Modulation of sensory attenuation by intensive meditation practice: an active inference perspective.

IF 3.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Neuroscience of Consciousness Pub Date : 2026-02-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/nc/niaf051
Arnaud Poublan-Couzardot, Alexandre Foncelle, Eric Koun, Yves Rossetti, Oussama Abdoun, Giuseppe Pagnoni, Antoine Lutz
{"title":"Modulation of sensory attenuation by intensive meditation practice: an active inference perspective.","authors":"Arnaud Poublan-Couzardot, Alexandre Foncelle, Eric Koun, Yves Rossetti, Oussama Abdoun, Giuseppe Pagnoni, Antoine Lutz","doi":"10.1093/nc/niaf051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Active inference describes motor action as a prediction-driven inferential process, whereby ascending proprioceptive prediction errors are attenuated to allow the fulfillment of expected movement. Meditative practices typically involve a heightened attention to bodily sensations, begging the question of whether this could partially offset the normal proprioceptive suppression during a simple motor act. In this study, 42 experienced meditators completed a tactile force-matching task, designed to measure somatosensory attenuation. The active group ([Formula: see text]) performed the task before (T1), during (T2), and three weeks after (T3) an intensive 10-day mindfulness meditation retreat, while a control waiting list group ([Formula: see text]) was also measured three times, but before participating in the retreat. Analysis of T1 data confirmed the presence of a general somatosensory attenuation effect across groups, which correlated negatively with pre-retreat trait measures of mindfulness, as predicted by our hypothesis. Contrary to our expectations, however, longitudinal analyses did not reveal a global reduction in somatosensory attenuation as an effect of intensive meditation practice. We observed instead a subtler regression-to-the-mean effect at T1, which increased with task repetition in control participants (T1>T2>T3), a training-related phenomenon not previously reported for the force-matching task. Interestingly, this habituation behavior was not shown by the active participants, who maintained the level of regression-to-the-mean observed at baseline at T2, suggesting that the formation of prior expectations about the presented force intensity may be affected by the retreat. We discuss how multiple, opposite effects of meditation on proprioceptive active inference mechanisms, and/or an alteration of prior formation and their influence, may explain these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":52242,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","volume":"2026 1","pages":"niaf051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12888824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaf051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active inference describes motor action as a prediction-driven inferential process, whereby ascending proprioceptive prediction errors are attenuated to allow the fulfillment of expected movement. Meditative practices typically involve a heightened attention to bodily sensations, begging the question of whether this could partially offset the normal proprioceptive suppression during a simple motor act. In this study, 42 experienced meditators completed a tactile force-matching task, designed to measure somatosensory attenuation. The active group ([Formula: see text]) performed the task before (T1), during (T2), and three weeks after (T3) an intensive 10-day mindfulness meditation retreat, while a control waiting list group ([Formula: see text]) was also measured three times, but before participating in the retreat. Analysis of T1 data confirmed the presence of a general somatosensory attenuation effect across groups, which correlated negatively with pre-retreat trait measures of mindfulness, as predicted by our hypothesis. Contrary to our expectations, however, longitudinal analyses did not reveal a global reduction in somatosensory attenuation as an effect of intensive meditation practice. We observed instead a subtler regression-to-the-mean effect at T1, which increased with task repetition in control participants (T1>T2>T3), a training-related phenomenon not previously reported for the force-matching task. Interestingly, this habituation behavior was not shown by the active participants, who maintained the level of regression-to-the-mean observed at baseline at T2, suggesting that the formation of prior expectations about the presented force intensity may be affected by the retreat. We discuss how multiple, opposite effects of meditation on proprioceptive active inference mechanisms, and/or an alteration of prior formation and their influence, may explain these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

强化冥想练习对感官衰减的调节:一个主动推理的视角。
主动推理将运动动作描述为一个预测驱动的推理过程,由此上升的本体感觉预测误差被减弱,以允许实现预期的运动。冥想练习通常涉及对身体感觉的高度关注,这就引出了一个问题,即这是否可以部分抵消在简单运动行为中正常的本体感觉抑制。在这项研究中,42名经验丰富的冥想者完成了一项旨在测量体感衰减的触觉力匹配任务。积极组([公式:见文])在进行为期10天的强化正念冥想静修之前(T1)、期间(T2)和三周后(T3)执行了任务,而对照等候组([公式:见文])也在参加静修之前进行了三次测量。T1数据的分析证实了群体间普遍存在体感衰减效应,正如我们的假设所预测的那样,这与正念的前退特质测量呈负相关。然而,与我们的预期相反,纵向分析并没有显示出强化冥想练习对体感衰减的整体减少。相反,我们在T1时观察到一种更微妙的回归均值效应,这种效应随着对照参与者(T1>T2>T3)的任务重复而增加,这是一种与训练相关的现象,之前没有报道过力匹配任务。有趣的是,这种习惯化行为并没有在积极参与者身上表现出来,他们在T2时保持了基线时观察到的回归均值水平,这表明对呈现的力量强度的先验预期的形成可能受到退缩的影响。我们讨论了冥想对本体感觉主动推理机制的多重相反作用,和/或先前形成的改变及其影响,如何解释这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience of Consciousness
Neuroscience of Consciousness Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书