Acetabular cup anteversion measurement in total hip arthroplasty: reliability of metal artifact reduction MRI compared with CT.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s00256-026-05161-y
Frederik Abel, Patrick O Zingg, Reto Sutter, Florian Schmaranzer
{"title":"Acetabular cup anteversion measurement in total hip arthroplasty: reliability of metal artifact reduction MRI compared with CT.","authors":"Frederik Abel, Patrick O Zingg, Reto Sutter, Florian Schmaranzer","doi":"10.1007/s00256-026-05161-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The acetabular cup version in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a key parameter influencing hip stability and functional outcomes. Although CT remains the reference standard for assessing cup orientation, MRI with metal artifact reduction techniques is increasingly used for evaluating postoperative pain. This study compared MRI- and CT-based measurements of acetabular cup version regarding agreement, reproducibility, and reliability.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent THA between 2015 and 2025 with postoperative CT and MRI were retrospectively analyzed. MRI was performed using optimized metal artifact reduction sequences. Acetabular cup version was measured on axial high-bandwidth T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences and on corresponding CT scans by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Inter- and intra-reader, as well as inter-modality agreement, were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Bland-Altman plots evaluated systematic bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included (mean age, 64.1 years; 14 women). Mean acetabular version was 31.2° (standard deviation (SD), 9.4-10.3) for CT and 30.1-30.2° (SD, 8.9-9.3) for MRI for both readers. Inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for CT (ICC, 0.96) and substantial for MRI (ICC, 0.76). Intra-reader agreement was almost perfect for both modalities (ICC, CT, 0.99; MRI, 0.94). Bland-Altman analysis showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MRI measurements with a slight positive bias for MRI (mean pooled difference, 1.1°; p = 0.058; limits of agreement, -4.7 to 6.8°) and almost perfect agreement for both readers (ICC, 0.86-0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI measures acetabular cup version with excellent reliability and close agreement with CT, reinforcing MRI's role in postoperative THA evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1329-1336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-026-05161-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The acetabular cup version in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a key parameter influencing hip stability and functional outcomes. Although CT remains the reference standard for assessing cup orientation, MRI with metal artifact reduction techniques is increasingly used for evaluating postoperative pain. This study compared MRI- and CT-based measurements of acetabular cup version regarding agreement, reproducibility, and reliability.

Material and methods: Patients who underwent THA between 2015 and 2025 with postoperative CT and MRI were retrospectively analyzed. MRI was performed using optimized metal artifact reduction sequences. Acetabular cup version was measured on axial high-bandwidth T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences and on corresponding CT scans by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Inter- and intra-reader, as well as inter-modality agreement, were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Bland-Altman plots evaluated systematic bias.

Results: Thirty patients were included (mean age, 64.1 years; 14 women). Mean acetabular version was 31.2° (standard deviation (SD), 9.4-10.3) for CT and 30.1-30.2° (SD, 8.9-9.3) for MRI for both readers. Inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for CT (ICC, 0.96) and substantial for MRI (ICC, 0.76). Intra-reader agreement was almost perfect for both modalities (ICC, CT, 0.99; MRI, 0.94). Bland-Altman analysis showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MRI measurements with a slight positive bias for MRI (mean pooled difference, 1.1°; p = 0.058; limits of agreement, -4.7 to 6.8°) and almost perfect agreement for both readers (ICC, 0.86-0.90).

Conclusion: MRI measures acetabular cup version with excellent reliability and close agreement with CT, reinforcing MRI's role in postoperative THA evaluation.

全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯前倾测量:金属伪影复位MRI与CT的可靠性比较。
目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)患者髋臼杯型是影响髋关节稳定性和功能预后的关键参数。尽管CT仍然是评估杯位的参考标准,但带有金属伪影复位技术的MRI越来越多地用于评估术后疼痛。本研究比较了基于MRI和ct的髋臼杯型测量的一致性、可重复性和可靠性。材料和方法:回顾性分析2015 - 2025年间行THA术后CT和MRI检查的患者。MRI采用优化的金属伪影还原序列。髋臼杯型由两名肌肉骨骼放射科医生通过轴向高带宽t1加权涡轮旋转回波序列和相应的CT扫描进行测量。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估阅读器间和阅读器内以及模态间的一致性。Bland-Altman图评估了系统偏差。结果:纳入30例患者,平均年龄64.1岁,女性14例。CT和MRI的平均髋臼角度分别为31.2°(标准差为9.4-10.3)和30.1-30.2°(标准差8.9-9.3)。CT (ICC, 0.96)和MRI (ICC, 0.76)的读者间一致性几乎是完美的。两种模式的解读一致性几乎是完美的(ICC, CT, 0.99; MRI, 0.94)。Bland-Altman分析显示,CT和MRI测量结果之间没有统计学上的显著差异,MRI有轻微的正偏倚(平均汇总差异为1.1°;p = 0.058;一致性限制为-4.7至6.8°),两种读数几乎完全一致(ICC, 0.86-0.90)。结论:MRI测量髋臼杯型具有良好的可靠性,与CT吻合较好,加强了MRI在THA术后评价中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书