A post-mortem audit of the prevalence of ketoacidosis in diabetes and alcohol dependency

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Journal of forensic and legal medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2026.103088
Peter Vanezis , Rebecca Andrews , Limon Nahar , Ganesh Raj Selvaraja , Andrew Vanezis
{"title":"A post-mortem audit of the prevalence of ketoacidosis in diabetes and alcohol dependency","authors":"Peter Vanezis ,&nbsp;Rebecca Andrews ,&nbsp;Limon Nahar ,&nbsp;Ganesh Raj Selvaraja ,&nbsp;Andrew Vanezis","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2026.103088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ketoacidosis is a form of metabolic acidosis caused by the excess production of ketone bodies. It can be commonly found in the context of both diabetes mellitus and alcohol dependency but is also associated with a myriad other aetiologies. To date the extent of risk of developing ketoacidosis is unclear in diabetic persons who are alcohol dependent and/or have abused alcohol acutely as in ‘binge drinking’.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive coroners' autopsies between 2015 and 2023 in a London Coroner's jurisdiction of individuals aged 18 years and above to assess whether significant ketoacidosis, when present, was of diabetic or alcoholic aetiology or a combination of both. Data was obtained from the medical history, circumstances of death, histology, toxicology and biochemical markers. The deceased individuals were surveyed and categorised into the following three groups: 1. Individuals with diabetes mellitus type 1or 2 and with no known history of alcohol dependency according to their medical history; 2. Alcohol dependent persons or persons abusing alcohol acutely, without diabetes mellitus; 3. Diabetic individuals with known alcohol dependency or acute abuse as in ‘binge drinking’. Individuals suffering from other causes of ketoacidosis were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From an overall total of 3873 autopsies performed of persons 18 years or above over a 9-year period (2015-2023), 1021 cases were analysed and divided into three groups as stated above. Group 1 consisted of 635 diabetic individuals, with ketoacidosis present in 23 (3.6%). Group 2 consisted of 333 individuals with alcohol dependency, in which ketoacidosis was present in 17 (5.1%). Group 3 consisted of 56 individuals, with both diabetes and alcohol dependency, in which ketoacidosis was present in 7 (13%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated a statistically significant risk of developing ketoacidosis in all individuals with both diabetes mellitus and alcohol dependency (Group 3) when compared to diabetics alone (Group 1): Risk ratio = 3.8; p = .0001). There was less but significant increased risk when females alone were compared in these two groups. Less but significant increased risk was also found in all Group 3 individuals when compared to those in the alcohol alone category (Group 2) or when all individuals or males alone were compared between Group 1 + Group 2 with those in (Group 3). There was no significant increased risk when diabetics in Group 1 were compared to persons with alcohol dependency in Group 2.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103088"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X2600020X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ketoacidosis is a form of metabolic acidosis caused by the excess production of ketone bodies. It can be commonly found in the context of both diabetes mellitus and alcohol dependency but is also associated with a myriad other aetiologies. To date the extent of risk of developing ketoacidosis is unclear in diabetic persons who are alcohol dependent and/or have abused alcohol acutely as in ‘binge drinking’.

Methodology

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive coroners' autopsies between 2015 and 2023 in a London Coroner's jurisdiction of individuals aged 18 years and above to assess whether significant ketoacidosis, when present, was of diabetic or alcoholic aetiology or a combination of both. Data was obtained from the medical history, circumstances of death, histology, toxicology and biochemical markers. The deceased individuals were surveyed and categorised into the following three groups: 1. Individuals with diabetes mellitus type 1or 2 and with no known history of alcohol dependency according to their medical history; 2. Alcohol dependent persons or persons abusing alcohol acutely, without diabetes mellitus; 3. Diabetic individuals with known alcohol dependency or acute abuse as in ‘binge drinking’. Individuals suffering from other causes of ketoacidosis were excluded.

Results

From an overall total of 3873 autopsies performed of persons 18 years or above over a 9-year period (2015-2023), 1021 cases were analysed and divided into three groups as stated above. Group 1 consisted of 635 diabetic individuals, with ketoacidosis present in 23 (3.6%). Group 2 consisted of 333 individuals with alcohol dependency, in which ketoacidosis was present in 17 (5.1%). Group 3 consisted of 56 individuals, with both diabetes and alcohol dependency, in which ketoacidosis was present in 7 (13%).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a statistically significant risk of developing ketoacidosis in all individuals with both diabetes mellitus and alcohol dependency (Group 3) when compared to diabetics alone (Group 1): Risk ratio = 3.8; p = .0001). There was less but significant increased risk when females alone were compared in these two groups. Less but significant increased risk was also found in all Group 3 individuals when compared to those in the alcohol alone category (Group 2) or when all individuals or males alone were compared between Group 1 + Group 2 with those in (Group 3). There was no significant increased risk when diabetics in Group 1 were compared to persons with alcohol dependency in Group 2.
糖尿病和酒精依赖中酮症酸中毒流行的尸检审计
酮症酸中毒是一种由酮体过量产生引起的代谢性酸中毒。它可以在糖尿病和酒精依赖中普遍发现,但也与无数其他病因有关。迄今为止,酒精依赖和/或急性酗酒的糖尿病患者发生酮症酸中毒的风险程度尚不清楚。方法:我们对2015年至2023年伦敦验尸官辖区内18岁及以上的连续验尸官尸检进行回顾性分析,以评估是否存在明显的酮症酸中毒,如果存在,是糖尿病或酒精原因,还是两者兼有。数据来自病史、死亡情况、组织学、毒理学和生化指标。对死者进行了调查,并将其分为以下三组:1型或2型糖尿病患者,根据其病史没有已知的酒精依赖史;2. 酒精依赖者或急性酒精滥用者,无糖尿病;3. 糖尿病患者,已知酒精依赖或急性滥用,如“酗酒”。患有其他原因酮症酸中毒的个体被排除在外。结果2015-2023年9年间,共对3873例18岁及以上人群进行尸检,其中1021例进行分析,并按上述方法分为三组。1组635例糖尿病患者,其中23例(3.6%)出现酮症酸中毒。第2组333人有酒精依赖,其中17人(5.1%)出现酮症酸中毒。第3组包括56例糖尿病和酒精依赖患者,其中7例(13%)出现酮症酸中毒。本研究表明,与单独的糖尿病患者(1组)相比,所有糖尿病和酒精依赖患者(3组)发生酮症酸中毒的风险具有统计学意义:风险比= 3.8;p = 0.0001)。在这两组中,仅女性患病的风险增加较少,但却显著增加。与单独饮酒组(第2组)相比,第3组的所有个体或男性与第1组+第2组的个体或男性与第3组的个体相比,风险增加幅度较小,但也有显著增加。第1组的糖尿病患者与第2组的酒精依赖患者相比,风险没有显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective. The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training. The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书