Floating debris impact on historical masonry arch bridges: Model updating and fluid-structure interaction simulation

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122350
Quanjun Hua , Qing Chun , Yu Yuan
{"title":"Floating debris impact on historical masonry arch bridges: Model updating and fluid-structure interaction simulation","authors":"Quanjun Hua ,&nbsp;Qing Chun ,&nbsp;Yu Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Historical masonry arch bridges represent critical transportation infrastructure and irreplaceable cultural heritage, yet they face severe threats from floating debris impact during extreme hydrological events. Existing research primarily focuses on ship impact on modern bridges, paying insufficient attention to the material degradation caused by long-term weathering and water erosion. Moreover, current simulation methods often lack adequate bidirectional fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation for woody debris impact, leading to inaccurate safety evaluations. This study takes the Nanjing Putang Bridge—a nine-span historical masonry arch bridge constructed in 1512 and a Chinese key national cultural heritage site—as a case study. Two key contributions are presented: first, the development of a two-stage finite element model updating approach based on operational modal analysis to map material degradation; and second, the integration of the updated model with bidirectional FSI simulation to systematically investigate the bridge’s mechanical response under woody debris impact. Results show that under combined water flow and debris impact, tensile stress concentrates on the side wall of Pier No. 5 and joints between Arch No. 3 to No. 6 and their respective arch shoulder walls, without causing structural collapse. Additionally, existing ship collision codes overestimate the impact force of floating woody debris, while the current simulation impact values are only 13–41 % of code-derived ones. This overestimation is corrected by introducing a regression-derived dynamic correction coefficient. This study provides a reliable numerical framework for the safety assessment of historical masonry arch bridges against floating debris impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626002634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historical masonry arch bridges represent critical transportation infrastructure and irreplaceable cultural heritage, yet they face severe threats from floating debris impact during extreme hydrological events. Existing research primarily focuses on ship impact on modern bridges, paying insufficient attention to the material degradation caused by long-term weathering and water erosion. Moreover, current simulation methods often lack adequate bidirectional fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation for woody debris impact, leading to inaccurate safety evaluations. This study takes the Nanjing Putang Bridge—a nine-span historical masonry arch bridge constructed in 1512 and a Chinese key national cultural heritage site—as a case study. Two key contributions are presented: first, the development of a two-stage finite element model updating approach based on operational modal analysis to map material degradation; and second, the integration of the updated model with bidirectional FSI simulation to systematically investigate the bridge’s mechanical response under woody debris impact. Results show that under combined water flow and debris impact, tensile stress concentrates on the side wall of Pier No. 5 and joints between Arch No. 3 to No. 6 and their respective arch shoulder walls, without causing structural collapse. Additionally, existing ship collision codes overestimate the impact force of floating woody debris, while the current simulation impact values are only 13–41 % of code-derived ones. This overestimation is corrected by introducing a regression-derived dynamic correction coefficient. This study provides a reliable numerical framework for the safety assessment of historical masonry arch bridges against floating debris impact.
历史砌体拱桥浮石冲击:模型更新与流固耦合仿真
历史砌体拱桥是重要的交通基础设施和不可替代的文化遗产,但在极端水文事件中,它们面临着浮物冲击的严重威胁。现有的研究主要集中在船舶对现代桥梁的冲击上,而对长期风化和水侵蚀造成的材料退化关注不足。此外,目前的模拟方法往往缺乏对木屑撞击的双向流固耦合(FSI)模拟,导致安全性评估不准确。本研究以建于1512年的九跨历史砖石拱桥——南京普塘桥为例进行研究,该桥是中国国家重点文化遗产。提出了两个关键贡献:首先,基于操作模态分析的两阶段有限元模型更新方法的发展,以映射材料退化;二是将更新后的模型与双向FSI模拟相结合,系统研究木屑冲击下桥梁的力学响应。结果表明:在水流和岩屑联合冲击作用下,拉应力集中在5号墩侧壁和3 - 6号拱与各自拱肩墙的接头处,不会引起结构倒塌;此外,现有的船舶碰撞规范高估了漂浮木屑的冲击力,而目前的模拟冲击值仅为代码推导的13-41 %。通过引入回归衍生的动态修正系数来纠正这种高估。该研究为历史砌体拱桥抗浮石冲击安全性评估提供了可靠的数值框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书