Paracetamol and NSAIDs in Cancer Pain Management: Evidence Review and Treatment Considerations.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kate Hanwell, Anna Bradley, Jason W Boland
{"title":"Paracetamol and NSAIDs in Cancer Pain Management: Evidence Review and Treatment Considerations.","authors":"Kate Hanwell, Anna Bradley, Jason W Boland","doi":"10.1007/s11864-025-01368-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OPINION STATEMENT: Pain is one of the most prevalent and distressing symptoms in cancer, affecting up to 90% of patients and significantly impairing quality of life. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely recommended by international guidelines for the management of non-surgical cancer pain, either alone or as adjuvants to opioids. In this paper, the current evidence for their efficacy, tolerability, and safety in this setting is reviewed. Evidence for paracetamol in cancer pain remains limited and of low quality. Small trials and systematic reviews suggest little or no additional analgesic benefit when used alongside strong opioids, and no clear advantage of intravenous over oral paracetamol has been demonstrated. Evidence for NSAIDs is slightly stronger, with studies indicating analgesic benefit both as monotherapy and in combination with opioids, although the quality of evidence is again restricted by small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and outdated trials. Concerns regarding adverse effects, particularly gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular, often limit use, athough short-term use in patients receiving palliative care may be safer than historically perceived. Comparative data between individual NSAIDs, routes of administration, and longer-term use are lacking. Overall, while both paracetamol and NSAIDs are commonly prescribed and theoretically beneficial, high-quality, adequately powered studies in patients with cancer pain are scarce. Further research is needed to evidence their role, especially in opioid-sparing strategies, as well as determining the relative clinical effectiveness and harm of individual NSAIDs in patients with non-surgical cancer pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":"27 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-025-01368-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Pain is one of the most prevalent and distressing symptoms in cancer, affecting up to 90% of patients and significantly impairing quality of life. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely recommended by international guidelines for the management of non-surgical cancer pain, either alone or as adjuvants to opioids. In this paper, the current evidence for their efficacy, tolerability, and safety in this setting is reviewed. Evidence for paracetamol in cancer pain remains limited and of low quality. Small trials and systematic reviews suggest little or no additional analgesic benefit when used alongside strong opioids, and no clear advantage of intravenous over oral paracetamol has been demonstrated. Evidence for NSAIDs is slightly stronger, with studies indicating analgesic benefit both as monotherapy and in combination with opioids, although the quality of evidence is again restricted by small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and outdated trials. Concerns regarding adverse effects, particularly gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular, often limit use, athough short-term use in patients receiving palliative care may be safer than historically perceived. Comparative data between individual NSAIDs, routes of administration, and longer-term use are lacking. Overall, while both paracetamol and NSAIDs are commonly prescribed and theoretically beneficial, high-quality, adequately powered studies in patients with cancer pain are scarce. Further research is needed to evidence their role, especially in opioid-sparing strategies, as well as determining the relative clinical effectiveness and harm of individual NSAIDs in patients with non-surgical cancer pain.

Abstract Image

对乙酰氨基酚和非甾体抗炎药在癌症疼痛管理中的应用:证据回顾和治疗考虑。
观点声明:疼痛是癌症中最普遍和令人痛苦的症状之一,影响高达90%的患者,并显著损害生活质量。对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)被国际指南广泛推荐用于治疗非手术性癌症疼痛,无论是单独使用还是作为阿片类药物的佐剂。在本文中,目前的证据,其有效性,耐受性和安全性在这种情况下进行了回顾。对乙酰氨基酚治疗癌症疼痛的证据仍然有限,质量也很低。小型试验和系统评价表明,当与强效阿片类药物一起使用时,很少或没有额外的镇痛效果,静脉注射扑热息痛比口服扑热息痛没有明显的优势。非甾体抗炎药的证据略强,研究表明单独治疗和与阿片类药物联合使用均有镇痛效果,尽管证据的质量再次受到样本量小、异质性和过时试验的限制。考虑到不良反应,特别是胃肠道、肾脏和心血管的不良反应,通常限制了其使用,尽管在接受姑息治疗的患者中短期使用可能比以往认为的更安全。缺乏个体非甾体抗炎药、给药途径和长期使用之间的比较数据。总的来说,虽然扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药都是常用的处方,理论上是有益的,但高质量的、有充分动力的癌症疼痛研究很少。需要进一步的研究来证明它们的作用,特别是在阿片类药物节约策略中的作用,以及确定个体非甾体抗炎药在非手术性癌症疼痛患者中的相对临床有效性和危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to cancer treatment. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as endocrine tumors, lymphomas, neuro-oncology, and cancers of the breast, head and neck, lung, skin, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary region. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known oncologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书