Human Factors Influencing Trust in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Literature Review.

IF 1.8
Avishek Choudhury, Hamid Shamszare
{"title":"Human Factors Influencing Trust in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Avishek Choudhury, Hamid Shamszare","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2026.2625655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSThe adoption of AI in healthcare depends on calibrated trust-trust that matches the system's reliability and context. This review shows that clinicians value workload reduction, explainability, and alignment with clinical judgment, while patients emphasize transparency, fairness, and human-like interaction. Yet, trust is not automatic: performance gains may fail if AI undermines professional autonomy, and explainability reassures novices more than experts in high-stakes tasks. For occupational applications, AI must be designed to reduce cognitive burden, respect user expertise, and adapt to domain-specific needs. Organizations should invest in usability testing, peer and organizational support, and targeted training to foster informed trust. Regulators should enforce transparency and human oversight standards. Ultimately, calibrated trust, avoiding blind reliance or excessive skepticism, is essential to protect healthcare workers and patients while ensuring AI strengthens decision-making and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":" ","pages":"116-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2026.2625655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSThe adoption of AI in healthcare depends on calibrated trust-trust that matches the system's reliability and context. This review shows that clinicians value workload reduction, explainability, and alignment with clinical judgment, while patients emphasize transparency, fairness, and human-like interaction. Yet, trust is not automatic: performance gains may fail if AI undermines professional autonomy, and explainability reassures novices more than experts in high-stakes tasks. For occupational applications, AI must be designed to reduce cognitive burden, respect user expertise, and adapt to domain-specific needs. Organizations should invest in usability testing, peer and organizational support, and targeted training to foster informed trust. Regulators should enforce transparency and human oversight standards. Ultimately, calibrated trust, avoiding blind reliance or excessive skepticism, is essential to protect healthcare workers and patients while ensuring AI strengthens decision-making and safety.

影响医疗人工智能信任的人为因素:系统文献综述。
职业应用人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用取决于经过校准的信任——与系统的可靠性和环境相匹配的信任。这篇综述表明,临床医生重视减少工作量、可解释性和与临床判断的一致性,而患者则强调透明度、公平性和类似人类的互动。然而,信任并不是自动产生的:如果人工智能破坏了专业自主权,那么业绩提升可能会失败,而在高风险任务中,可解释性更能让新手而不是专家安心。对于职业应用,人工智能的设计必须减少认知负担,尊重用户专业知识,并适应特定领域的需求。组织应该投资于可用性测试、同伴和组织支持,以及有针对性的培训,以培养知情的信任。监管机构应加强透明度和人力监督标准。最终,校准信任,避免盲目依赖或过度怀疑,对于保护医护人员和患者,同时确保人工智能加强决策和安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书