Development and formative evaluation of a follow-up checklist for patients who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer based on the Supportive Care Framework

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Xinxin Huang , Qingqiu Wu , Min Hu , Xinxin Zhang , Beibei Song , Qingqing Hong , Shaohua Hu
{"title":"Development and formative evaluation of a follow-up checklist for patients who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer based on the Supportive Care Framework","authors":"Xinxin Huang ,&nbsp;Qingqiu Wu ,&nbsp;Min Hu ,&nbsp;Xinxin Zhang ,&nbsp;Beibei Song ,&nbsp;Qingqing Hong ,&nbsp;Shaohua Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2026.100914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Rectal cancer survivors who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) face complex challenges often under-addressed by surveillance-focused guidelines. Grounded in the Supportive Care Framework—which emphasizes meeting patients’ holistic needs to improve outcomes—this study developed and evaluated a phase-specific follow-up checklist to standardize post-discharge management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a mixed-methods design, an item pool was generated from a literature review (<em>n</em> = 18) and interviews (<em>n</em> = 19), mapped to the framework's four domains: physical, psychological, social, and informational. A two-round Delphi process (<em>n</em> = 15) refined the checklist. Consensus was reached through rigorous statistical validation of expert agreement. Finally, 12 patients and 7 nurses evaluated clinical acceptability and feasibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Evidence synthesis highlighted gaps in physical function and psychosocial adaptation. Experts achieved high consensus, resulting in 52 items across four recovery phases. The checklist operationalizes tasks ranging from preventive stoma care and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) management to social reintegration. Formative evaluation confirmed clinical utility and face validity, with an average nurse completion time of 22.7 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This theory-driven checklist complements surveillance guidelines by shifting focus to comprehensive survivorship care. It offers a structured workflow for the early detection of physical and psychosocial issues. Future research should prioritize multi-center psychometric validation and long-term effectiveness evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562526000648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Rectal cancer survivors who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) face complex challenges often under-addressed by surveillance-focused guidelines. Grounded in the Supportive Care Framework—which emphasizes meeting patients’ holistic needs to improve outcomes—this study developed and evaluated a phase-specific follow-up checklist to standardize post-discharge management.

Methods

Using a mixed-methods design, an item pool was generated from a literature review (n = 18) and interviews (n = 19), mapped to the framework's four domains: physical, psychological, social, and informational. A two-round Delphi process (n = 15) refined the checklist. Consensus was reached through rigorous statistical validation of expert agreement. Finally, 12 patients and 7 nurses evaluated clinical acceptability and feasibility.

Results

Evidence synthesis highlighted gaps in physical function and psychosocial adaptation. Experts achieved high consensus, resulting in 52 items across four recovery phases. The checklist operationalizes tasks ranging from preventive stoma care and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) management to social reintegration. Formative evaluation confirmed clinical utility and face validity, with an average nurse completion time of 22.7 minutes.

Conclusions

This theory-driven checklist complements surveillance guidelines by shifting focus to comprehensive survivorship care. It offers a structured workflow for the early detection of physical and psychosocial issues. Future research should prioritize multi-center psychometric validation and long-term effectiveness evaluation.
基于支持性护理框架的直肠癌保括约肌手术患者随访清单的制定和形成性评估
目的:直肠癌幸存者接受了保留括约肌手术(SPS),他们面临着复杂的挑战,而这些挑战往往没有得到以监测为重点的指南的重视。在强调满足患者整体需求以改善结果的支持性护理框架的基础上,本研究开发并评估了一份针对特定阶段的随访清单,以规范出院后管理。方法采用混合方法设计,从文献综述(n = 18)和访谈(n = 19)中生成一个项目池,并将其映射到框架的四个领域:身体、心理、社会和信息。两轮德尔菲程序(n = 15)完善了清单。通过对专家协议的严格统计验证,达成了共识。最后,对12名患者和7名护士进行临床可接受性和可行性评估。结果证据综合突出了身体功能和心理社会适应方面的差距。专家们达成了高度共识,产生了跨越四个恢复阶段的52个项目。该清单包括从预防性造口护理和前低位切除综合征(LARS)管理到重新融入社会的任务。形成性评价证实了临床效用和面部效度,护士平均完成时间为22.7分钟。结论:这一理论驱动的检查表通过将重点转移到全面的生存护理上来补充了监测指南。它为早期发现身体和社会心理问题提供了一个结构化的工作流程。未来的研究应优先考虑多中心心理测量验证和长期有效性评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书