The Nonverbal Emotion Assessment Tool (NEAT): An intercultural validation.

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emotion Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1037/emo0001651
Matthias Pache, Lena Miketta, Rainer Banse, Milena Elchinova, Taufik Mohammad, Ursula Hess
{"title":"The Nonverbal Emotion Assessment Tool (NEAT): An intercultural validation.","authors":"Matthias Pache, Lena Miketta, Rainer Banse, Milena Elchinova, Taufik Mohammad, Ursula Hess","doi":"10.1037/emo0001651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research aimed to validate a newly developed tool for the assessment of emotions. The \"Nonverbal Emotion Assessment Tool\" (NEAT) is based on schematic facial expressions of emotions and serves to capture both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of common emotions. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 126) was conducted with primary school children (6-11 years), who matched the emotions represented in vignettes to the emotional facial expressions of the NEAT. Although the children's recognition rates varied across emotions, they were overall moderately accurate. Older children did not perform substantially better than younger children. Study 2 validated the NEAT scales with adult participants from Germany (<i>N</i> = 102), Bulgaria (<i>N</i> = 116), and Malaysia (<i>N</i> = 132). Cross-country intraclass correlations revealed cultural differences in emotion perception, yet the construct validity was high. Comparisons of the two European samples with the Southeast Asian sample yielded a lower level of agreement across countries than the comparison of the two European samples, suggesting more similarities between the German and Bulgarian samples and stronger differences between the European and the Malaysian sample. Together, these findings provide evidence that the NEAT is a useful and valid tool for the assessment of emotions in child and adult samples from different areas of the world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1407-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to validate a newly developed tool for the assessment of emotions. The "Nonverbal Emotion Assessment Tool" (NEAT) is based on schematic facial expressions of emotions and serves to capture both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of common emotions. Study 1 (N = 126) was conducted with primary school children (6-11 years), who matched the emotions represented in vignettes to the emotional facial expressions of the NEAT. Although the children's recognition rates varied across emotions, they were overall moderately accurate. Older children did not perform substantially better than younger children. Study 2 validated the NEAT scales with adult participants from Germany (N = 102), Bulgaria (N = 116), and Malaysia (N = 132). Cross-country intraclass correlations revealed cultural differences in emotion perception, yet the construct validity was high. Comparisons of the two European samples with the Southeast Asian sample yielded a lower level of agreement across countries than the comparison of the two European samples, suggesting more similarities between the German and Bulgarian samples and stronger differences between the European and the Malaysian sample. Together, these findings provide evidence that the NEAT is a useful and valid tool for the assessment of emotions in child and adult samples from different areas of the world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

非语言情绪评估工具(NEAT):跨文化验证。
这项研究旨在验证一种新开发的评估情绪的工具。“非语言情绪评估工具”(NEAT)基于情绪的面部表情示意图,用于捕获常见情绪的定量和定性维度。研究1 (N = 126)是在小学生(6-11岁)中进行的,他们将小插图中所代表的情绪与NEAT的情绪面部表情相匹配。尽管孩子们的识别率因情绪而异,但总体来说,他们的准确率是中等的。年龄较大的孩子并没有比年龄较小的孩子表现得更好。研究2对来自德国(N = 102)、保加利亚(N = 116)和马来西亚(N = 132)的成年参与者进行了NEAT量表的验证。跨国家的班级内相关揭示了情绪知觉的文化差异,但结构效度较高。将两个欧洲样本与东南亚样本进行比较,各国之间的一致性低于两个欧洲样本的比较,这表明德国和保加利亚样本之间有更多的相似之处,而欧洲和马来西亚样本之间的差异更大。总之,这些发现提供了证据,证明NEAT是评估来自世界不同地区的儿童和成人样本情绪的有用和有效的工具。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书