Development and formative evaluation of a follow-up checklist for patients who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer based on the Supportive Care Framework
Xinxin Huang , Qingqiu Wu , Min Hu , Xinxin Zhang , Beibei Song , Qingqing Hong , Shaohua Hu
{"title":"Development and formative evaluation of a follow-up checklist for patients who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer based on the Supportive Care Framework","authors":"Xinxin Huang , Qingqiu Wu , Min Hu , Xinxin Zhang , Beibei Song , Qingqing Hong , Shaohua Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2026.100914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Rectal cancer survivors who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) face complex challenges often under-addressed by surveillance-focused guidelines. Grounded in the Supportive Care Framework—which emphasizes meeting patients’ holistic needs to improve outcomes—this study developed and evaluated a phase-specific follow-up checklist to standardize post-discharge management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a mixed-methods design, an item pool was generated from a literature review (<em>n</em> = 18) and interviews (<em>n</em> = 19), mapped to the framework's four domains: physical, psychological, social, and informational. A two-round Delphi process (<em>n</em> = 15) refined the checklist. Consensus was reached through rigorous statistical validation of expert agreement. Finally, 12 patients and 7 nurses evaluated clinical acceptability and feasibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Evidence synthesis highlighted gaps in physical function and psychosocial adaptation. Experts achieved high consensus, resulting in 52 items across four recovery phases. The checklist operationalizes tasks ranging from preventive stoma care and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) management to social reintegration. Formative evaluation confirmed clinical utility and face validity, with an average nurse completion time of 22.7 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This theory-driven checklist complements surveillance guidelines by shifting focus to comprehensive survivorship care. It offers a structured workflow for the early detection of physical and psychosocial issues. Future research should prioritize multi-center psychometric validation and long-term effectiveness evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562526000648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Rectal cancer survivors who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) face complex challenges often under-addressed by surveillance-focused guidelines. Grounded in the Supportive Care Framework—which emphasizes meeting patients’ holistic needs to improve outcomes—this study developed and evaluated a phase-specific follow-up checklist to standardize post-discharge management.
Methods
Using a mixed-methods design, an item pool was generated from a literature review (n = 18) and interviews (n = 19), mapped to the framework's four domains: physical, psychological, social, and informational. A two-round Delphi process (n = 15) refined the checklist. Consensus was reached through rigorous statistical validation of expert agreement. Finally, 12 patients and 7 nurses evaluated clinical acceptability and feasibility.
Results
Evidence synthesis highlighted gaps in physical function and psychosocial adaptation. Experts achieved high consensus, resulting in 52 items across four recovery phases. The checklist operationalizes tasks ranging from preventive stoma care and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) management to social reintegration. Formative evaluation confirmed clinical utility and face validity, with an average nurse completion time of 22.7 minutes.
Conclusions
This theory-driven checklist complements surveillance guidelines by shifting focus to comprehensive survivorship care. It offers a structured workflow for the early detection of physical and psychosocial issues. Future research should prioritize multi-center psychometric validation and long-term effectiveness evaluation.