time series in social versus non-social contexts. Findings highlight the impact of social context on motor control. ApEn, especially with lower m (2) and r (0.1–0.2), is recommended for future studies due to its reliability and sensitivity in distinguishing movement intention.
社会意向动态评价中熵测度的参数选择
本研究探讨了熵度量的使用,以增强传统的抓取运动分析。作者研究了信号不可预测性测量-近似熵(ApEn)和样本熵(SampEn) -是否可以揭示伸手抓握动作中的运动控制方面。他们的目的是确定熵是否可以推断出运动的潜在意图,区分社会(SOC)和个人(IND)的目标。通过可穿戴惯性测量单元(IMU)收集了12名老年人在IND(单独行动)和SOC(将物体传递给实验者)两种条件下执行重复性伸手抓握任务的手腕加速度数据。该假说预测,社会行为涉及更严格的运动控制,从而导致更低的熵。使用不同的参数集(嵌入维数m = 2,3;相似度标准r = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3)计算ApEn和SampEn。混合模型重复测量方差分析和线性混合效应模型评估了条件和参数之间的差异。结果显示条件、m和r有显著影响,包括m × r相互作用。在SOC条件下,ApEn和SampEn的熵值都较低,证实了这一假设。与SampEn相比,ApEn在参数设置和预处理步骤方面表现出更强的鲁棒性和一致性。本研究首次系统比较了ApEn和SampEn在社会和非社会背景下的行动相关时间序列。研究结果强调了社会环境对运动控制的影响。ApEn尤其具有较低的m(2)和r(0.1-0.2),由于其在识别动作意图方面的可靠性和敏感性,推荐用于未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering is a quarterly journal, founded in 1981, devoted to publishing the results of original, innovative and creative research investigations in the field of Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering, which bridges mathematical, physical, chemical and engineering methods and technology to analyse physiological processes in living organisms as well as to develop methods, devices and systems used in biology and medicine, mainly in medical diagnosis, monitoring systems and therapy. The Journal''s mission is to advance scientific discovery into new or improved standards of care, and promotion a wide-ranging exchange between science and its application to humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书