The Effect of Federal Delisting on US Wolf Population Dynamics

IF 5.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Juan P. Ramírez-Loza, José V. López-Bao, Yaffa Epstein, Guillaume Chapron
{"title":"The Effect of Federal Delisting on US Wolf Population Dynamics","authors":"Juan P. Ramírez-Loza,&nbsp;José V. López-Bao,&nbsp;Yaffa Epstein,&nbsp;Guillaume Chapron","doi":"10.1111/con4.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Species protection laws, like the US Endangered Species Act (ESA), are key tools for reversing biodiversity loss. One important question concerns whether legal protection can be phased out once a species is considered recovered and how this affects population dynamics. We used Bayesian hierarchical models and time series of annual population size estimates for gray wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>) across eight US states to assess how annual population growth rates were affected by the proportion of each year that each wolf population was not listed under the ESA. We found that between 1979 and 2022, delisting had an overall negative effect on the growth rate of wolf populations. This effect remained after accounting for potential confounders like density dependence. The resulting growth rates after 1 year unlisted varied between the different states’ populations and included short-term declines as well as population stabilization and continued growth at slower rates over longer terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species protection laws, like the US Endangered Species Act (ESA), are key tools for reversing biodiversity loss. One important question concerns whether legal protection can be phased out once a species is considered recovered and how this affects population dynamics. We used Bayesian hierarchical models and time series of annual population size estimates for gray wolves (Canis lupus) across eight US states to assess how annual population growth rates were affected by the proportion of each year that each wolf population was not listed under the ESA. We found that between 1979 and 2022, delisting had an overall negative effect on the growth rate of wolf populations. This effect remained after accounting for potential confounders like density dependence. The resulting growth rates after 1 year unlisted varied between the different states’ populations and included short-term declines as well as population stabilization and continued growth at slower rates over longer terms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

联邦退市对美国狼种群动态的影响
物种保护法,如美国濒危物种法案(ESA),是扭转生物多样性丧失的关键工具。一个重要的问题是,一旦一个物种被认为已经恢复,是否可以逐步取消法律保护,以及这将如何影响种群动态。我们使用贝叶斯分层模型和美国8个州的灰狼(Canis lupus)年度种群规模估计的时间序列,以评估每年每个狼种群未列入ESA的比例如何影响年种群增长率。我们发现,在1979年至2022年间,退市对狼种群的增长率产生了总体负面影响。在考虑了密度依赖性等潜在混杂因素后,这种效应仍然存在。一年后,不同州人口的增长率有所不同,包括短期下降、人口稳定和长期内以较慢的速度持续增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书