Integrating ensemble learning and rocky desertification indices improves accuracy and interpretability of soil thickness prediction in karst landscapes

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Catena Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2026.109876
Fayong Fang , Ruyi Zi , Tingsheng Chen , Qilian Zhu , Zhen Han , Rui Hou , Wanyang Yu , Longshan Zhao
{"title":"Integrating ensemble learning and rocky desertification indices improves accuracy and interpretability of soil thickness prediction in karst landscapes","authors":"Fayong Fang ,&nbsp;Ruyi Zi ,&nbsp;Tingsheng Chen ,&nbsp;Qilian Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhen Han ,&nbsp;Rui Hou ,&nbsp;Wanyang Yu ,&nbsp;Longshan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2026.109876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil thickness, a critical parameter for hydrological partitioning, ecosystem functioning, and biogeochemical cycling, is challenging to predict spatially in complex karst landscapes—hampered by high heterogeneity, intricate natural/anthropogenic impacts, and rocky desertification. Here, we integrate interpretable machine learning (ML) with rocky desertification information indices (RIs) to enhance soil thickness prediction in typical karst regions. We evaluated six individual ML models and three stacking ensembles (with/without RIs). RIs significantly boosted model explanatory power and consistency (average 7% improvement, 4%–11%), capturing the heterogeneity of soil thickness associated with karst-specific soil degradation processes. Stacking ensembles reduced RMSE (1.33–2.95 cm) and MAE (0.99–2.73 cm); the stacking model with linear regression as meta-model performed best (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.47, RMSE = 31.50 cm), while the Cubist base model showed highest accuracy (CCC = 0.63, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45). Shapley additive explanations and permutation feature importance highlighted dominant drivers (rock exposure, vegetation cover, topography), improving transparency. Uncertainty assessments (prediction interval width and prediction interval ratio) validated robustness and identified high-uncertainty areas (steep topography, severe rocky desertification, model disagreement and sparse sampling). Our RIs-integrated model improves soil thickness prediction in karst regions, presents a potentially scalable framework for analogous complex landscapes, advances understanding of soil formation processes in karst systems, and thereby delivers targeted decision support for regional soil management practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"265 ","pages":"Article 109876"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622600086X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil thickness, a critical parameter for hydrological partitioning, ecosystem functioning, and biogeochemical cycling, is challenging to predict spatially in complex karst landscapes—hampered by high heterogeneity, intricate natural/anthropogenic impacts, and rocky desertification. Here, we integrate interpretable machine learning (ML) with rocky desertification information indices (RIs) to enhance soil thickness prediction in typical karst regions. We evaluated six individual ML models and three stacking ensembles (with/without RIs). RIs significantly boosted model explanatory power and consistency (average 7% improvement, 4%–11%), capturing the heterogeneity of soil thickness associated with karst-specific soil degradation processes. Stacking ensembles reduced RMSE (1.33–2.95 cm) and MAE (0.99–2.73 cm); the stacking model with linear regression as meta-model performed best (R2 = 0.47, RMSE = 31.50 cm), while the Cubist base model showed highest accuracy (CCC = 0.63, R2 = 0.45). Shapley additive explanations and permutation feature importance highlighted dominant drivers (rock exposure, vegetation cover, topography), improving transparency. Uncertainty assessments (prediction interval width and prediction interval ratio) validated robustness and identified high-uncertainty areas (steep topography, severe rocky desertification, model disagreement and sparse sampling). Our RIs-integrated model improves soil thickness prediction in karst regions, presents a potentially scalable framework for analogous complex landscapes, advances understanding of soil formation processes in karst systems, and thereby delivers targeted decision support for regional soil management practices.
将集合学习与石漠化指标相结合,提高了喀斯特景观土壤厚度预测的准确性和可解释性
土壤厚度是水文分区、生态系统功能和生物地球化学循环的关键参数,但在复杂的喀斯特景观中,由于高度异质性、复杂的自然/人为影响和石漠化,土壤厚度的空间预测具有挑战性。本文将可解释机器学习(ML)与石漠化信息指数(RIs)相结合,增强典型喀斯特地区土壤厚度预测。我们评估了6个独立的ML模型和3个堆叠集成(带/不带RIs)。RIs显著提高了模型的解释力和一致性(平均提高7%,4%-11%),捕获了与喀斯特特定土壤退化过程相关的土壤厚度的异质性。叠加集成降低了RMSE (1.33 ~ 2.95 cm)和MAE (0.99 ~ 2.73 cm);以线性回归为元模型的叠加模型精度最高(R2 = 0.47, RMSE = 31.50 cm),立体主义基础模型精度最高(CCC = 0.63, R2 = 0.45)。Shapley加性解释和排列特征强调了主要驱动因素(岩石暴露、植被覆盖、地形)的重要性,提高了透明度。不确定性评估(预测区间宽度和预测区间比)验证了鲁棒性,并识别出高不确定性区域(陡峭地形、严重石漠化、模型不一致和采样稀疏)。我们的ris集成模型改进了喀斯特地区的土壤厚度预测,为类似的复杂景观提供了一个潜在的可扩展框架,促进了对喀斯特系统土壤形成过程的理解,从而为区域土壤管理实践提供了有针对性的决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书