Drone-based geospatial prediction modeling identifies Fasciola hepatica infection risk in the Cusco Highlands of Peru.

IF 5.5 1区 医学
Bryan Fernandez-Camacho, Antony Barja, Luis C Revilla, Rodrigo A Ore, Jose L Alccacontor-Muñoz, Maria L Morales, Melinda B Tanabe, Gabriel Carrasco-Escobar, Miguel M Cabada
{"title":"Drone-based geospatial prediction modeling identifies Fasciola hepatica infection risk in the Cusco Highlands of Peru.","authors":"Bryan Fernandez-Camacho, Antony Barja, Luis C Revilla, Rodrigo A Ore, Jose L Alccacontor-Muñoz, Maria L Morales, Melinda B Tanabe, Gabriel Carrasco-Escobar, Miguel M Cabada","doi":"10.1186/s40249-026-01420-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fascioliasis is a neglected infectious disease affecting agricultural communities worldwide, with the Peruvian Andes among the most severely affected regions. Identifying fine-scale environmental risk patterns could support targeted surveillance and control. We aimed to develop predictive models of Fasciola hepatica infection in humans and sheep using drone-derived environmental indices in a rural Andean community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in the Huayllapata community, Cusco, Peru. Demographic, socioeconomic, and georeferenced infection data were collected from households and livestock with fascioliasis diagnosed by stool microscopy. High-resolution multispectral and thermal drone surveys were performed in April 2023 to derive environmental, topographic, and climatic indices. Logistic regression, random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and deep learning models were trained using literature-based or principal component analysis (PCA)-based variable selection strategies. Model performance was evaluated using standard and spatial cross validation approaches. Fine-scale probability surface maps were generated across the study area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Human fascioliasis prevalence was 21.3% of households, while sheep prevalence reached 80%. Under standard cross validation, RF achieved the best performance for human infection using the literature-based approach (accuracy = 0.89, sensitivity = 0.99, specificity = 0.88), while XGB performed best using the PCA-based approach (accuracy = 0.85, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.85). For sheep infection, XGB achieved the highest performance (accuracy = 0.93, sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.93) with literature-based variables and RF performed best under the PCA-based approach (accuracy = 0.85, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.86). Spatial cross-validation reduced accuracy and specificity across models but preserved high sensitivity. Probability maps revealed marked spatial heterogeneity in predicted risk within the community, with shifts in the location and magnitude of risk zones when spatial dependence was accounted for.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single Andean community, machine learning models integrating drone-derived environmental, topographic and climatic indices, successfully identified F. hepatica infection occurrence in humans and sheep. RF and XGB showed the most robust performance under spatial cross-validation, supporting the feasibility of UAV-based approaches for localized F. hepatica risk mapping.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"15 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-026-01420-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fascioliasis is a neglected infectious disease affecting agricultural communities worldwide, with the Peruvian Andes among the most severely affected regions. Identifying fine-scale environmental risk patterns could support targeted surveillance and control. We aimed to develop predictive models of Fasciola hepatica infection in humans and sheep using drone-derived environmental indices in a rural Andean community.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in the Huayllapata community, Cusco, Peru. Demographic, socioeconomic, and georeferenced infection data were collected from households and livestock with fascioliasis diagnosed by stool microscopy. High-resolution multispectral and thermal drone surveys were performed in April 2023 to derive environmental, topographic, and climatic indices. Logistic regression, random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and deep learning models were trained using literature-based or principal component analysis (PCA)-based variable selection strategies. Model performance was evaluated using standard and spatial cross validation approaches. Fine-scale probability surface maps were generated across the study area.

Results: Human fascioliasis prevalence was 21.3% of households, while sheep prevalence reached 80%. Under standard cross validation, RF achieved the best performance for human infection using the literature-based approach (accuracy = 0.89, sensitivity = 0.99, specificity = 0.88), while XGB performed best using the PCA-based approach (accuracy = 0.85, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.85). For sheep infection, XGB achieved the highest performance (accuracy = 0.93, sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.93) with literature-based variables and RF performed best under the PCA-based approach (accuracy = 0.85, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.86). Spatial cross-validation reduced accuracy and specificity across models but preserved high sensitivity. Probability maps revealed marked spatial heterogeneity in predicted risk within the community, with shifts in the location and magnitude of risk zones when spatial dependence was accounted for.

Conclusions: In this single Andean community, machine learning models integrating drone-derived environmental, topographic and climatic indices, successfully identified F. hepatica infection occurrence in humans and sheep. RF and XGB showed the most robust performance under spatial cross-validation, supporting the feasibility of UAV-based approaches for localized F. hepatica risk mapping.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于无人机的地理空间预测模型确定了秘鲁库斯科高地的肝片形吸虫感染风险。
背景:片形吸虫病是一种影响全世界农业社区的被忽视的传染病,秘鲁安第斯山脉是受影响最严重的地区之一。确定精细的环境风险模式可以支持有针对性的监测和控制。我们的目的是利用无人机衍生的安第斯农村社区环境指数,建立人类和绵羊肝片形吸虫感染的预测模型。方法:我们在秘鲁库斯科的huayylapata社区进行了横断面研究。收集了通过粪便显微镜诊断为片吸虫病的家庭和牲畜的人口统计学、社会经济和地理参考感染数据。2023年4月进行了高分辨率多光谱和热无人机调查,以获得环境、地形和气候指数。使用基于文献或基于主成分分析(PCA)的变量选择策略训练逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)、XGBoost (XGB)和深度学习模型。使用标准和空间交叉验证方法评估模型性能。在整个研究区域生成了精细比例的概率面图。结果:人片吸虫病家庭患病率为21.3%,羊片吸虫病家庭患病率为80%。在标准交叉验证下,基于文献的方法对人感染的RF检测效果最好(准确性= 0.89,灵敏度= 0.99,特异性= 0.88),而基于pca的方法对XGB检测效果最好(准确性= 0.85,灵敏度= 0.75,特异性= 0.85)。对于绵羊感染,基于文献变量的XGB方法表现最佳(准确性= 0.93,灵敏度= 0.65,特异性= 0.93),而基于pca的RF方法表现最佳(准确性= 0.85,灵敏度= 0.75,特异性= 0.86)。空间交叉验证降低了模型的准确性和特异性,但保持了高灵敏度。概率图揭示了社区内预测风险的显著空间异质性,当考虑到空间依赖性时,风险区域的位置和大小发生了变化。结论:在这个单一的安第斯群落中,机器学习模型整合了无人机衍生的环境、地形和气候指数,成功地识别了人类和绵羊的肝杆菌感染情况。RF和XGB在空间交叉验证中表现出最稳健的性能,支持了基于无人机的局部肝炎风险制图方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书