Weathering the Storm Together: Therapists' Experiences Treating War Trauma Survivors While Managing Their Own Concurrent Trauma.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Liat Shklarski, Yael Latzer, Zohar Spivak-Lavi, Carol Tosone
{"title":"Weathering the Storm Together: Therapists' Experiences Treating War Trauma Survivors While Managing Their Own Concurrent Trauma.","authors":"Liat Shklarski, Yael Latzer, Zohar Spivak-Lavi, Carol Tosone","doi":"10.1002/smi.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental health therapists (MHTs) providing care during shared traumatic reality face distinct emotional and professional challenges, particularly when they are also personally affected. While a central concern is compassion fatigue, emotional exhaustion that arises from prolonged exposure to others' trauma, this concept does not capture the dual nature of the MHT's traumatic experience, both as a citizen of the region and as a helping professional exposed to the traumatic narratives of their clients. This study explores the shared traumatic reality experiences of MHTs working in a war zone, offering support to trauma survivors while navigating their own exposure to the same crisis. Through qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 20 therapists conducted between April and July 2024, three key themes emerged: (1) We're All in the Same Boat-When Boundaries Blur, reflecting how shared traumatic reality erodes traditional therapeutic roles; (2) The Collapse of Everyday Concerns-When Nothing Feels Important Unless It's Related to the War, illustrating how therapists deprioritised non-trauma issues and experienced emotional detachment; and (3) Therapy as Shared Emotional Support, highlighting a shift towards mutual validation rather than structured interventions. From these findings, we propose a model conceptualising the dual impact of shared traumatic reality on therapists: boundary dissolution can both increase distress and foster resilience, especially when cultural values of solidarity and mutual responsibility are present. Although rooted in one cultural context, this model underscores the importance of identifying community-level resilience factors that help MHTs maintain professional functioning during collective crises and when operating in war zones and other high-stress environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"e70132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mental health therapists (MHTs) providing care during shared traumatic reality face distinct emotional and professional challenges, particularly when they are also personally affected. While a central concern is compassion fatigue, emotional exhaustion that arises from prolonged exposure to others' trauma, this concept does not capture the dual nature of the MHT's traumatic experience, both as a citizen of the region and as a helping professional exposed to the traumatic narratives of their clients. This study explores the shared traumatic reality experiences of MHTs working in a war zone, offering support to trauma survivors while navigating their own exposure to the same crisis. Through qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 20 therapists conducted between April and July 2024, three key themes emerged: (1) We're All in the Same Boat-When Boundaries Blur, reflecting how shared traumatic reality erodes traditional therapeutic roles; (2) The Collapse of Everyday Concerns-When Nothing Feels Important Unless It's Related to the War, illustrating how therapists deprioritised non-trauma issues and experienced emotional detachment; and (3) Therapy as Shared Emotional Support, highlighting a shift towards mutual validation rather than structured interventions. From these findings, we propose a model conceptualising the dual impact of shared traumatic reality on therapists: boundary dissolution can both increase distress and foster resilience, especially when cultural values of solidarity and mutual responsibility are present. Although rooted in one cultural context, this model underscores the importance of identifying community-level resilience factors that help MHTs maintain professional functioning during collective crises and when operating in war zones and other high-stress environments.

一起度过风暴:治疗师治疗战争创伤幸存者的经验,同时管理他们自己的并发创伤。
在共同的创伤现实中提供护理的心理健康治疗师(MHTs)面临着不同的情感和专业挑战,特别是当他们也受到个人影响时。虽然主要关注的是同情疲劳,即长期暴露于他人创伤而产生的情感疲惫,但这一概念并没有捕捉到MHT创伤经历的双重性质,即作为该地区的公民,作为接触客户创伤叙事的帮助专业人员。本研究探讨了在战区工作的mht的共同创伤现实经历,为创伤幸存者提供支持,同时引导他们自己面对同样的危机。通过在2024年4月至7月期间对20名治疗师进行的定性、半结构化访谈,出现了三个关键主题:(1)我们都在同一条船上——当界限模糊时,反映了共同的创伤现实如何侵蚀传统的治疗角色;(2)日常关注的崩溃——当一切都不重要时,除非与战争有关,说明治疗师如何优先考虑非创伤性问题,并经历情感超脱;(3)作为共享情感支持的治疗,强调向相互验证而不是结构化干预的转变。根据这些发现,我们提出了一个概念化共享创伤现实对治疗师的双重影响的模型:边界溶解既可以增加痛苦,也可以培养恢复力,特别是当团结和相互责任的文化价值观存在时。虽然植根于一种文化背景,但该模型强调了识别社区层面的复原力因素的重要性,这些因素有助于mht在集体危机中以及在战区和其他高压力环境中运作时保持专业功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书