{"title":"Investigation of Alpha Band Activity in Self-Paced and Externally-Paced Tasks: A Fitts and Posner Perspective.","authors":"Fatemeh Keshvari, Alireza Farsi, Behrouz Abdoli","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2026.2626496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored Alpha band activity during automaticity in self- and externally-paced basketball tasks, per the Fitts and Posner model. Twenty male basketball players volunteered, split into elite and trained groups. Alpha band power was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results showed elite athletes had greater Alpha band activation than the trained group across both tasks. Alpha band activation was also higher in the free-throw task compared to pass-catching. This difference was more pronounced in the elite group; the trained group showed no significant Alpha band activity difference between tasks. Detailed elite group analysis revealed the free-throw task elicited higher Alpha band power in most cortical regions (excluding temporal and occipital areas) compared to pass-catching. Alpha band activity for the free-throw task was greater in the seconds leading up to execution, but no difference was observed between the two tasks during the actual execution. While self-paced findings align with the general neural efficiency hypothesis, elite Alpha band modulations during externally-paced tasks are better explained by the net neural efficiency and pulsed inhibition hypotheses. Overall, these findings highlight the need to revise neural-efficiency accounts from self-paced skills, explicitly considering perceptual-attentional processing demands imposed by dynamic, reactive, externally paced tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"184-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2026.2626496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explored Alpha band activity during automaticity in self- and externally-paced basketball tasks, per the Fitts and Posner model. Twenty male basketball players volunteered, split into elite and trained groups. Alpha band power was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results showed elite athletes had greater Alpha band activation than the trained group across both tasks. Alpha band activation was also higher in the free-throw task compared to pass-catching. This difference was more pronounced in the elite group; the trained group showed no significant Alpha band activity difference between tasks. Detailed elite group analysis revealed the free-throw task elicited higher Alpha band power in most cortical regions (excluding temporal and occipital areas) compared to pass-catching. Alpha band activity for the free-throw task was greater in the seconds leading up to execution, but no difference was observed between the two tasks during the actual execution. While self-paced findings align with the general neural efficiency hypothesis, elite Alpha band modulations during externally-paced tasks are better explained by the net neural efficiency and pulsed inhibition hypotheses. Overall, these findings highlight the need to revise neural-efficiency accounts from self-paced skills, explicitly considering perceptual-attentional processing demands imposed by dynamic, reactive, externally paced tasks.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.